Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: HYPER8oSoNic]
#712411
05/31/10 04:01 PM
05/31/10 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936 own private Idaho
ngpSatellite
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936
own private Idaho
|
Quote:
Quote:
which would you recommend??? price does not matter.its a pure stock 383HP 1969 RR eng
650 for good street/mileage manners, 800 for more performance with minor mods (cam,intake,exhaust). Save compression for a toss-up choice (mileage vs. power), depending on the pump gas.
ahhhhh... hey thanks for the advice... just want a cruzer with little punch... leaning towards a 650..
|
|
|
Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: JohnRR]
#712413
05/31/10 04:12 PM
05/31/10 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936 own private Idaho
ngpSatellite
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936
own private Idaho
|
Quote:
650 is how it was equipped originally , if it's stock stay with the 650
thats what I was thinking ... stock exhaust... the whole bit.. org pistons and cam... std bore the only diff is a eddy performer which is not a big upgrade??
|
|
|
Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#712417
06/01/10 12:28 AM
06/01/10 12:28 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
come ooon... stock 400s came with 850 cfms! ( so do same years 440s ) and 340s since 71/72 came with 800 cfms! carbs ( TQ )
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: NachoRT74]
#712418
06/01/10 12:53 AM
06/01/10 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221 Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
Quote:
come ooon... stock 400s came with 850 cfms! ( so do same years 440s ) and 340s since 71/72 came with 800 cfms! carbs ( TQ )
Squarebores & spreadbores react totally different from one another, so they can't be compaired as equals when your talking CFM, its apples too oranges, you can always get away with a larger CFM carb on a given app. if useing a spreadbore over a squarebore, i'm just talking vacuum controlled units, not DPers.
|
|
|
Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: dustergirl340]
#712421
06/01/10 12:13 PM
06/01/10 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
I can say you can make a big mistake between a secondary vacuums or double pumper on an engine, but I don't think really between spreadbore or squarebore, or sequential over simultaneous... differences ? yes, they get diff responses ones over the others, then the quality of the piece and you must match the response you want with cam and timming, but not that big I think to "overcarb" just with CFM spec... I'm just being logical, not talking about the experience of course.
we got also 6packs on 340s ( 1000 cfms ), true just the center is the pumper
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: avs 650 or 800 carb for a stock 383HP?????????
[Re: dustergirl340]
#712422
06/01/10 01:57 PM
06/01/10 01:57 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221 Branson, Mo.
joedust451
super gas
|
super gas
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
|
Quote:
People tend to overcarb. My 340 ET's best with a 650 Holley.
, so does mine, & it also runs cleaner & doesn't foul plugs, even if i jet it up.
|
|
|
|
|