|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: ademon]
#386005
07/28/09 12:47 PM
07/28/09 12:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
AdamR
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
|
What spots would the KV stamped hose have been used on orginally ? Also, what are the correct clamps for the 3 port breather and the brake booster ?
Another thing I have been wondering about.
Exhaust manifolds, Since they were bolted to the motor prior to painting, Wouldnt they be pretty much entirely covered with paint instead of the slightly over sprayed look most people believe is correct ?
I know If I were painting them at the factory I wouldnt bother trying to keep the paint off of them. I would just cover them completely.
Last edited by AdamR; 07/28/09 04:03 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: bremotorsports]
#386007
07/28/09 06:54 PM
07/28/09 06:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
Ont, Canada
moparo
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
Ont, Canada
|
There are many pictures on Legendary motorcar web site under inventory.
performancecarrestorations.com
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#386008
07/28/09 07:36 PM
07/28/09 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
Ont, Canada
moparo
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,101
Ont, Canada
|
moparo,
Don't get me wrong, not picking on your car/engine, it looks fantastic. However that looks like blue paint overspray on the upper rad hose, back of the alternator, assosiated wiring harness, and throttle return spring? If so that isn't original.
Scott.
I do not own that car. When did you see that car anyway?
performancecarrestorations.com
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: ScottSmith_Harms]
#386015
07/28/09 09:26 PM
07/28/09 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,763
Myrtle Beach, SC formerly the ...
340wedge
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,763
Myrtle Beach, SC formerly the ...
|
Thanks Scott  , Guess my question was confusing,,  but you answered it, my engine is blue and has the hump. From an earlier post I thought the picture of the hump stated it was cast in January and the one without in May, but must have been May of 1970, and the hump in January of 1971. Whew!... 
1971 Sassy Grass Green Duster 340
2006 Charger Daytona GoMango
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: moparo]
#386016
07/28/09 09:31 PM
07/28/09 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
FJ5_Fish
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,294
Ontario, Canada
|
Quote:
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. pictures 
Of the car - Not your wife again! 
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: AdamR]
#386018
07/29/09 06:14 PM
07/29/09 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
AdamR
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
|
Quote:
What spots would the KV stamped hose have been used on orginally ? Also, what are the correct clamps for the 3 port breather and the brake booster ?
Another thing I have been wondering about.
Exhaust manifolds, Since they were bolted to the motor prior to painting, Wouldnt they be pretty much entirely covered with paint instead of the slightly over sprayed look most people believe is correct ?
I know If I were painting them at the factory I wouldnt bother trying to keep the paint off of them. I would just cover them completely.
anyone ?
|
|
|
Re: Detailed stock 71 340 engine pics needed
[Re: chrisf]
#386021
07/30/09 06:44 AM
07/30/09 06:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
AdamR
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
|
Quote:
this is a 71 318 cover i have.
Thats what I used with a piece of KV hose for the vent line to the apron which I believe had a crimpped clamp on the oher end originally. What about the line to the carb ? Same clamps ?
|
|
|
|
|
