Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 11 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: mr2performance] #553080
12/17/09 10:45 PM
12/17/09 10:45 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
Quote:

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better , my old dusty 1985 dave morgan chassis tuning manual comes out of retirement, maybe this is the "data" he was referring to.......hmmmmmmm




Mike, I have an identical book but it doesn't say Dave Morgan in the upper left where yours is whited out.........

5674488-023b.jpg (26 downloads)
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: TS3303] #553081
12/17/09 10:46 PM
12/17/09 10:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan

5674494-022c.jpg (34 downloads)
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: TS3303] #553082
12/17/09 10:47 PM
12/17/09 10:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 729
Lebanon,IN
M
mr2performance Offline
super stock
mr2performance  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 729
Lebanon,IN
We need to Update the t-shirt!


MR2PERFORMANCE RACE CARS 765 483 9371
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: TS3303] #553083
12/17/09 10:52 PM
12/17/09 10:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 729
Lebanon,IN
M
mr2performance Offline
super stock
mr2performance  Offline
super stock
M

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 729
Lebanon,IN
Mine says Dave Morgan on it. He was sponsored by Alston back in the eighties (60's) though.


MR2PERFORMANCE RACE CARS 765 483 9371
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: mr2performance] #553084
12/17/09 10:55 PM
12/17/09 10:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline OP
I Win
Quicktree  Offline OP
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

Mine says Dave Morgan on it. He was sponsored by Alston back in the eighties (60's) though.



he worked for alston for many years. racepak has just come on board to sponsor him. imagine that, sponsoring somebody who doesn't know how to set pinion angle sombody needs to send calvert a t-shirt also along with spicer.

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Quicktree] #553085
12/17/09 11:01 PM
12/17/09 11:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,928
A tad North of Indy
B
Blown71X Offline
super gas
Blown71X  Offline
super gas
B

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,928
A tad North of Indy
My head hurts....anybody have any asprin


Blown71X V2.0 under construction 71 Cuda 383 4-SPD (maybe for sale) 2010 Challenger B5 Classic
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Quicktree] #553086
12/17/09 11:02 PM
12/17/09 11:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better , my old dusty 1985 dave morgan chassis tuning manual comes out of retirement, maybe this is the "data" he was referring to.......hmmmmmmm






you must just look at pictures and don't read anything Dave has stated that is they way they done things back in the 60s. he has said many times after testing and solving many vibration and drive train issues he found it not to be correct in his opinion. he now recommends setting of of the motor/tranny center line. nice try though. it must really make you think also take a look, the motor/tranny center line is on the same line as the drive shaft......




Tony if you notice that the drive line is in line
in that pic... same way I set up my chassis stuff,
then I dial in the pinion angle on the drive shaft
just like the pic, which gives the front and rear
U-joints just a bit of angle for lube purposes

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553087
12/17/09 11:05 PM
12/17/09 11:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline OP
I Win
Quicktree  Offline OP
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better , my old dusty 1985 dave morgan chassis tuning manual comes out of retirement, maybe this is the "data" he was referring to.......hmmmmmmm






you must just look at pictures and don't read anything Dave has stated that is they way they done things back in the 60s. he has said many times after testing and solving many vibration and drive train issues he found it not to be correct in his opinion. he now recommends setting of of the motor/tranny center line. nice try though. it must really make you think also take a look, the motor/tranny center line is on the same line as the drive shaft......




Tony if you notice that the drive line is in line
in that pic... same way I set up my chassis stuff,
then I dial in the pinion angle on the drive shaft
just like the pic, which gives the front and rear
U-joints just a bit of angle for lube purposes





with that pic it further proves my point. you could pull that shaft out and still set your angle

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Quicktree] #553088
12/17/09 11:18 PM
12/17/09 11:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
All that I'm saying (and always have) is there may be
more ways to get to the end of the road.... yes it
COULD mean the trans and ALSO mean the drive shaft
6 of 1 and 1/2 dozen of the other..... same end point
but from a different exit. You might notice that when
people ask about this, I give BOTH choices, not what
I think might be correct

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553089
12/17/09 11:19 PM
12/17/09 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Q
Quicktree Offline OP
I Win
Quicktree  Offline OP
I Win
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quote:

All that I'm saying (and always have) is there may be
more ways to get to the end of the road.... yes it
COULD mean the trans and ALSO mean the drive shaft
6 of 1 and 1/2 dozen of the other..... same end point
but from a different exit. You might notice that when
people ask about this, I give BOTH choices, not what
I think might be correct





you do that to cover your butt

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: sixpackgut] #553090
12/17/09 11:53 PM
12/17/09 11:53 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,445
Sterling Heights, Michigan 483...
daniel_depetro Offline
pro stock
daniel_depetro  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,445
Sterling Heights, Michigan 483...
Quote:

http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/7571/

back for the holidays



That is the best thing I have ever watched that someone made, period!


1969 Dodge Super Bee A12 (440 Six Pack, 4-speed, Dana 60 4.10)

1972 Plymouth Road Runner (400, 4-speed, 8.75" 3.23)

1974 Plymouth Duster 360 (360, 4-speed, 8.75" 3.23)
Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Quicktree] #553091
12/18/09 12:14 AM
12/18/09 12:14 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Quote:

Quote:

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better , my old dusty 1985 dave morgan chassis tuning manual comes out of retirement, maybe this is the "data" he was referring to.......hmmmmmmm






you must just look at pictures and don't read anything Dave has stated that is they way they done things back in the 60s. he has said many times after testing and solving many vibration and drive train issues he found it not to be correct in his opinion. he now recommends setting of of the motor/tranny center line. nice try though. it must really make you think also take a look, the motor/tranny center line is on the same line as the drive shaft......




