Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Offset Cylinder Boring #922413
02/06/11 05:14 PM
02/06/11 05:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
T
TrWaters Offline OP
top fuel
TrWaters  Offline OP
top fuel
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
I searched for an hour on here and found many references to offset boring of cylinders (side to side....not front to rear) to compensate for block core shift, but nowhere did I find what might be considered an acceptable (or maximum) amount of offset. Are there considerations other than the combustion chambers? Thanks.


TR Waters
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: TrWaters] #922414
02/06/11 05:44 PM
02/06/11 05:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
Boring parallel to the centerline of the crankshaft

Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: TrWaters] #922415
02/06/11 05:51 PM
02/06/11 05:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
CRE2004 Offline
super gas
CRE2004  Offline
super gas

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,503
Illinois
I don't understand your statement/question. What are you looking to do? The "acceptable" level of offset would depend upon the available material thickness. Then keep in mind you'll have to make sure you have piston pin boss to rod clearance. I've moved them up to .060".

Last edited by CRE2004; 02/06/11 07:02 PM.
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: TrWaters] #922416
02/06/11 06:55 PM
02/06/11 06:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Crizila Offline
master
Crizila  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,506
Az
Quote:

I searched for an hour on here and found many references to offset boring of cylinders (side to side....not front to rear) to compensate for block core shift, but nowhere did I find what might be considered an acceptable (or maximum) amount of offset. Are there considerations other than the combustion chambers? Thanks.


I'm running a 71 360 block with one hole offset bored with no problem. Wasn't done for core shift though. Had some detonation problems with a 408 motor that was already .030 over. Broke a top ring land and did minor bore damage. Had the hole bored for a .040 over slug to fix the damage ( .009 on the damaged side and .001 on the good side. Worked great. I guess I'm one of the few guys that is running a 410 ( or there abouts ) stroker motor. . If I remember, the damage was towards the front of the block, but I would guess you could easily get away with that much offset ( and probably more) anywhere 360 degrees in the hole.


Fastest 300
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: TrWaters] #922417
02/06/11 07:07 PM
02/06/11 07:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
The change affects the clock position of that piston vs. its crank throw.

Assuming the pin eye as the focal point, an RB has a radius of 1/2 stroke + rod = 8.635", = 54.255" circumference circle, = .151" per degree.
That makes any re-location almost invisible, like .030" is 1/5th of a degree.

Someone check my math, please?


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: polyspheric] #922418
02/06/11 07:28 PM
02/06/11 07:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,632
Lubbock,TX
D
DavidDean Offline
top fuel
DavidDean  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,632
Lubbock,TX
Good Post Im having to offset the bores of my X block. Im having to shift to the front about .050 to correct wall thickness.There's also some good reading at speedtalk.com.

Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: CRE2004] #922419
02/06/11 07:46 PM
02/06/11 07:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
T
TrWaters Offline OP
top fuel
TrWaters  Offline OP
top fuel
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
Quote:

I don't understand your statement/question. What are you looking to do? The "acceptable" level of offset would depend upon the available material thickness. Then keep in mind you'll have to make sure you have piston pin boss to rod clearance. I've moved them up to .060".




By acceptable I meant before other issues would come into play. But as Jeff posted, it is a non issue.

Thank you.


TR Waters
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: DavidDean] #922420
02/06/11 07:46 PM
02/06/11 07:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Good Post Im having to offset the bores of my X block. Im having to shift to the front about .050 to correct wall thickness.There's also some good reading at speedtalk.com.




I dont understand... why not just sleeve it
I knew if you wanted a big bore they did it but to
correct for core shift or a broken cylinder I would
have thought just sleeving it would do

Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: MR_P_BODY] #922421
02/06/11 07:55 PM
02/06/11 07:55 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 413
Norway (old world)
Oyvind Mopar Offline
mopar
Oyvind Mopar  Offline
mopar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 413
Norway (old world)
Should not be an issue. The factory did move the c/l of the pistonpin .060 to the side, and some have turned this the other way around, and other pistons do have them in center. So the geometrical difference would be similar to offset boring to the sides. I have salvaged many cylinders by offset boring. My

Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: Oyvind Mopar] #922422
02/06/11 08:35 PM
02/06/11 08:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
T
TrWaters Offline OP
top fuel
TrWaters  Offline OP
top fuel
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,129
Vermont
This particuliar block has good numbers on the outside walls.... drivers minor thrust and passenger major thrust, with fair numbers down the inner walls. Thanks for the replies.


TR Waters
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: MR_P_BODY] #922423
02/07/11 01:39 AM
02/07/11 01:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,632
Lubbock,TX
D
DavidDean Offline
top fuel
DavidDean  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,632
Lubbock,TX
Quote:

Quote:

Good Post Im having to offset the bores of my X block. Im having to shift to the front about .050 to correct wall thickness.There's also some good reading at speedtalk.com.




I dont understand... why not just sleeve it
I knew if you wanted a big bore they did it but to
correct for core shift or a broken cylinder I would
have thought just sleeving it would do



In my case I would have to sleeve 4 cylinders and this X block hasnt been bored at all

Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: B G Racing] #922424
02/07/11 02:50 AM
02/07/11 02:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
M
mr_340 Offline
master
mr_340  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,505
DFW
Quote:

Boring parallel to the centerline of the crankshaft


I'm curious to what Bob has found by boring offset to the crank centerline? Does this allow a better push on the piston for more torque? I heard the PS guys were doing it several years back. Any results that can be divulged?


Floyd Lippencott IV
Re: Offset Cylinder Boring [Re: mr_340] #922425
02/07/11 06:41 AM
02/07/11 06:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
B G Racing Offline
master
B G Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,910
Eighty Four, PA
Quote:

Quote:

Boring parallel to the centerline of the crankshaft


I'm curious to what Bob has found by boring offset to the crank centerline? Does this allow a better push on the piston for more torque? I heard the PS guys were doing it several years back. Any results that can be divulged?




It eliminates any odd angle loading(friction)caused by the bore location and allows all pistons and rods to traval in the same plane or designed angle. .Any time you can decrease friction you can gain RPM,HP,TQ.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1