Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Head vs Head #921348
02/04/11 11:27 PM
02/04/11 11:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 248
Ohio
aquamist60 Offline OP
enthusiast
aquamist60  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 248
Ohio
Just tossing around some ideas in my head about heads. A 340 with a non T/A 3418915 head has 1.88" intake valves. Take the same exact head & use a 2.02" intake valve. With everything else being the same in the engine, which one would have more power & torque? How much would you gain with a port job on the 2.02 head?
Let's say they go on a 1969 engine. I know I'm being somewhat vague with the rest of the engine. If the engine is almost stock and has run a 12.19 @ 109 mph in the 1/4, could/would you expect to pick up any in et & mph by switching to the 2.02" heads? Just curious about what you think.

Re: Head vs Head [Re: aquamist60] #921349
02/05/11 10:04 AM
02/05/11 10:04 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 316
Coolville, Ohio
L
Lew Offline
enthusiast
Lew  Offline
enthusiast
L

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 316
Coolville, Ohio
Im not a head guru, or a guru of anything else, thats why im always on here asking ???'s. But i have heard and or read that small valves like mild to moderat builds with 55 to 62k ish shifts, big valves like more everything to make power, not much info but maybe it will pull in a more knowlegable chimer.

Re: Head vs Head [Re: aquamist60] #921350
02/05/11 11:00 AM
02/05/11 11:00 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
S
S/ST 3040 Offline
master
S/ST 3040  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,595
On the south side of Nowhere
In your example, the 2.02" valve would help. Reason being, a
bigger valve provides more in­­² of curtain area. It would also
help if a valve job was employed to enhance the air flow at
the valve lift your camshaft dictated.

Porting helps too but, is more advantageous at higher lifts
and engine speeds. Then, you'd want to use a valve job
tailored to that use.








Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1