Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: derekeh]
#677601
04/22/10 10:12 PM
04/22/10 10:12 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,220 Someplace you aren't
SomeCarGuy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,220
Someplace you aren't
|
Where do you live? The 600 Eddy should get you the best MPG. You have problems if you get under 10 with that setup. Light car and high gears. I agree with the above. I have a good light and I can meet you in Louisville, Lex area or even Morehead. Might have an tuning kit for that 600 Eddy.
I want my fair share
|
|
|
Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: SomeCarGuy]
#677602
04/22/10 10:48 PM
04/22/10 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
For the carb: I'd suggest the thermoquad on the spreadbore and for the dist: 1st-more initial maybe ~12 to start (checked w vac adv disconnected) and experiment for the best initial (might use the vac guage method) and toss the thick spring w the long loop and replace w one of the light ones in the MP cellophane kit then shorten the slots to get ~36 total (again w vac adv disconnected) and you want the right combo of stiff/light springs to keep your eng just under the pinging point in your everyday driving style THEN hookup the vac adv & tune it to also stay just under the pinging point at a steady speed light throttle at a rpm where the springs are already maxed out. Only caveat is iirc TQ"s are manifold only. Set up the timing before the carb and do the dist sections in order and get each one near perfect before moving on to the next one. I'd have Demonsizzler here on Moparts rebuild/set up a TQ for you.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: derekeh]
#677603
04/22/10 11:13 PM
04/22/10 11:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
Your ign timing curve is very important for MPG. You will want a minimum of 15 degrees initial, probably more like 18*. You need to throw out the FSM thinking about timing. First off you need to find where your engine wants it's initial timing, disconect the vacume advance, set you idle mix screws to get the highest vaccume possible then advance the distributer from the stock setting till you get the highest vaccume reading then back off 1 or 2 degrees till it starts to drop then record what degrees it is at. Then you need to take that away from about 38 or 40 (max advance will be around 38-40 degrees)to find out how much advance your distributer needs to be set up inside. Then if you have the stock type distributer pop open the distributer and look at the number on the advance mechanisim, the number should be doubled to see how much timing advance it will give you. If it says 10 you will get 20 degrees advance and you should be real close, if it is a higher number you need to shorten te slots, if it is a lower number you need to lengthen the slots. Make sure the advance thingy can turn easily both directions on the distributer shaft, if not fix it, if it turns easy put the springs back in and make sure they pull it all the way back to the stops, then put it back together and install it back at the same initial timing setting you found earlier (around 18* or so) then you mechanical timing is set for best MPG, also while you are in the distributer make sure your vacume advance can is working and hopefully it has a low number on it like 5-9 that is the degrees advance it gets and it is also doubled at the crank, I have found through lots of testing that mopars like vaccume advance but not much when the mechanical advance is set right.
After you get that done I bet you will pick up a couple MPGs over the stock settings.
Then it is onto your carb, I like the factory AVS AFB and thermoquads, they can all deliver good MPGs and are all easy to tune, I prefer the t-quad but admitedly are harder to tune than te aluminum carbs. Basically set the idle mix screws for the highest vaccume setting and then lean out the midrange till it bogs and then richen it back up one step either a one size bigger jet or one size smaller main metering rods.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: 451Mopar]
#677608
04/23/10 12:46 PM
04/23/10 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
With your low gears, your RPMs will be so low that the the distrubitor probably never sees full advance? I would work on recurving the distrubitor for more initial advance, and make sure the vacuum advance is working.
The Edelbrock 600 should be fine. Depending on how the car runs, you could use weaker step-up springs (keeps the thicker part of the metering rod in the jet longer.)
i was actullay thinking that 3,23's might net you better milage
|
|
|
Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: derekeh]
#677609
04/23/10 01:25 PM
04/23/10 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,453 Florida STAYcation
dOoC
The village idiot's idiot
|
The village idiot's idiot
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,453
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
Right now I get considerably less than 10 mpg.
LESS than 10 mpg ? ...driving it EZ ?? ....
If yes .. there is something BIG-TIME wrong with the motor. How do the plugs read ?
|
|
|
Re: Help tuning a 383 for gas mileage
[Re: RapidRobert]
#677615
04/28/10 10:57 PM
04/28/10 10:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
I have not found lower gear to help city miledge, they only make the car more fun to drive. A lot of work is lost in an engine pulling pistons down with a lot of vaccume over them, running a higher gear means you have to push the throttle harder and that means less vaccume in the intake and over the pistons pulling them up while the crank if trying to pull them down. The only problem becaomes if you are running the engine so slow that fuel seperates from the mixture before it hits the cylinder, of course with the little bitty dinky ports in a stock big block head you can run a 383 pretty slow and still have some decent port velocity. A little more obvious problem with the higher gear if if you just hammer it all the time and make it stay in a lower gear, then you lose the benifit of the higher gearing.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
|
|