Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? #929355
02/15/11 02:09 AM
02/15/11 02:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
F
funny662 Offline OP
member
funny662  Offline OP
member
F

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
need help to ID these carbs -wanting to put this set up on a 69 Coronet RT---I am wondering if its a mis-matched set and if it would work ok
2380/4365-1
2168/4669
2040/4672
intake is aluminum edelbrock--3412046-the 6 is angled slightly and a little bit of a different font as the rest of the numbers
thank you in advance
BTW-I am sure this has been covered before--Sorry--I am new here and the search feature shows notta

6476749-69RT.jpg (111 downloads)
Last edited by funny662; 02/15/11 02:16 AM.
Re: supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? [Re: funny662] #929356
02/15/11 02:21 AM
02/15/11 02:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
Intake (Sounds) like an original 1969 intake

Carbs are as follows:

2380/4365-1 = 1970 440+6 Rear W/95 Dated code = 238th day of a year ending in 0

2168/4669 = 1971 440+6 Center - Manual Trans Date code = 2168th day of a year ending in 8

2040/4672 = 1971 440+6 Rear Date code = 204th day or a year ending in 0

Yes, these carbs are a mix matched set but if set up correctly will work fine together, fronts and rears can be interchanged.


Re: supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #929357
02/15/11 02:38 AM
02/15/11 02:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
F
funny662 Offline OP
member
funny662  Offline OP
member
F

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
thanks for the reply-now what confuses me is the production in year ending with 8 on the 2168/4669 carb----78??
here some pics-its all I have at this time-hard to make out the numbers on that particular carb in question

6476792-1.jpg (105 downloads)
Re: supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? [Re: funny662] #929358
02/15/11 02:39 AM
02/15/11 02:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
F
funny662 Offline OP
member
funny662  Offline OP
member
F

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
next

6476795-2.jpg (111 downloads)
Re: supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? [Re: funny662] #929359
02/15/11 02:41 AM
02/15/11 02:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms Offline
Mr Wizzard
ScottSmith_Harms  Offline
Mr Wizzard

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
Yes, 1978/88/98/2008, etc. Holley never indicated which decade, only the year.

The most likely scenario is that the "0" carbs were made in 1970 and the "8" carb was made in 1978.

Re: supposed to be a 69 440 6 pack set up----BUT-is it ? [Re: ScottSmith_Harms] #929360
02/15/11 02:42 AM
02/15/11 02:42 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
F
funny662 Offline OP
member
funny662  Offline OP
member
F

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 9
Herrin,Illinois
last

6476798-3.jpg (128 downloads)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1