Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Dual Plane vs Single Plane --Sorry Long Post #532735
11/21/09 04:17 PM
11/21/09 04:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
R
red70duster Offline OP
member
red70duster  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
Kinda slow today been doing some thinking. I run a 410 stroker small block. It has edlebrock heads that other than valve springs, retainers and milling to 59cc's hasn't been touched. I have been running a M-1 that has some port work. I run a solid cam in the .555 lift 296 dur area with a lobe cent of 108. I have been shifting at 6600 and tach at 6900 in the quarter. I have been worried about the cast crank at these rpms and since the engine peaked at 525hp @ 6200rpm on the dyno maybe I'm twisting her too tight. I have a dual plane that is supposed to be good to 6500 rpm and I doubt the heads flow much more over than anyhow. Would I be ahead shifting at 6200 and running the dual plane and my 4.10 gears back in? I am running 4.56's now with 29.5 mickeys. Car runs good now I'm just concerned about the Eagle cast crank.

Thanks
Gary

Re: Dual Plane vs Single Plane --Sorry Long Post [Re: red70duster] #532736
11/21/09 04:52 PM
11/21/09 04:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
T
Triple Threat Offline
master
Triple Threat  Offline
master
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
Only way to know for sure is to try it, I don't think the dual plane will make more power than the M1. 4" stroke small blocks need more plenum size then your typical 340 or 360. You could always short shift the car, it might slow a little, but would help with longevity. I'd say leave the motor alone, try the 4.10's if you're worried about the crank at current rpm's.


-Dustin
67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi
68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
Re: Dual Plane vs Single Plane --Sorry Long Post [Re: Triple Threat] #532737
11/21/09 10:39 PM
11/21/09 10:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 972
alabama
M
mopars rule Offline
mopar addict
mopars rule  Offline
mopar addict
M

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 972
alabama
Before I changed anything I would start shifting at 6000 rpm and go from there. If the car will run about the same times at a lower rpm I would leave it there. If you are bracket racing I would leave it at the lower rpm anyway just to help the engine survive longer.

Re: Dual Plane vs Single Plane --Sorry Long Post [Re: red70duster] #532738
11/21/09 11:34 PM
11/21/09 11:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,213
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,213
Bend,OR USA
Move the shift points up on each gear change to lower the top end RPM at the finish line Try 6900 RPM instaed of 6600 RPM


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Dual Plane vs Single Plane --Sorry Long Post [Re: red70duster] #532739
11/21/09 11:53 PM
11/21/09 11:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
You wasting the motor away turning that many RPM.

Try the 4.10s first and shift mabey 6500 max and you will probably pick up everywhere except mabey 60ft, if you want that back try the dual plane and a 1 inch spacer. All that should help the motor last longer also.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!









Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1