392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
#617850
02/19/10 01:43 PM
02/19/10 01:43 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88 Lawrence, KS
coledavis01
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Lawrence, KS
|
I've got a family friend that has had a 392 Hemi from a tattered New Yorker for quite some time now.He's hurting for money now and the gears started turning in my twisted head...I've got a 69 Bee that's still some time from being road ready w/ matching #'s. The car is a 383 w/ 727 & an N96 hood. Question is, has anyone done a 392 in a similar car? Would the 727 work with it? I'm assuming there would need to be some sort of adapter on the bellhousing at the very least. Also concerned about the height of the motor because of the airgrabber hood. Would the K-frame need modified to mount it? I'm not getting rid of the 383 but it does need rebuilt so I figured if I could get the motor for cheap, drop the 392 in with relative ease and not have to cut the car, why not? Thanks for your input! Cole
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: coledavis01]
#617851
02/19/10 02:03 PM
02/19/10 02:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,670 San Jose,CA
migsBIG
YouTube is my go-to news source
|
YouTube is my go-to news source
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,670
San Jose,CA
|
It has been done, and it's not a cheap upgrade.
Rebuilding the hemi isn't cheap and you will have to upgrade the front suspension due to those engine weight alot. Also, if you want power steering, you will need to have custom brackets made for it.
Then there is the carburation and linkage, that will set you back more money.
Radiator will have to have the inlet/outlet switched around to work with the cooling system.
motor mounts from poly powered b-bodies would be your best bet, but exspect those to need some modifications.
headers will be worth every bank account draining penny as those factory manifolds are very restrictive.
big block 727 wor'n work, but the 727 from a small block will work with the conversion.
In all, your looking at about $15,000 to do a proper conversion. For that kind of money, you may as well just buy a crate engine and pop it in. I had a friend who did the conversion in a similar year charger and has always regreted it. He feels like a moron everytime we bring up the car (the car still dosen't handle right).
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: 68GTS383]
#617857
02/19/10 06:59 PM
02/19/10 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88 Lawrence, KS
coledavis01
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 88
Lawrence, KS
|
Thanks for the info guys! I'll check out the hothemiheads site for sure...if I do get my hands on the motor we've got a 47 Chevrolet Aerosedan in line for restoration that could benefit from a beastly hemi in it. With the majority of old hot rods (regardless of brand) having nothing but sb chevys in them it'd be a nice change of pace. The cost to rebuild it is substantially higher than what I had anticipated but to open the hood of anything and see that monster in there would be worth it in my book. I guess what it comes down to is that if I am able to buy the motor from him, I won't be able to say no , just because it is a 392 Hemi! Maybe if the 'Bee wasn't matching numbers it'd be a reasonable endeavor but since it is, I agree with the previous comment that I'd be better off sticking with the perfectly capable 383. Cole
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: coledavis01]
#617858
02/19/10 07:41 PM
02/19/10 07:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Just my opinion.................. Early style Hemis look ENTIRELY out of place in later model Muscle Cars, it's been done before, it's not cheap to retrofit one into a later car, they are super heavy with the added wieght of those big iron heads (750lb range complete), and not very practical HP=$ wise. Plus, they will never be what people expect to see when you have "Hemi" advertised on the hood, you will get allot of down in the mouth comments like "Oh, it's not a real 426 Hemi" (maybe that won't bother you, but you WILL get them!). That being said, I think early Hemis are super cool in an older ride, In fact I have a 354 myself and it's going in my 57 Plymouth wagon just for fun. So, my advice? Go ahead and buy the 392, but find something else to put it in.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: cogen80]
#617860
02/19/10 11:02 PM
02/19/10 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,528 Southeast PA
5wndwcpe
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,528
Southeast PA
|
One word of advice, if you do decide to buy it, make absolutely sure of what you're buying. They made 15 different hemis back in the day and everyone thinks they have a 392, but it's rarely the case.
1968 GTX hardtop 1968 Sport Satellite Convertible 383/4spd 1933 Plymouth coupe 2002 Ram 2500 oil burner 4x4 2015 Grand Cherokee 2013 Challenger 1957 Chrysler Saratoga
Man...I need a bigger freakin' garage.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: 5wndwcpe]
#617861
02/20/10 02:49 AM
02/20/10 02:49 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
One word of advice, if you do decide to buy it, make absolutely sure of what you're buying. They made 15 different hemis back in the day and everyone thinks they have a 392, but it's rarely the case.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: coledavis01]
#617862
02/20/10 05:49 AM
02/20/10 05:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,883 Walla Walla, WA
Hemi_Jack
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,883
Walla Walla, WA
|
Quote:
It's called the elephant motor for a reason I suppose!
The 426 style hemi was the elephant motor. The early hemis were called whale motors.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: 68GTS383]
#617866
02/20/10 05:37 PM
02/20/10 05:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
You can spend 15 K on a conversion and it will be worth less than with the 383! If you want a Hemi then go with a new one. Then your Bee will be worth twice as much!
twice as much??? doubt you'll re-coup the cost of the Hemi build. Not bashing just facts.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: Dougsmopars]
#617868
02/20/10 05:59 PM
02/20/10 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714 Spokane Washington
ScottSmith_Harms
Mr Wizzard
|
Mr Wizzard
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 42,714
Spokane Washington
|
Quote:
It was in a 57 (couldve been 58) New Yorker.
FWIW 392 Hemi (single 4 barrel) was the only engine available in either year New Yorker.
A complete, stock, running "Core" 392 engine will sell for around 2-3K on average these days.
|
|
|
Re: 392 Hemi in a 69 Bee?
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#617869
02/20/10 08:47 PM
02/20/10 08:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,849 poplar bluff mo.
toplescuda
I Whine
|
I Whine
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,849
poplar bluff mo.
|
them older hemi,s weight a bunch i cant see it only weighing 40-60 pounds more then a small block chevy i had a 331 hemi and it weighed 780 pounds thats a lot of weight to be putting on the front end
1970 barracuda convert. 1 of 59 1970 pro street A.A.R. clone (panther pink) 1971 charger 2015 hellcat challenger. Redline red 2014 quad cab 4x4 ram 8 speed hemi
|
|
|
|
|