|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: moderncylinder]
#897879
01/07/11 04:52 PM
01/07/11 04:52 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
camastomcat
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
|
Quote:
with 572-13 head you make a solid 950hp,, which would still be fast in a 2350lb car...
i know guys around here that made 1000 or a lil more then put it in their 3300lb car and run 8.80's,,, look at westcott's stick car making a lil under 1000 running 8.20's in a 3200lb car,,, those guys with over 1000 prob really had a lil over 900
Exactly!!!!!!
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: Performance Only]
#897882
01/07/11 07:45 PM
01/07/11 07:45 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 193
Houston, TX
rick55
member
|
member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 193
Houston, TX
|
Quote:
would love to know what kind of dyno that was. not many model dyno's that can handle that much power.
No one makes a dyno that can reliably stand up to 3500hp, so they have taken parts and pieces of different brands and fabricated many other parts and pieces to make a dyno that will handle 3500hp+. S basically they have a custom one off. Steve's motor dynoed just under 3500hp.
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: rick55]
#897883
01/07/11 07:51 PM
01/07/11 07:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Quote:
would love to know what kind of dyno that was. not many model dyno's that can handle that much power.
No one makes a dyno that can reliably stand up to 3500hp, so they have taken parts and pieces of different brands and fabricated many other parts and pieces to make a dyno that will handle 3500hp+. S basically they have a custom one off. Steve's motor dynoed just under 3500hp.
what does it run at the track 
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: Get-X]
#897888
01/08/11 09:57 AM
01/08/11 09:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,917
A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,917
A shed in England
|
Quote:
Quote:
if you dont mind could/would you give a run down on the combo of parts used?? if you dont mind..looking at diff. set up and like to yes whats working for those that are doing it..thanks mike
car
weight
engine spec
trans
gear
tire
this is what my buddy is planned out so far not set in stone ye  t...
dodge stratus tube chasiss car..being worked on now
world block
572 with 572heads poprted and polished
762 lift cam with jesal 1.6 rocker
intake ????
piston ?????
rod ?????
crank?????
trans glide
ford 9" rear coil over 4 link
looking for at lease a 1000hp or more for the combo on this build...
It takes a good engine to make 1000+. By that I mean 410+ cfm heads, 15:1+ comp., .800+ cam lift with serious valve springs. Should also consider using titanium intake valves. I'd use GRP rods around 7" and a 4.5 stroke Callies Magnum crank. I'd use the 440-3x intake and someones custom carb (Cubic, Books, ProSystems).
 You need to speak to Best Machine for CNC porting on the 572-13, then you'll have the potential in those heads 
BTW we aren't anywhere near 1000 hp (yet  )
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: Tig]
#897889
01/08/11 02:28 PM
01/08/11 02:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
RT540
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
|
Ok, I will play to..
I plan on making my 540 nitrous only, but will start out with a different cam and and run N/A first.
Block megablock, 4.50 bore
crank 4.25
alum. rods BME 7.15
Pistons CP flat top 14:1
Cam Intake lift with 1.8 ratio 0,792", Exh 0,774"
Intake dur 280° Exh. 289, LSA 112
Rockers T&D separate 1.8
Tit. intake valves 2.30 (+0,100 both int and ex)
Psi1248 tripple springs installed at 2.10"
B1 originals, fully ported by RAD racing
Single cast B1, ported
1050 AD, 9375 three circ.
I am hoping for at least 950 hp.
How much would a good 1250 carb help, like the new ultra hp ?
The cam is new and 10 years old, would it benefit with more ex dur. ?
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: RT540]
#897890
01/08/11 03:51 PM
01/08/11 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Alberta Canada
Edge
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Alberta Canada
|
Not sure if we will hit 1000 hp but that is the target and we should not be to far below
Aluminum world block 4.50 bore
crank 4.50
I beam rods 7.100
Pistons CP 15:1
Cam Intake lift with 0,806", Exh 0,798"
Intake dur 284° Exh. 292, LSA 112
B1 originals, fully ported
Single cast B1, ported
2000 cfm throttle body
BS3 EFI methanol
Peterson 5 stage dry sump
25.1E Duster should end up 2450
5 speed lenco
Ford 4.30 rear
32 tall tire
76 Duster
work in progress
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: earthmover]
#897892
01/08/11 04:24 PM
01/08/11 04:24 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Alberta Canada
Edge
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 698
Alberta Canada
|
I think the I beam vs H beam boils down to personal preference as there are advantages and disadvantages to both designs. Make sure you have a quality oiling system, bearings, pins, and hardware on the rods as these are the often the frequent sources of rod failures and not necessarily the design itself. imho
76 Duster
work in progress
|
|
|
Re: 1000 hp guys or better
[Re: earthmover]
#897895
01/08/11 05:06 PM
01/08/11 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
RT540
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
|
Quote:
just asking why the i beams and not the h beams??? i thought the i beams would not stand up the this kinda power just asking i dont know...thanks mike nice by the way 
If I ever put a steel rod in a high hp aplication, it would be Oliver parabolic, which is a I-beam.
I am a firm belivier in alum. rods though.
|
|
|
|
|
. The MPH will show this better than ET, maybe you need a new engine builder? give us a call I know we can pick it up 
) shouldn't throw stones 
