Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? #748659
07/15/10 01:44 AM
07/15/10 01:44 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Central Coast
P
Plumcrazyracing Offline OP
member
Plumcrazyracing  Offline OP
member
P

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Central Coast
I would assume that switching to the urethane lower control arm bushing is the way to go for drag race applications and obtaining smooth consistent weight transfer. What is everyones opinion on this?

71 duster, stock big block k frame, tubular upper control arms, santhuff's, and the torsion bars are the 340 resto bars if i remember right.

The upper control arm bushings are urethane, i just never changed the lowers.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Plumcrazyracing] #748660
07/15/10 01:47 AM
07/15/10 01:47 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
rebel Offline
master
rebel  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
don't know if there'd be any gains drag racing but carving out corners... yes!

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Plumcrazyracing] #748661
07/15/10 02:07 AM
07/15/10 02:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,283
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,283
Bend,OR USA
I have used two sets of complete PST poly kits, I was not able to use the lower control arm bushings in either car because of the pin that goes throughthe K member would not tighten up in the poly bushings. I ended up buying a set of the Moog lower control arm bushings and installed them this was on 1973 and later A body parts for the bigger brakes and bigger ball joints and so on


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Cab_Burge] #748662
07/15/10 05:18 AM
07/15/10 05:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ


if you get new pivots you can get the ones Just Suspension has that have the correct OD, and they also have 2 flats on them for tightening.

IMO the poly do not bind and allow a more friction free front end.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Plumcrazyracing] #748663
07/15/10 07:03 AM
07/15/10 07:03 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
For weight transfer I'd think loose old rubber would be the best. Or. urethane bushing that are left loose enough that they slip along the bolts rather than flex.

I usually have an argument with the suspension guys every time I order a front end kit. They are amazed anyone would want rubber over urethane.

It goes like this:

Them: Rubber is cheap, that's why OEM's use it!

Me: Actually,vulcanizing rubber and bonding it to steel is much more expensive - that's why you aftermarket guys use urethane.

Them: Rubber is cheap, that's why the OEM's use it!

Me: So an $85,000 Lexus, a $110,000 Mercedes, and a $135,000 Porsche all use rubber to save a few cents when they are simultaneously adopting electronic active suspensions, sound deadened laminated steel,and a million other tricks in an effort to get the most of the car? I think they'd be smart enough to spend $5 on urethane and drop the $3,200 active suspension if that were the case.

And what does a Viper use?

Them: Urethane out performs rubber!

Me: Well, it does on a track car, maybe, but it hurts ride quality and durability.

Them: Urethane outlasts rubber!

Me: It does as a compound sitting on a shelf but not when installed in a suspension. We've all seen rubber bushing last decades - where is your decades of proof on urethane? We've all seen urethane squeeze and cut itself right out of a bushing sleeve.

Them: Urethane improves the suspension!

Me: Actually, it just changes the suspension arbitrarily. Rubber is bonded to the
steel sleeves for 'flex'. Urethane is not - it just acts as a big hinge. During a medium-to-big move in suspension position it you have created two friction surfaces; can't be so great for that to happen.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: GregCon] #748664
07/15/10 07:36 AM
07/15/10 07:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
the rubber in the bushings are not bonded to the shells...

also the rubber does not rotate in the lower pivot - it flex's - thats why you have to have weight on it and tighten it down or you rip it. Since the rubber only flexes so much it will bind and be more friction during excessive suspension travel ( at the launch )

A poly setup will rotate, not bind when you have excessive weight transfer.

Without the t-bar hooked up there is a night and day difference from rubber to poly in terms of suspension travel.

Want even more friction free travel? Get a set of jointed strut rods, that is the next place you can get alot of travel, they also keep your alignment in more consistent locations during excessive suspension travel.


Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: DJVCuda] #748665
07/15/10 08:52 AM
07/15/10 08:52 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,491
Oologah, Oklahoma
Big Squeeze Offline
pro stock
Big Squeeze  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,491
Oologah, Oklahoma
Quote:

the rubber in the bushings are not bonded to the shells...

also the rubber does not rotate in the lower pivot - it flex's - thats why you have to have weight on it and tighten it down or you rip it. Since the rubber only flexes so much it will bind and be more friction during excessive suspension travel ( at the launch )

A poly setup will rotate, not bind when you have excessive weight transfer.

Without the t-bar hooked up there is a night and day difference from rubber to poly in terms of suspension travel.

Want even more friction free travel? Get a set of jointed strut rods, that is the next place you can get alot of travel, they also keep your alignment in more consistent locations during excessive suspension travel.







I agree 100%.........The only reason I see to use rubber is because you want a quieter/smoother ride.......Here's a link to another thread where this was just talked about........


If you can't handle the truth, you're living a lie.......
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: DJVCuda] #748666
07/15/10 09:09 AM
07/15/10 09:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

the rubber in the bushings are not bonded to the shells...

also the rubber does not rotate in the lower pivot - it flex's - thats why you have to have weight on it and tighten it down or you rip it. Since the rubber only flexes so much it will bind and be more friction during excessive suspension travel ( at the launch )

A poly setup will rotate, not bind when you have excessive weight transfer.

Without the t-bar hooked up there is a night and day difference from rubber to poly in terms of suspension travel.

Want even more friction free travel? Get a set of jointed strut rods, that is the next place you can get alot of travel, they also keep your alignment in more consistent locations during excessive suspension travel.






This is where a few of us have had different poly
bushings... I see that a few are using a poly insert
where the ones I tried had the poly bonded to the
shells both inner and outer SO if its a bonded style
it was a VERY STIFF bushing... much stiffer than a
oem style rubber.... BUT I can see them IF its a
insert where it can pivot.... so for drag racing the
insert style could be beneficial.... but I havent
tested any myself.... YET

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: MR_P_BODY] #748667
07/15/10 09:03 PM
07/15/10 09:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
The rubber in many cases is indeed bonded to the shell. On my Lexus SC and GS's they are bonded, for example.

In cases where it isn't, such as Mopar control arms, the fit is so tight it acts as would a bonded fit. I've never seen a urethane bushing in nearly as tight a fit. The flexing is a key part of the suspension action.

In addition to all the benefits of rubber I mentioned, there is also the fact that rubber can be produced in different durometers to allow tuning. Urethane can't/isn't.

Vipers, Corvettes, 911's, Camaros, Challengers, etc. all use rubber. That's gotta tell you something.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: GregCon] #748668
07/15/10 09:31 PM
07/15/10 09:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,489
Pacifica, CA
Devilbrad Offline
top fuel
Devilbrad  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,489
Pacifica, CA
Quote:

The rubber in many cases is indeed bonded to the shell. On my Lexus SC and GS's they are bonded, for example.

In cases where it isn't, such as Mopar control arms, the fit is so tight it acts as would a bonded fit. I've never seen a urethane bushing in nearly as tight a fit. The flexing is a key part of the suspension action.

In addition to all the benefits of rubber I mentioned, there is also the fact that rubber can be produced in different durometers to allow tuning. Urethane can't/isn't.

Vipers, Corvettes, 911's, Camaros, Challengers, etc. all use rubber. That's gotta tell you something.




Until they get serious at the track and convert to poly, delrin, del-alum or steel monoballs. Rubber is great for keeping warranty costs down on new cars when the uppity millionaire types complain about squeeks and rattles.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: GregCon] #748669
07/15/10 09:41 PM
07/15/10 09:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

The flexing is a key part of the suspension action.





you had me till there - FLEX is NOT a key part of any suspension system no way , shape , or form....

suspension TRAVEL yes... flex? no way!

