|
Re: LED lighting........
[Re: Cudajon]
#828035
10/12/10 10:27 AM
10/12/10 10:27 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 396 Queens N.Y.
diesel1114
super street
|
super street
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 396
Queens N.Y.
|
hey if your looking for led tail lights this guys is the man , he did my led tail lights/ revers light in my 68 coronet and they are un real , simply the best , his name is larry and he can make any led light you want heres his link also http://www.northwestmustang.com/tell him the guys in nyc sent you
JOHN WS23L8GXXXXXX
|
|
|
Re: LED lighting........
[Re: bee71mopar]
#828037
10/12/10 01:29 PM
10/12/10 01:29 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 182 Columbia, Missouri
dtedler
member
|
member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 182
Columbia, Missouri
|
Check these out for the front. I'm just bringing them to market for the Challenger and Chargers. I'm doing the 68 and 69 Chargers right now. 72-73 Cudas are after this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nactAwM4WtwAs far as your side marker lights, they should be a 168 bulb and are available at your local truck stop for $7.99 for a pair. As far as the tail lights go - I'm using Larry's stuff from Northwest Mustang. Great guy and his boards are nicely done.
|
|
|
Re: LED lighting........
[Re: bee71mopar]
#828038
10/12/10 01:39 PM
10/12/10 01:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,096 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,096
Valencia, España
|
I haven't find any LED bulb to get totally satisfied.
Main reason is, our lights housings are not set to the LEDS lights projection. You need allmost a 300º degrees light projection to set fine the lense ilumination.
yes they are brighter, but focused straight forward Thats the reason why they are brighter, maybe same lumens focused at just one point instead all around.
The only advantage for those is the low consumption
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
|