440-1 iron heads. Bad idea?
#875628
12/09/10 03:39 PM
12/09/10 03:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 149 Rancho Cucamonga,Ca
392charger
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 149
Rancho Cucamonga,Ca
|
We need some advice. We are looking to build a fun street brawler and thinking about installing this 440 into my sons 69 GTX (has a 383 now),and need some advice on the head selection. It's a standard bore short block I picked up several years ago, already assembled with new coated hyperutectics(.090 in the hole), LY rods w/ARP bolts and a EX275HL comp cam. We have some 906's in nice shape that we could use, but we also have some iron 440-1's(complete kit w/dual plane intake, step headers 2 to 2 1/8, max wedge ports) too. Had the -1 heads checked out yesterday and the shop says all else is good but the intake valves are sunk. They suggest upping the valve size from the 2.190's to 2.250 to fix them. IIRC this should be around 9.3 compression at .090 in the hole with the 75cc chambers. Should we stick with the 906's(and compression in the 8's) or will the -1's work okay? My concern is the -1's will be over kill for this motor and be a big dissapointment with a lazy bottom end. It's an auto with a Hughes 3000 stall, 355 gears, 750 holley w/ Pro Form main body. Thanks for any and all suggestions.
|
|
|
Re: 440-1 iron heads. Bad idea?
[Re: 392charger]
#875630
12/09/10 04:14 PM
12/09/10 04:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
... the -1's will be over kill for this motor and be a big dissapointment with a lazy bottom end...
There's your answer.
|
|
|
Re: 440-1 iron heads. Bad idea?
[Re: 392charger]
#875633
12/09/10 04:50 PM
12/09/10 04:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,098 A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,098
A Banana Republic near you.
|
Quote:
Thanks for the pointers guys. Looks like these heads would be graet for a stroker, not so hot for a mild street motor.
With the low compression and the 906's your disappointment factor won't be much lower .
|
|
|
Re: 440-1 iron heads. Bad idea?
[Re: 392charger]
#875634
12/11/10 11:22 PM
12/11/10 11:22 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54 SW Iowa
gearhead452
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
SW Iowa
|
Here’s some real world experience. I have been running an engine which is somewhat similar to what you are proposing since 2002. I wanted a drivable street motor and wanted to use up a bunch of leftover parts from other projects. A lot of “mis-matched” parts…Here’s the combo:
Unported Indy 440-C (cast iron 440-1’s) with the bigger intake valve and Indy’s crappy 1.5 rockers Indy single plane 4150 intake (440-2) Holley 830 DP carb ’67 RB 440 HP block (.030 over) Wiseco flat top pistons, .990 pin Manley steel rods Stock forged 3.75 crank Hooker Super Comp 1 7/8" headers (with lots of “hammer time”) Hughes solid flat tappet cam (HEV3945BS) lift int – 0.546, ex. – 0.560, duration, int. 239, ex 245 at .050. Smallest Hughes solid available at the time IIRC Old MP tach drive dist. w/ MSD box Coan “Maximum Performance” 10” off the shelf street converter (COA-40320) stall is about 2800 rpm. 4.10 gears 3” exhaust with Cherry Bomb “Vortex” mufflers
Compression ratio is 10.2 to 1, using the “total fill” method to calculate. The car is a ’68 b-body that weighs 3875 with me in it. Quarter mile, it has gone an 11.72 at 115 mph through the exhaust (with slicks). Is this slow for a car with 440-1 heads? I suppose it is. But, I wasn’t really too worried about that (well not too much!). On a sticky track it will pull the left front tire. It idles smooth (but still sounds nice) and starts easy and doesn’t get hot on the street. With street tires it will blow tires away at will, from idle on up – low end torque and responsiveness is not a problem! It bolted together very easily, nothing special. If I was going to change anything, I would use a bigger cam (this one idles really smooth) and get some headers designed to run with the angled plug (there weren’t any available when I built this thing, I don’t think). IMO, it would be difficult to get the same results this easy with a 906 head, everything else being the same. Your results may vary.
|
|
|
|
|