Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll #678113
04/23/10 12:10 PM
04/23/10 12:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline OP
master
Fury Fan  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
For those that have already responded or subscribed to the below thread and are interested in putting Ford 5.0 EFI onto their Mopar, please answer the following questions. This will help gauge what future discussions we might need regarding mods for fuel and air.

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=0&Number=5911038&page=0

what intake manifold will you use?
multiple choice
Votes accepted starting: 04/23/10 11:03 AM
what engine will you install on?
multiple choice
Votes accepted starting: 04/23/10 11:03 AM
will you attempt it?
single choice
Votes accepted starting: 04/23/10 11:03 AM

Parts I seek: driver doorpanel, 65 Sport Fury, prefer black, needs to be 7-8 on 10 scale, might buy set 16" x 6" Dodge truck wheel(s), from early 70s?, takes 9" dogdish - need for a research job so cheaper is better. 69-73 C-body caliper brackets and/or splashields Send a PM.
Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Fury Fan] #678114
04/23/10 12:13 PM
04/23/10 12:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
after reading all that mess on the 5.9 EFI post, I run away form anything that complicated. It adds zero to the performace/driveabilty of a vehicle. If I did a EFI swap it would be on a 360 based magnum and I'd use the factory aftermarket performace computer and be done. That or buy a complete ready to wire in kit.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678115
04/23/10 12:18 PM
04/23/10 12:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
I didn't read thru your whole efi thread, but how far can you modify an engine before the ecu needs to be recalibrated? Because right off the hop you'd need to recalibrate to get the ignition timing to suit your combo, even if the maf can cover fueling on a mild motor. I know from past experience that even 80's stock ecus are a nightmare in terms of their overcomplicated programming for fuel and spark. I've seen enough there to know a cheapie megasquirt is simple in comparisin.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678116
04/23/10 12:19 PM
04/23/10 12:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline OP
master
Fury Fan  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
For someone that doesn't like EFI you sure follow that thread like a hawk! I guess it's like a really fat woman - you don't want to go near it , but yet you can't stop looking at it!

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Fury Fan] #678117
04/23/10 12:45 PM
04/23/10 12:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

For someone that doesn't like EFI you sure follow that thread like a hawk! I guess it's like a really fat woman - you don't want to go near it , but yet you can't stop looking at it!




nothing wrong w/ full figured biggies... however you are talking about extensive modifications that financially don't make sense. If it was a SBC there are a number of "plug-n-go" kits that offer no real performance gains, but they don't crush your wallet. How much time does it take to creat such a "Frankenstein" product? And if you burn a wire or a sensor goes south then what?

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678118
04/23/10 01:11 PM
04/23/10 01:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Yuck, EFI makes forced induction soooo much nicer to drive.

Dumping ANY kind of money in these old cars is throwing it away. You never get your money back. Why not build what you want instead of what other people think you should have? It's your money. Do what you want with it. Let others spend theirs the way they see fit.

Go back to your points and condenser and leave the EFI guys alone.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: feets] #678119
04/23/10 01:32 PM
04/23/10 01:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Yuck, EFI makes forced induction soooo much nicer to drive.

Dumping ANY kind of money in these old cars is throwing it away. You never get your money back. Why not build what you want instead of what other people think you should have? It's your money. Do what you want with it. Let others spend theirs the way they see fit.

Go back to your points and condenser and leave the EFI guys alone.




yes, that's about the only reason I'd do EFI and probably will on my next build. However I'm not going to try and cobble parts and pieces from 20 different manufactures to do it. I'll buy something as complete as I can. Swaping a car over to Eletronic Ing is nothing like converting it to EFI. Apples to Oranges. He had a poll, I made a comment. Shoot I dropped 2k on a 6-pack because I wanted one. So I get that part of it.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678120
04/23/10 01:40 PM
04/23/10 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
why can't one just use one of these???


Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678121
04/23/10 01:44 PM
04/23/10 01:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline OP
master
Fury Fan  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
Thank-you, Feets! Been a fan of your work for soem time!

Yuck, you do realize that you talk out of both sides of your mouth sometimes, right?

You say EFI is too expensive, but you've got a bunch of money in a 6-pack when a single 4-V would've sufficed (just quoting your rhetoric). you did it because you wanted to, so let us experiment with EFI - because **we** want to.

Then you say you'll do EFI next but you'll buy a full kit -- which is far more expensive than any DIY setup.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678122
04/23/10 02:03 PM
04/23/10 02:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline OP
master
Fury Fan  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
Quote:

How much time does it take to creat such a "Frankenstein" product?




It'll take some time, there's no doubt about that, but I (and a few others, I suspect ) like to tinker and learn.

I could've gone out and bought a Holley Projection or an Edelbrock Victor kit and saved lots of time. Funny thing is, those don't have a good reputation for flexibility.

