Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Brad_Haak] #3207461
01/23/24 11:32 AM
01/23/24 11:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
522 bottom end (10.6-1), XTQ294 cam, TF240's, QF1050AN (4150). PTC 9.5, 3.91's. 3900lb B-body. Current Holley SD

Last edited by Jeff_383; 01/23/24 11:33 AM.
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3207469
01/23/24 11:43 AM
01/23/24 11:43 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
I’d say the basic combo would pick up power with the 337.
How much of a gain there would be……..only one way to know for sure.

And…….the port mismatch is probably not going to help matters.
But, it may not be the kiss of death either.
Again, you’d have to try it to know.

I’ve tested BBC rectangle port manifolds on oval port heads(which is a huge mismatch) that picked up power over their oval port counterparts.

If the manifold is priced friendly enough, just try it.
If it doesn’t do what you want……. Flip it.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: fast68plymouth] #3207473
01/23/24 11:51 AM
01/23/24 11:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
The price seems decent. I'll get it. This is the one we're talking about I hope.

337.jpg
Last edited by Jeff_383; 01/23/24 11:57 AM.
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3207479
01/23/24 12:15 PM
01/23/24 12:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
I haven’t had one in my shop in several years, but that looks right.

The stage 6 intakes are the same design, but are for raised port heads and are taller.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3207500
01/23/24 01:12 PM
01/23/24 01:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,074
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,074
Benton, IL.
If that intake doesn't work out for you, let me know. I would be interested in it for the 500" wedge sitting in the corner. Modern ported the Eddies years ago and I think that intake would be a good fit. I would at least like to find out. up


Master, again and still
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: DaveRS23] #3207545
01/23/24 02:49 PM
01/23/24 02:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Yes, perfect intake for a set of MW ported Edelbrock heads on an RB block. You get rid of the bathtub gasket that way and the carb should be low enough to fit under a flat hood.

Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: AndyF] #3207550
01/23/24 03:24 PM
01/23/24 03:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875
Weddington, N.C.
The 337 fits perfectly on my Stage VI Low Deck, but it has a slight 'Air gap' over the Indy Vally plate

IMG_5641.jpg

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: AndyF] #3208204
01/26/24 12:37 AM
01/26/24 12:37 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,504
DFW
M
mr_340 Offline
master
mr_340  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,504
DFW
Originally Posted by AndyF
Originally Posted by Brad_Haak
I don't think people realized the 337 was any good until about the same time MP decided to quit making them. I don't know what they sold for new "way back when", but popular used BB Mopar intakes seem to be bringing good money these days.


That was back when Zippy was still working at MP. They killed the 337 and then he talked them into bringing it back. I did some dyno tests with it for a magazine article and made really good power. They sold a few more after that and then killed it again. They really just didn't want to sell parts like that anymore no matter how good they were.


I think Mopar Performance did a lousy job of marketing the 337 intake. I looked at it for years wondering if it would fit a 440 with MW heads. I wasn't willing to buy one to find out if that was the case. Andy finally bought one and published the results. I snagged one before they disappeared completely. Thanks to Andy for buying one and letting everyone know what it was.


Floyd Lippencott IV
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3208213
01/26/24 04:41 AM
01/26/24 04:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,176
Md.
C
carnut68 Offline
master
carnut68  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3,176
Md.
I was swapping parts with a guy in Pa and he had 3 of them on a shelf along with about a dozen other BB mopar intakes.


America First!
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: carnut68] #3208258
01/26/24 11:10 AM
01/26/24 11:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Buy 'em up

Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3209880
02/01/24 09:20 PM
02/01/24 09:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Well it showed up today, in it's original box. I'll try it out as soon as I can.

20240201_194924.jpg
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3209889
02/01/24 09:45 PM
02/01/24 09:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Looks good. Be interesting to see how it fits and works for you. I had great luck with the one on my old 514. It worked much better than expected.

Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: AndyF] #3209957
02/02/24 09:24 AM
02/02/24 09:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB Offline
master
HardcoreB  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
Like has been suggested...take a hand file, use some tape, and a vacuum 'trunk monkey' and artfully remove any down-stream interference and it'll pick the combo up for certain. Make you efforts/expense worthwhile. If it makes you feel any better you should know at Roush we'd occasionally tickle NASCAR intake manifolds ON THE DYNO to help fuel distribution. And he'd use no vacuum but blast it with shop air for clean-up. If you knew the man, you'd know he'd sell his soul for a good running engine, at that time anyway.

Last edited by HardcoreB; 02/02/24 09:29 AM.
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: AndyF] #3210147
02/02/24 09:53 PM
02/02/24 09:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Comparing the ports, the are extremely close to the TF240's.

Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3210239
02/03/24 12:14 PM
02/03/24 12:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,126
Loudoun County, VA
Brad_Haak Offline
super stock
Brad_Haak  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,126
Loudoun County, VA
That's encouraging, at least as a starting point.

I bought a cheap(?) Harbor Freight bore scope for checking port alignment between intake and heads when installing 'em cuz you can't really see the full interface without sticking a scope way down the intake runner. scope


2021 Challenger 6.4L Scat Pack 1320
100% stock: 1.680, 11.894 at 113.75 (DA 175 ft)
weight reduction, wheels, tires, Hellcat air box: 1.661, 11.686 at 115.97 (DA 710 ft)

1973 Challenger 452 ci street/strip [2008]
pump gas, DOT radials: 1.454, 10.523 at 126.44 (DA 514 ft)
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Brad_Haak] #3210556
02/04/24 04:58 PM
02/04/24 04:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
Azzkikrcuda Offline
top fuel
Azzkikrcuda  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,807
North Dakota
My old 337 Intake thread might have some helpful info.
https://board.moparts.org/ubbthread...mopar-337-intake-info-and-pics-here.html


The only Carbs I care about are under the hood!
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Azzkikrcuda] #3210607
02/04/24 07:07 PM
02/04/24 07:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
How does yours go with the 337 on it?


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: fast68plymouth] #3213246
02/13/24 03:53 PM
02/13/24 03:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Well, it's on. Matched up pretty good, as good as it can be. Just cleaned gaskets up some. We'll see when I get it out.

20240213_145024.jpg
Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3213249
02/13/24 04:03 PM
02/13/24 04:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,023
Oregon
Looks great.

Re: Mopar 337 intake port question [Re: Jeff_383] #3213254
02/13/24 04:18 PM
02/13/24 04:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,496
So. Burlington, Vt.
Can’t wait to hear the driving impressions and track results. up


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1