Wow!!, How did I miss this thread

All of Dave Morgans pics Shows a desired "Parallel driveline angle."

In the pics it shows that the tranny centerline and pinion centerline are on the Same plane.

In That case 'YES: you can set your Pinion angle Off the Driveshaft Alone for a optimized U jount function.

For the most part in the real world thats not the case. In the Real world if you set Pinion angle off the driveshaft Alone, Its a Crapshoot.

You Have No Idea what your True Pinion Angle is!


Now,Does That really Matter Ahhhh?? Yeah It could Be! Universal jounts are Forgiving.

But heres the Best Point I can Make!!

Universal Jounts Function Best with the Least amount of Friction and also occilation at a Parallel angle.

If your measuring Pinion angle off the Driveshaft alone, your measuring it Blindly.

I think its Time That Once and for all We ALL understand

HOW Universal Jounts Work!!

There is Vidieo on this. They Want a parallel plane. Pure and Simple.

Even Dave Morgan Agrees

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Blown71X] #553092
12/18/09 12:16 AM
12/18/09 12:16 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
Quote:

My head hurts....anybody have any asprin




anyone got a link to the last PA love fest? I forget who does it which way.

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: Quicktree] #553093
12/18/09 12:36 AM
12/18/09 12:36 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Just when you thought it couldn't get any better , my old dusty 1985 dave morgan chassis tuning manual comes out of retirement, maybe this is the "data" he was referring to.......hmmmmmmm






you must just look at pictures and don't read anything Dave has stated that is they way they done things back in the 60s. he has said many times after testing and solving many vibration and drive train issues he found it not to be correct in his opinion. he now recommends setting of of the motor/tranny center line. nice try though. it must really make you think also take a look, the motor/tranny center line is on the same line as the drive shaft......




Tony if you notice that the drive line is in line
in that pic... same way I set up my chassis stuff,
then I dial in the pinion angle on the drive shaft
just like the pic, which gives the front and rear
U-joints just a bit of angle for lube purposes





with that pic it further proves my point. you could pull that shaft out and still set your angle




Actually Tony if you look at the pic, that one is
set up INCORRECTLY... if you notice that the front
joint is in line BUT the rear still has the pinion
angle on it... you want BOTH joints to be in line
while under load... in the case of the pic, as the
pinion rotates up it will pull the rear into line
but the shaft will move upward moving the front joint
off of the same line.... when I set up my chassis/engine
I use a laser that I made up to fit in the rear main
of the engine and set the engine and pinion all in
line.... then rotate the pinion down which will give
BOTH joints movement for lube while not under full load

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553094
12/18/09 01:02 AM
12/18/09 01:02 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
Quote:

you want BOTH joints to be in line
while under load...

.... then rotate the pinion down which will give
BOTH joints movement for lube while not under full load




if you have everything inline with no misalignment the ujoints do not move, just spin with the crank/driveshaft/pinion leaving the needle bearings stationary. That creates point contact between the roller and shaft causing flat spots under load. For the needle bearings to roll you need working angles and the front and rear should cancel each other out to maintain constant velocity. IMO you want a small equal but opposite working angle under load to work the ujoints. when the working angles are to far off is when you have driveline vibrations due to the different velocities in the ujoints. flame away.

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: TS3303] #553095
12/18/09 01:13 AM
12/18/09 01:13 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Quote:

you want BOTH joints to be in line
while under load...

.... then rotate the pinion down which will give
BOTH joints movement for lube while not under full load




if you have everything inline with no misalignment the ujoints do not move, just spin with the crank/driveshaft/pinion leaving the needle bearings stationary. That creates point contact between the roller and shaft causing flat spots under load. For the needle bearings to roll you need working angles and the front and rear should cancel each other out to maintain constant velocity. IMO you want a small equal but opposite working angle under load to work the ujoints. when the working angles are to far off is when you have driveline vibrations due to the different velocities in the ujoints. flame away.




No I'm not gonna flame away but I really dont think
you (at least me) get it 100% in line but I try to,
and I still have the same joints in it since I built
the car(both times) without any sign of wear or
flatting.... but then again I dont make much power

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553096
12/18/09 01:28 AM
12/18/09 01:28 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
it may see that perfectly inline scenario somewhere during launch/acceleration but with the dynamics of the rear suspension it's not staying there for long. so what does that mean in the big picture? My guess and I have talked to Monte in PM's during the last PA love fest and he agreed (I think? don't mean to put words in his mouth) that as long as we're close that's good enough. IMO as long as we keep the working angles within a degree of each other we are good to go.

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553097
12/18/09 01:29 AM
12/18/09 01:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
There is always Dynamic movement in the joint, dont worry about the needle bearings NOT rolling.

They will, Try to Stop it from happening mike

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: TS3303] #553098
12/18/09 01:40 AM
12/18/09 01:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

it may see that perfectly inline scenario somewhere during launch/acceleration but with the dynamics of the rear suspension it's not staying there for long. so what does that mean in the big picture? My guess and I have talked to Monte in PM's during the last PA love fest and he agreed (I think? don't mean to put words in his mouth) that as long as we're close that's good enough. IMO as long as we keep the working angles within a degree of each other we are good to go.




I would have to agree .... the launch sees the
greatest load so thats when I HOPE its in line but
as torque replenishes it isnt in line any longer

Re: Dave Morgan chassis seminar a success [Re: MR_P_BODY] #553099
12/18/09 01:45 AM
12/18/09 01:45 AM
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
TS3303 Offline
top fuel
TS3303  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,981
SE Michigan
I actually asked Monte if he had ever mapped the pinion angle during a full run. His reply was basically why if your not having problems.

maybe Tony can have Dave have racepak hook him up with the proper sensors to install on different suspension/power cars to see what it really does.

Page 6 of 11 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 10 11






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1