Maybe I'll fail at this, but long ago I learned that you'll never succeed at soemthing if you don't risk failure first.

Quote:

And if you burn a wire or a sensor goes south then what?




Then you fix it when you get home. One of the beauties of the 5.0 system is that it had a TON of OEM development (as do all the OEM systems), so it's got a lot of failsafes in it. Only 1-2 sensors can truly strand you - which is no different than a carb'd car.

No other sensor has ultimate authority. The ECU checks the sensors at every ignition cycle, it can determine when a sensor has fallen out of range, and if a sensor falls out of range it gets ignored. The ECU makes a good assumption of operating conditions from data from the other sensors and continues on down the road. You'll get data from TPS, IAT, CTS, MAP or MAF, VSS, O2 and tach. Lots of info!

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #678123
04/23/10 02:27 PM
04/23/10 02:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline OP
master
Fury Fan  Offline OP
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
Quote:

I didn't read thru your whole efi thread, but how far can you modify an engine before the ecu needs to be recalibrated? Because right off the hop you'd need to recalibrate to get the ignition timing to suit your combo, even if the maf can cover fueling on a mild motor. I know from past experience that even 80's stock ecus are a nightmare in terms of their overcomplicated programming for fuel and spark. I've seen enough there to know a cheapie megasquirt is simple in comparisin.



I'll be doing this on a mild 440, using a SD ECU, and I plan to increase injector size and tweak fuel pressure as needed to match the increased airflow. Based on discussions I've had with other people, MAP is MAP and unrelated to engine size/AFs as long as the correct amount of fuel is injected. My project has a small cam so it won't have the reversion that SD gets confused by.

Yes, ignition timing is a huge unknown, and I don't have any ideas on that yet. It's on my list of 'see if it's a problem before worrying about it'. The EGR can be turned off, which eliminates one big timing/fueling uncertainty.

I started digging into this Ford stuff about 2-3 years ago, but abandoned it for teh flexibility of Megasquirt (and to avoid the dizzy issue). I actually have 2 MS-IIs waiting on the shelf and that is the route I was headed before this 5.0 'wound' got reopened on me. I got some new ideas on the dizzy so I'm throwing a little time back into it. I grabbed an ECU and harness stub at teh JY recently (which can serve as a spare for my Lincoln), and any other required items can also be used with the MS. Not much $ lost in this experiment for me, only time, and I plan to live 'til I die.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Fury Fan] #678124
04/23/10 04:34 PM
04/23/10 04:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Thank-you, Feets! Been a fan of your work for soem time!

Yuck, you do realize that you talk out of both sides of your mouth sometimes, right?

You say EFI is too expensive, but you've got a bunch of money in a 6-pack when a single 4-V would've sufficed (just quoting your rhetoric). you did it because you wanted to, so let us experiment with EFI - because **we** want to.

Then you say you'll do EFI next but you'll buy a full kit -- which is far more expensive than any DIY setup.




Money I got, time I don't. Time = MONEY. I'd rather spend an extra $500 on something that is done than try and figure out how to make a pile of parts work. Plus a kit allows you some ease of mind. You have something all put pieced together, so what if one "home made" part goes bad? My days of saving $100 here and there are past.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678125
04/23/10 07:24 PM
04/23/10 07:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Some people don't have that option. Others, like me, enjoy building stuff.

I've got parts from Mercedes, Nissan, Ford, Cadillac, and even stuff from a fork lift on my car. It's a hot rod in the true sense of the word. Despite being ugly as sin, it's been featured in two magazines, used for background in a TV show, and now has a bit part in a rock and roll music video.

Sometimes there simply nothing wrong with taking your own path.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: feets] #678126
04/23/10 11:28 PM
04/23/10 11:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,888
Oregon
hooziewhatsit Offline
master
hooziewhatsit  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,888
Oregon
At this point, I have more time than money, so I don't mind spending time 'cobbling' something together.

I hope to find a magnum 360, but I may end up having to go with an LA 360 instead. To save money initially I was considering using the stock mag intake (assuming I find a mag 360), although the hughes re-made beer barrel looks nice, but is $700 :-0

As for the question about how they can be recalibrated, I looked into using the Moates Quarterhorse (~$250 IIRC) and Binary Editer (~$50). The QH plugs into the ECU and 'overrides' the stock settings. BE is a program where you change the settings, then 'burn' them to the QH. This gives you complete control over all the stock settings. Change the firing order, fuel/air curves, spark curves, idle speed, etc. Looks pretty slick, IMO.

I'll pull my Ford harness when I get back home and get to work


If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.
Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: hooziewhatsit] #678127
04/23/10 11:38 PM
04/23/10 11:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
mark7171 Offline
pro stock
mark7171  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
LISTEN TO YOURSELF.

Can you do it ?

