Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) #341658
06/08/09 08:41 PM
06/08/09 08:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
So my question is for you Cal Trak users what pinion and Trans angle did you end up with that is working and vibration free?

As some of you know my 68' road runner has been back out of retirement for a year now and I have A small vibration that I can't get rid of, here is where I am at.
The engine /trans is -3.5* (trans is pointing 3.5 down) I think my main vibration is coming from the front u-joint it comes in around 110 mph and lasts till the end of the run (10.5 @ 126mph), then gets quiet for a few seconds and then goes through a few seconds of vibes as it slows down (probably pretty much following the acceleration vibe but from 126 to 110) . The rear pinion is at 0* which I would think would put me in that 2-4* range that Calvert suggests.
I have always had my Cal Traks set up with about 1/2 turn of preload in them, someone at the track suggested that a lot of the stock eliminator guys are running about a 1/8" air gap (so no preload).
I tried that for a couple runs and my vibration got louder, I noticed when you go from nuetral to 1/2 turn of preload on the CT's it is rolling the pinion down 1/2 degree or so, so that tells me the vibration is going away with more negative angle on the pinion but when you do this it will put me way out of the 2-4 degree suggested angle and would be around 6* is my guess? I would shim the trans up but have no room to do so with the CSR trans shield as it is against the floor.
At times the rear sounds like it is climbing up in the car if that is possible but I don't think it is with the CT's? The dana 60 has no snubber to keep it off the floor as it was a truck rear with no tapped provision for it.
If it is due to the tranny being to down at 3.5* I might be able to lower the motor some but trying to avoid that.
I will also add that I have had my driveshaft balanced twice with no difference or improvement.
So any suggestions and where did your angles end up?

Keith

5280561-IMG_4483.JPG (113 downloads)
Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341659
06/08/09 09:03 PM
06/08/09 09:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,880
USA
Ron Silva Offline
top fuel
Ron Silva  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,880
USA


If your angles are good I would say replace the bushing in the rear of the trans and check the pinion. How much does the driveshat pull out of the trans? Also maybe try to let out of it when it is vibrating and see if it stops. That would tell you if it is rear pinion angle needing to rotate down.

Last edited by dragrcr97; 06/08/09 09:09 PM.

SRT DEMON ONE SEAT
Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Ron Silva] #341660
06/08/09 10:04 PM
06/08/09 10:04 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 794
SC
Greg Offline
super stock
Greg  Offline
super stock

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 794
SC
You might want to check the length of your driveshaft and has it ever been balanced. I would say it has to do with the clearance of the driveshaft in the trans tailhousing. When you change the preload it will change how much the driveshaft is in the tailhousing. If you know of a good chassis shop it may be good to get the car scaled with you in it to get the appropriate amount of preload and check the driveshaft length and maybe make sure it is in balance.

Every car is a little different so what works for an a body may not be the same with a B body. I always had good luck with the bars barely touching in my roadrunner. I was running an 8' converter and it was setup to flash between 5200-5,400 in my 499.

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Ron Silva] #341661
06/08/09 10:26 PM
06/08/09 10:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:



If your angles are good I would say replace the bushing in the rear of the trans and check the pinion. How much does the driveshat pull out of the trans? Also maybe try to let out of it when it is vibrating and see if it stops. That would tell you if it is rear pinion angle needing to rotate down.




I have been thinking of checking out the rear bushing and thought I would see if anyone suggested that.
To add to my initial post I would say that the acceleration noise is from the front u-joint or tail shaft and the initial deceleration noise is from the rear u-joint, and I believe I read some were when noise comes upon acceleration roll the pinion down a few degrees and when It comes on decel to roll the pinion up? I have tried rolling it up and down a little and the noises stay consistent so very well could be the rear bushing or maybe needs rear roller support for what (speed) the car is going?


Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Greg] #341662
06/08/09 10:28 PM
06/08/09 10:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:

You might want to check the length of your driveshaft and has it ever been balanced. I would say it has to do with the clearance of the driveshaft in the trans tailhousing. When you change the preload it will change how much the driveshaft is in the tailhousing. If you know of a good chassis shop it may be good to get the car scaled with you in it to get the appropriate amount of preload and check the driveshaft length and maybe make sure it is in balance.

Every car is a little different so what works for an a body may not be the same with a B body. I always had good luck with the bars barely touching in my roadrunner. I was running an 8' converter and it was setup to flash between 5200-5,400 in my 499.





Yes , The driveshaft has been balanced twice so I am confident that is not the problem.
The drive shaft is slid out 1" after bottomed out in the tranny.

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Greg] #341663
06/08/09 10:34 PM
06/08/09 10:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
M
moparniac Offline
master
moparniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
put a 2* shim out back....... whats your 60's BTW....

I went 10.6 @ 128.3 1.55 60 ft 1st time out with the caltracs.... -2 i believe on the tranny and -2 on the diff now.... no vibrations 3800lb car

2 flats preload on dr side and 1 flat preload on pass side... I have a dana 60 and no subber also


Mopar Performance
Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: moparniac] #341664
06/08/09 10:48 PM
06/08/09 10:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
C
caper Offline
mopar
caper  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 525
Can , Nova Scotia , Cape Breto...
Lets say your trans angle is 0* , than to get a -3* pinion angle you would rotate the rearend down -3*.

