Post deleted by Defbob
[Re: cheapstreetdustr]
#493863
10/11/09 12:53 PM
10/11/09 12:53 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
[Re: emarine01]
#493865
10/11/09 01:30 PM
10/11/09 01:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918 Akron, Ohio
ProSport
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,918
Akron, Ohio
|
I think 2 carbs would be better but if the rules require one carb there's alot of guys using a ram with one carb, 340Rick and Bobsprofab have cars that fly with the single carb/ram combo.
1970 Challenger, all aluminum 528 Hemi, HDK suspension, Tremec 5 speed manual
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
[Re: Bakaruda432]
#493870
10/11/09 03:25 PM
10/11/09 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,596 BX, CT, FL.
B1KILLER
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,596
BX, CT, FL.
|
Quote:
Never seen a mud drag race but it sounds awesome like a tractor pull w/out the weighted sled.
Saw a mud drag evnt last night on ESPN, was pretty cool. I think it was a Jeep Cherokee dat won the event.
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
[Re: B1KILLER]
#493871
10/11/09 09:47 PM
10/11/09 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257 acworth / N. georgia - south e...
cheapstreetdustr
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,257
acworth / N. georgia - south e...
|
if you center the 2bbl doms..over the front and rear plenum.. i think that will work. that w-5 T/R has alot of plenum volume that i think a singel center'd would short change cyl 1-2 ,7-8. best of luck let us know which way you go .. and how you/it go's.. cheapst.
365" Iron J heads,,3480lbs best 1.39 60ft on SS springs.10.54,124 mph ...6.67 1/8th et.average 60fts 1.46 w/ small cam &.063 no2 pill tagged & insured [image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
[Re: emarine01]
#493872
10/11/09 11:56 PM
10/11/09 11:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699 Newport, Mi
Evil Spirit
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,699
Newport, Mi
|
Quote:
The rules we go by are single 4bbl or split dom no 2 - 4bbls, I was thinking there may be a torque advantage in the upper Rpm range with the tunnel ram , I all ready have it and its port matched to my W5s, was even thinking of a set of 500cfm 2bbl carbs, the w5s we run have the tops of the ports raised real high so with the tunnel ram its just about a straight down path to the intake valve, I have never ran a tunnel ram so dont have much info about them but from just lookin at it seems to me the air fuel has a long easy path to the valve
On one of the other posts we were discussing over tea and crumpets the actual cfm of the 6BBl 500 cfm carbs (or the #4412 universal 500's). The 2BBL's were reportedly (by Holley) to be flowed at a higher vac setting, and the cfm ratings do not directly compare to a 4BBL. I can't see how the 2 - 2BBL "500's" can flow 1000cfm with the same size venturi and throttle plates as a single 735cfm. I think if split Dom's are allowed, they would be the way to go if you want to use that style induction.
Free advice and worth every penny... Factory trained Slinky rewinder.........
|
|
|
Post deleted by Defbob
[Re: Evil Spirit]
#493873
10/12/09 09:17 AM
10/12/09 09:17 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
#493874
10/12/09 09:30 AM
10/12/09 09:30 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325 Truckville, the capital of NY
85_Ram_4speed
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325
Truckville, the capital of NY
|
Yup, the 500cfm 2bbls, flow roughly about 375 cfm in comparison to a 4 bbl carb---so the pair is about equal to a 750 4bbl carb.
If your rpm is range is that high,, it seems to me the split dom's would work best.
I tried Daves idea of setting them sideways---did it on a two bbl motor i was messing with--only a single carb manifold however. I didn't see any improvement, but in theory it sounded good. I bet only a dyno could tell if them being sidways would make a difference or not. I think if you do it, just centering them over the runners will do just fine.
Outcast Dodge guy.
|
|
|
Re: Single Tunnel Ram vs M1
[Re: 85_Ram_4speed]
#493875
10/12/09 12:27 PM
10/12/09 12:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695 nc
emarine01
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,695
nc
|
Thankx for the feed back, the split dom combo may have some potential, or fabing a single top may work, it seems that a single top will have to be raised higher up to straighten out the flow to the outside cyls, the combo we run now is a small port M1 W5 intake that has been modified by welding around 1/4" of alu around the top and side of the runners and hogging out a ton of material to match the ports, some one spent a ton of time on this one , the top flange looks like a dom pattern but with a 4150 layout< have to make carb gaskets form a dom pattern> then they spent the time to polish it all the way thru the runners, I run 2" open spacer on it to 1000cfm carb, as is the engine turns up super fast to 7k from around a 5300 hit on the vert , we keep short shifting and it seems the lower we shift the faster we run, we keep bumping up on tire size from 38.5x15 to 39x18 and the engine seems to handle the load, the tunnel ram would be a easy change if the benefits would prove worth it, one thing about my W5s is they didn't flow real big #s max but the low lift thru mid were real good and I think the long tunnel ram port will help torque, the tunnel ram has the same welding work on the runners but was not polished, it looks like the tunnel ram was never finished or used, I am trying to get a feel on how the tunnel ram config will effect torque curve, Big HP#s is not what I realy want its a longer torque curve
|
|
|
|
|