If you have "Mad Squabbles" now , then show it off.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: mark7171] #678128
04/24/10 12:20 AM
04/24/10 12:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Have you guys ever looked into the ignition timing tables on a stock 80's ecu? I have on the 80's chrysler 4cyl ecus, and let me tell you it's a nightmare. I just took a quick look at a calibration again, and there are at least a dozen seperate tables that control the ignition timing curve, and these tables over-ride and overlap each other depending on the input from all the other sensors. You don't even want to know how many seperate fueling tables there are! I somehow doubt the ford is any simpler.

With a speed density ecu, I think you will be in trouble. With a maf system I think you can get away with more. MAP is MAP, however a stock 5.0 is going to have a different VE over the tps vs rpm range than any 440, and it's not going to be a simple linear change. Perhaps the o2 correction can cover it during part-throttle and you can go up/down injector size and fuel pressure to cover the full throttle. I just don't think the 5.0 ecu is going to give you the cold start or accel enrichment you will need. I think it will run, but not all that well.

I'll give you a little bit of a real-world example for you just to think about a bit. The stock 80's mopar 2.2/2.5L non-turbo engines came with a tbi system with one fuel injector, where the turbo cars had mpi with 4 injectors. Several people on the fwd mopar web boards have tried to put a turbo mpi intake in place of their tbi system and have the tbi computer fire the 4 injectors. They sized down in injectors until all 4 = the flow of the single tbi injector. The result was it runs, but not well. This is a little different than what you're doing, but not that much of a stretch. Perhaps the ford efi system is more adaptable by nature.

I'm really thinking you're going to have to recalibrate it. If you send it in for a recalibration, you'll spend enough to push the $ of this project beyond that of a megasquirt. If you buy your own burner for 40-50 bucks you can do it yourself. But by the time you add up the costs of buying the burner and junkyard ecu and harness, I think you could have bought a megasquirt. A cheapie MS-1 can do fuel and spark for what $130? And a MS-2 is $250. I don't mean to rain on your parade or anything but there are some guys running chevy 350 ecus on other applications, however they have to recalibrate them before use. Whether all this is worth it, is up to you.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #678129
04/24/10 10:34 AM
04/24/10 10:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
Well, I am not sure how the real mustang system will work, and I don't know how different it is from a 360 to a 440, but when I was playing around with the painless system, and could not get my 5.9 to run with their base programming, I remembered people using the mustang systems before, so I slipped in the 5.0 tune program painless has for their perfect fit sytem and the car ran better.

Now granted, it I was running it on a different system. Not a MAF system at all. But the base timing and fuel tables worked pretty good for cold start and driving.
My only issues were the tables were a little lean, which the MAF should adjust for.
Spark was pretty good, but idle was a little low for my tastes.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Andrewh] #678130
04/24/10 03:43 PM
04/24/10 03:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
mark7171 Offline
pro stock
mark7171  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,261
ILL
You have found the joys of multiplexing. The fuel/timing maps interwoven on every level.

Did you get to CLOSED loop ? Was it even paying attention till you had enough time, reached a tempature, or found the O2 sensor signal sweeping?

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: Mr.Yuck] #678131
04/24/10 04:34 PM
04/24/10 04:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 182
Pennsylvania
C
cantspel Offline
member
cantspel  Offline
member
C

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 182
Pennsylvania


Money I got, time I don't. Time = MONEY. I'd rather spend an extra $500 on something that is done than try and figure out how to make a pile of parts work. Plus a kit allows you some ease of mind. You have something all put pieced together, so what if one "home made" part goes bad? My days of saving $100 here and there are past.





I would rather be stranded looking for a MAP sensor or a TPS for a Mustang than a needle and seat for a six pack or something for a mega-squirt system.
I hate carbs. I don't want to work on them or attempt to fix one. You made a comment about the driveablilty of a carb vs. the injection. Get real. The only thing I have left with a carb is my 06 Grizzley 4 wheeler and my 79 truck and both are a pain. Choke them, then let them warm up while easing the choke off and working the throttle. Give me a break. I'll take a port injected OBD2 car anyday.

Re: 5.0 Ford EFI retrofit poll [Re: mark7171] #678132
04/24/10 04:46 PM
04/24/10 04:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
A
Andrewh Offline
master
Andrewh  Offline
master
A

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
Quote:

You have found the joys of multiplexing. The fuel/timing maps interwoven on every level.

Did you get to CLOSED loop ? Was it even paying attention till you had enough time, reached a tempature, or found the O2 sensor signal sweeping?




If you are talking to me, then I don't think the system would have worked correctly without me doing some adjusting.
Again, I used the mustang tune which was setup for a maf sensor car, which the 5.9 magnum is not.
I was running a wide band o2 and it was adjusting based off of that, but it is only good for about a 10 percent change as I understand the painless setup.

AGain, not the same as the stock mustang computer, just pointing out that it isn't that far off, at least for a 360.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1