You say your trans angle is -3.5 , than you would have to rotate the rearend down -6.5* to get a -3*.
Recheck your trans angle off your your crank pully.


New best 10.18 , 1.40 60 ft 496 Scott Brown built, street driven 3600 lbs,654 hp , 653 ft tq
Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: caper] #341665
06/08/09 10:55 PM
06/08/09 10:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 501
Port Mcneill,B.C.Canada
I
Islandcuda Offline
mopar
Islandcuda  Offline
mopar
I

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 501
Port Mcneill,B.C.Canada
You say your sheild is already hitting the floor, could that be the vibration spot?


67 cuda new best 1.395 60 10.240 at 128.58mph
Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: moparniac] #341666
06/08/09 11:01 PM
06/08/09 11:01 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:

put a 2* shim out back....... whats your 60's BTW....

I went 10.6 @ 128.3 1.55 60 ft 1st time out with the caltracs.... -2 i believe on the tranny and -2 on the diff now.... no vibrations 3800lb car

2 flats preload on dr side and 1 flat preload on pass side... I have a dana 60 and no subber also




60's are 1.520 to 1.54 depending on track conditions, 4.10 gear, 30x9 Hoosier drag radial

Car is usually in the low 10.50's @ 127 if no wind and has touched 10.47 - 48 a few times.
This is a 500" pump gas motor with full exhaust out the back.

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341667
06/08/09 11:01 PM
06/08/09 11:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 660
San Diego
formula S Offline
mopar
formula S  Offline
mopar

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 660
San Diego
Check out this link it might help you out http://www.markwilliams.com/driveshafttech.aspx

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: caper] #341668
06/08/09 11:04 PM
06/08/09 11:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:

Lets say your trans angle is 0* , than to get a -3* pinion angle you would rotate the rearend down -3*.

You say your trans angle is -3.5 , than you would have to rotate the rearend down -6.5* to get a -3*.
Recheck your trans angle off your your crank pully.




Calvert wants -2 to -4 total (tranny and rear combined) So to me tranny at -3.5* and rear at 0* is a total -3.5 ?

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Islandcuda] #341669
06/08/09 11:08 PM
06/08/09 11:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:

You say your sheild is already hitting the floor, could that be the vibration spot?




I have had that thought as well, hope that is it as I probably have close to 100 runs playing with this thing, trying to figure it out and so far it hasn't gone BOOM and the u-joint all feel tight and rollers look good. Maybe I should try and lower the tranny another .5 degree and give it some clearance.

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341670
06/08/09 11:35 PM
06/08/09 11:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
On the drive shaft I've always used 3/4" max for the
amount of movement back from bottom... the farther you
go rearward the more movement it will have... specially
if you have a worn tail shaft bushing

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: formula S] #341671
06/09/09 01:18 AM
06/09/09 01:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
K
Keith Richards Offline OP
master
Keith Richards  Offline OP
master
K

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,946
Windsor ,Ca.
Quote:

Check out this link it might help you out http://www.markwilliams.com/driveshafttech.aspx




Ok, just got back in from the garage with digital level in hand and here is where the car is at now:

trans/ engine -3.5* (I always measure from balancer)- drive shaft arrow down 0.5* arrow up (driveshaft is .5* down from meeting pinion) - rear is 0.5* pinion down. So to me that is a total of -4* combined trans and rear as Calvert recommends 2 - 4* for Mopars with there products.

That is with a 1/2 turn of preload, If I went to nuetral the rear would be at 0* .

Sound right? Now looking at Mark Williams sight above they are saying I need to roll the pinion up to +3

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341672
06/09/09 12:50 PM
06/09/09 12:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,930
Odessa, Tx.
cudarex Offline
master
cudarex  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,930
Odessa, Tx.
This explains it good:
http://www.rosslertrans.com/Pinion%20Angle.htm
Your looking for the angle of the tranny shaft and the rear pinion to be near zero upon hard launch. Since the tranny is stationary then the rear pinion will have to do all the work. If tranny is at -3.5 then the rear would be at 0 degrees resting assuming the rear rotates up 3.5 degrees on exceleration that would give you 0 degrees alignment with the tranny.

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341673
06/13/09 03:18 PM
06/13/09 03:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,200
UK
6
602heavy Offline
pro stock
602heavy  Offline
pro stock
6

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,200
UK
On the 68 charger the trans is pointing dowm 3.5* & the dana up 3.5* with no issues (o*?) , i've heard many times this is wrong & the dana should be pointing down 3.5* , this has always baffled me as then you would have a difference of 7*.

I also use Caltracs.

Am i thinking right on this?

Re: Time for another Cal Trak Thread? (Long) [Re: Keith Richards] #341674
06/13/09 05:10 PM
06/13/09 05:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 718
Vallejo California
T
T748 Offline
super street
T748  Offline
super street
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 718
Vallejo California
You might want to check your spring pads if you havn't lately. The Cal Tracs crushed my stock style pads from flat to semi-circles in a season. Between that and trying the air gap trick it took out a bit too much pinion angle. With a set of re-enforced spring pads from these guys- http://www.ruffstuffspecialties.com/catalog/d60-88-9-spring-perch-p-253.html
4 degrees of pinion angle, I'm not feeling any drive line funkyness. Also went back to half a turn preload on the passenger side and just touching on the drivers. -Tom.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1