Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
early 360 block thickness (sonic test) #760643
07/29/10 08:39 AM
07/29/10 08:39 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
andy3965 Offline OP
member
andy3965  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
i dropped my '73 standard bore 360 block off at the machine shop tuesday and the machinest stuck his sonic tester in a couple of the cylinders for a quick look and said "wow you got a good thick block".I asked what the numbers were and he said ".276 thrust .240 non-trust". if these numbers hold true for all the cylinders can it go to a 4.1" bore? i've heard that the early 360 blocks were built on the 340 tooling and could go the same bore as .60 over 340 (4.1"). i don't know how to do the math to find out max bore size. i'm just gonna go .30 over now but would be nice to know that it had 2 more rebuilds left in it. thanks, Andy


MOPAR BORN,MOPAR BRED,AND WHEN I DIE I'LL BE MOPAR DEAD!!!
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760644
07/29/10 08:49 AM
07/29/10 08:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,013
Finally a HUSKER again
Moparnut426 Offline
I Live Here
Moparnut426  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,013
Finally a HUSKER again
Quote:

i dropped my '73 standard bore 360 block off at the machine shop tuesday and the machinest stuck his sonic tester in a couple of the cylinders for a quick look and said "wow you got a good thick block".I asked what the numbers were and he said ".276 thrust .240 non-trust". if these numbers hold true for all the cylinders can it go to a 4.1" bore? i've heard that the early 360 blocks were built on the 340 tooling and could go the same bore as .60 over 340 (4.1"). i don't know how to do the math to find out max bore size. i'm just gonna go .30 over now but would be nice to know that it had 2 more rebuilds left in it. thanks, Andy





Why waste your block for a few cubes? You are not going to gain a whole bunch just from a max over bore.

But to answer your question, If they are all that thick, then I guess ya could. But remember that limits the block, and if something happends you might have to start over.



Kasey

Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: Moparnut426] #760645
07/29/10 10:01 AM
07/29/10 10:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
E
emarine01 Offline
master
emarine01  Offline
master
E

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
We had several early blocks tested, they seem to be hit or miss, you need to check all cyls, one thin wall can set you way back, the most we have cut a 360 block has been .060 on a 73 block, I don't know on the tooling thing between 340s & 360s sharing the same walls

Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: emarine01] #760646
07/29/10 04:54 PM
07/29/10 04:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
andy3965 Offline OP
member
andy3965  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
as stated in the original post i am only going .30 over. just wanted to know if i would be able to get two more rebuilds out of it. 4.06 & 4.10? or possibably 4.08?


MOPAR BORN,MOPAR BRED,AND WHEN I DIE I'LL BE MOPAR DEAD!!!
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760647
07/29/10 06:09 PM
07/29/10 06:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,013
Finally a HUSKER again
Moparnut426 Offline
I Live Here
Moparnut426  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,013
Finally a HUSKER again
ooops,

Sorry speed read the post. Id say .030 would be fine. And from there, you can go .010 increments unless its really trashed.

I know you can custom order diamond pistons in any size, and they arent much more than a set size as a comparison.

My pistons were cuatom, and only like $40 bucks mor for the set. They opened my valve reliefs up for the 2.08 valves, and made them with the small chevy pinn size.

Kasey

Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760648
07/29/10 06:59 PM
07/29/10 06:59 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines Offline
master
CompWedgeEngines  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
After three .030 rebuilds, which unless someone REALLY screws up, should never happen, you'd be at .231 thrust and .195 non thrust, which is very good. The problem as mentioned is, make sure ALL bores are sonic checked. You often get to the last cylinder and find its something stupid like .070 between cylinders.Check them all, if it maintains that kind of number, you have an exceptional block.


RIP Monte Smith

Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.

WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760649
07/29/10 07:29 PM
07/29/10 07:29 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
C
ccarson Offline
enthusiast
ccarson  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 293
Michigan
I also have an early 1971 360 block, I dont have the inspection sheet in front of me, but if I recall, when we had it sonic checked the worst Thrust surface was .260"
Yes I have heard the early 360 blocks were cast using the 340 cores.
I wanted to bore mine .060" so with the 4.125" Stroke I would end up with a 426 but was talked out of it and we only went .030"

Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: ccarson] #760650
07/29/10 08:35 PM
07/29/10 08:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
andy3965 Offline OP
member
andy3965  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
thanks for the info guys, i was just thinking about rebuilds using off the shelf sizes.this 408 i'm building is going in my '75 shortbox d100. i have a set of w2 econos with light port job(don't have flow numbers, they at the machine shop now getting flowed) and i bought a custon bullet solid lift cam from ryanj. gonna use a victor intake, flat top pistons,gonna stay in the 10.5 range on compression.ryan said my combo will be about 550-570hp and around 530 tq. should be a nice motor for my truck.going to be a street truck with the ocassional run down the strip

Last edited by andy3965; 07/30/10 02:38 PM.

MOPAR BORN,MOPAR BRED,AND WHEN I DIE I'LL BE MOPAR DEAD!!!
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760651
07/29/10 09:55 PM
07/29/10 09:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
cbarracuda Offline
mopar
cbarracuda  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
340 and 360 up to 1973 74 are made of a hi nickel alloy,the same material used in chryslers race blocks.Early 73 74 have more material in the cylinder bore and are heavier duty.Those early 360 are special case, they used 4 inches bore but the block was made with 340 water jacket core this means that these blocks can be bore to 340 size

Last edited by cbarracuda; 07/29/10 09:58 PM.
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: cbarracuda] #760652
07/29/10 10:05 PM
07/29/10 10:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
andy3965 Offline OP
member
andy3965  Offline OP
member

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 162
monticello,ms
thats some good info. that makes me feel real good about this block. its strong and thick,and i'm adding a hughes girdle. so this thing should have a strong bottom end.


MOPAR BORN,MOPAR BRED,AND WHEN I DIE I'LL BE MOPAR DEAD!!!
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: andy3965] #760653
07/30/10 12:55 AM
07/30/10 12:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,518
pacific northwest
S
Stroker Scamp Offline
master
Stroker Scamp  Offline
master
S

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,518
pacific northwest
that block is thick compared to mine, your fine with what you want to do, my block was in the 200's some spots lower, good perhaps, not, but its still together,


footbrake N/A SB 408 Scamp 10.10 @ 132 street/strip
73 Duster 340 street strip 12.79 @ 105
Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: Stroker Scamp] #760654
07/30/10 01:04 AM
07/30/10 01:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc
E
earthmover Offline
top fuel
earthmover  Offline
top fuel
E

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,449
nc
so my 340 thats 40 over should be fine if i sonic it...lol i want to build a (416) or what ever that comes out to be 422 i think not sure but 340 with 4.00 stroke and 40 over bore and flat tops and good rods rhs heads done to the max a good soild cam or roller should be 500/550 hp thanks mike

Re: early 360 block thickness (sonic test) [Re: earthmover] #760655
07/30/10 08:47 AM
07/30/10 08:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
My 360 out of my 76 Volare sonic checked enough to go .060". Don't remeber the numbers but its been together since the early 90s. Still in my Challenger.
Doug







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1