MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
#3167912
08/14/23 05:45 PM
08/14/23 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
OP
Mr. Helpful
|
OP
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621
Fulton County, PA
|
...and why?
Drag race stuff
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
[Re: CMcAllister]
#3167919
08/14/23 06:30 PM
08/14/23 06:30 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715 Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
|
Not even a contest, pick the 89981, it can do everything the 8998 can do plus coil on plug, crank trigger wheels and adjust the dwell on individual coils. The only disadvantage is it is not reparable.
Last edited by sr4440; 08/14/23 06:30 PM.
Without Data, you’re just another guy with an opinion.
|
|
|
Re: MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
[Re: CMcAllister]
#3168025
08/15/23 08:34 AM
08/15/23 08:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,375 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,375
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
FWIW...I had a misfire issue w/ a digital 6al-2 programmable box that tested fine w/ the 8998 tester.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
[Re: sr4440]
#3168056
08/15/23 11:33 AM
08/15/23 11:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
OP
Mr. Helpful
|
OP
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621
Fulton County, PA
|
Not even a contest, pick the 89981, it can do everything the 8998 can do plus coil on plug, crank trigger wheels and adjust the dwell on individual coils. The only disadvantage is it is not reparable. That's what I was thinking, But the fact that the 8998 is almost double the price had me wondering what I was missing. The ability to test and verify rev limiters, shifters and shift lights, nitrous solenoids, and anything else using RPM, along with the functions of the box, coil, wiring, etc., without having to run the engine in a race car, put laps on it, or throw parts at it, is where the value of these show up.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
[Re: CMcAllister]
#3168062
08/15/23 11:59 AM
08/15/23 11:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,376 Las Vegas
Al_Alguire
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,376
Las Vegas
|
89981 for the reasons given as well as it works with the Grid which the older 8998 does not. It also allows you to simulate runs etc to ensure RPM functions work.
"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."
"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
|
|
|
Re: MSD 8998 or 89981 tester?
[Re: Al_Alguire]
#3168097
08/15/23 02:18 PM
08/15/23 02:18 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
OP
Mr. Helpful
|
OP
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,621
Fulton County, PA
|
89981 for the reasons given as well as it works with the Grid which the older 8998 does not. It also allows you to simulate runs etc to ensure RPM functions work. Yes Sir, I saw that. Just thought I was missing something. Better is seldom cheaper.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
|
|