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Plumcrazyracing] #748670
07/15/10 11:44 PM
07/15/10 11:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 377
NW Indiana USA
727specialist Offline
enthusiast
727specialist  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 377
NW Indiana USA
I asked the guys at calverts that when I got my shocks. They said they use rubber,,,, not poly.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: 727specialist] #748671
07/16/10 12:19 AM
07/16/10 12:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX


I don't mean lateral flex or torsional flex, I mean flexing in the radial direction. It definitely is an integral part of a suspension system. It's more controlled and longer lasting for a bushing to flex radially than to rotate around an axis. In other words, the movement occur in the flex, not in the sliding of two surfaces.

As for racing Vipers...they use urethane because it gives them some small edge in handling - but it does so at the expense of long life, ride quality, and perhaps noise. Those things don't matter on a purely racing car. We all know on a race car compromises are made in the pursuit of a solitary goal - that's nothing new or unique.

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: GregCon] #748672
07/16/10 12:28 AM
07/16/10 12:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,382
Las Vegas
For a drag race application rubber is best. Not debating just stating what i have seen on many occasions with customer cars in the past.


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Al_Alguire] #748673
07/16/10 03:43 AM
07/16/10 03:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,474
So Cal
autoxcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
autoxcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,474
So Cal
In my experiance the poly LCA bushing did not fit the old outer rubber bushing shell left in the LCA. So I had to carefully sand scroll the old bushing shell and dress the new poly bushing.

IMHO, different aftermarket rubber LCA bushing shells vary in thickness. So some poly LCA bushing will slide in, and some will not.

The A-body LCA pin in the center with the egg shape can not be used with poly LCA bushings. The LCA pins are dressed with a fine de-burring wheel then polished on a buffer.

These were installed on the car in 1999 about 40K miles ago. They don't squeak.




6088649-PolyLCAbushings.jpg (1389 downloads)
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Al_Alguire] #748674
07/16/10 08:35 AM
07/16/10 08:35 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,491
Oologah, Oklahoma
Big Squeeze Offline
pro stock
Big Squeeze  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,491
Oologah, Oklahoma
Quote:

For a drag race application rubber is best. Not debating just stating what i have seen on many occasions with customer cars in the past.




But, you ARE debating......but didn't say WHY it was better I don't see how a shaft that has to twist rubber to move is going to be better than a shaft that just spins in rubber???

When they're bolted up to the car, you can actually move the LCA up and down by hand with poly whereas with rubber, you can't......


If you can't handle the truth, you're living a lie.......
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Big Squeeze] #748675
07/17/10 02:14 AM
07/17/10 02:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Central Coast
P
Plumcrazyracing Offline OP
member
Plumcrazyracing  Offline OP
member
P

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 184
Central Coast
Wow, lots of feedback and a topic for discussion. I just pulled out the lower RUBBER control arm bushings and they were tore. Both sides. I would think that they were not working properly and affecting my weight transfer. Maybe even causing more of a bind

Put the URETHANE in and as mentioned, with the pivot pin tightened up, i could move the control arm pretty freely. We'll see how it works at the track.

Steve

Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: Plumcrazyracing] #748676
07/17/10 07:17 AM
07/17/10 07:17 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 162
Greentown Indiana
M
moparmxz Offline
member
moparmxz  Offline
member
M

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 162
Greentown Indiana
I put urethane lowers in my car several years ago,i was not impressed. My car started wearing the front tires out in a couple months,now maybe they have improved them but the ones i had looked just like the ones pictured.I went back to rubber and all has been well for years,i noticed no difference in how the car worked either way.I do run the urethane in the uppers with no issues.


Randy Brough 1967 440 Dart S/P 6.37 106mph best eighth 3150 lbs
Re: Lower control arm bushings.... Urethane or rubber? [Re: moparmxz] #748677
07/17/10 07:37 AM
07/17/10 07:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
I run poly on an E with the greasable pins (Firm Feel). They are holding up fine and no noise. I did have a gap between the bushing and LCA on one side as posted above which threw the alignment off. I added adjustable strut rods and it is dialed right in now. Rubber is more forgiving in this regard.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1