Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? #3147457
05/29/23 04:11 PM
05/29/23 04:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
All else being equal, would there be a change in 1/4 mile times going from 3.91 to 3.55?

3900lb b body, large cube stroker, same PTC 9.5 converter (built for car with 3.91's)

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147470
05/29/23 06:46 PM
05/29/23 06:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,176
Park Forest, IL
slantzilla Offline
Too Many Posts
slantzilla  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,176
Park Forest, IL
Just a guess, you may not lose much ET, maybe .05, but will probably pick up a little MPH.


"Everybody funny, now you funny too."
Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147471
05/29/23 06:52 PM
05/29/23 06:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,025
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,025
Oregon
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
All else being equal, would there be a change in 1/4 mile times going from 3.91 to 3.55?

3900lb b body, large cube stroker, same PTC 9.5 converter (built for car with 3.91's)


Can't really say without looking at the data log or some numbers. If the car is on the rev limiter going down the track then it might pick up time. If it is traction limited it might go quicker and faster with less gear. If the 3.91 gears are perfect for the engine and car then it will slow down.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: AndyF] #3147476
05/29/23 07:17 PM
05/29/23 07:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,764
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,764
A collage of whims
Taller gear should raise the converter's stall speed a bit.
Whether the car wants that is hard to tell from here with the info so far.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: AndyF] #3147477
05/29/23 07:19 PM
05/29/23 07:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
If the 3.91 gears are perfect for the engine and car then it will slow down.



I'm not really sure. The engine made 601 horsepower at 5500 and 633 torque at 4500

I know that's a vague answer, but I never really picked a gear to build on.

Last edited by Jeff_383; 05/29/23 07:36 PM.
Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147497
05/29/23 09:18 PM
05/29/23 09:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,350
Omaha Ne
T
TJP Offline
I Live Here
TJP  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,350
Omaha Ne
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
If the 3.91 gears are perfect for the engine and car then it will slow down.



I'm not really sure. The engine made 601 horsepower at 5500 and 633 torque at 4500

I know that's a vague answer, but I never really picked a gear to build on.


With that kind of torque, I doubt you'll see much difference shruggy twocents

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147502
05/29/23 10:19 PM
05/29/23 10:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,507
N.E. OHIO, USA
A12 Offline
Too Many Posts
A12  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,507
N.E. OHIO, USA
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
All else being equal, would there be a change in 1/4 mile times going from 3.91 to 3.55?

3900lb b body, large cube stroker, same PTC 9.5 converter (built for car with 3.91's)


What's the car running now with the 3.91?

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: A12] #3147511
05/29/23 11:42 PM
05/29/23 11:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
I haven't ran it with the new motor yet. Old motor went mid 11's with the 3.91's.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: topside] #3147792
05/31/23 11:59 AM
05/31/23 11:59 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,820
Connecticut
FurryStump Offline
master
FurryStump  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,820
Connecticut
Originally Posted by topside
Taller gear should raise the converter's stall speed a bit.
Whether the car wants that is hard to tell from here with the info so far.


Flash rpm yes, stall no. Rear gear has no effect on stall and it really only changes flash rpm because of how flash rpm is defined, not a “real” change to the actual flash rpm. The change is the car just moves easier/sooner. So yes the rpm will be lower when the car first moves, but you can still get to the power band quicker during the run. (The reason we play with flash in the first place)I went with a low gear set 904 which would “lower” my flash rpm, but because the car is moving, I would get to peak torque .5 second quicker in the run, even with the “reduced” flash rpm.


best of 11.39 at 117 mph 1.60 60’. 68 340 S Barracuda Fastback F.A.S.T [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/2mnnnnt.jpg[/IMG]
Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147834
05/31/23 01:58 PM
05/31/23 01:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
Nothing with that combo.

We run a 3.54 gear with a 505" stroker and rear ratio seems to matter very little with the torque it makes.

It's been 1.36 60 ft. with an 11" converter.


'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: GY3] #3147899
05/31/23 08:39 PM
05/31/23 08:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,161
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,161
Bend,OR USA
[quote=GY3]Nothing with that combo.

We run a 3.54 gear with a 505" stroker and rear ratio seems to matter very little with the torque it makes.: iagree I ran 4 different rear gear ratios in my old pump gas stroker motor in my Duster, 3:73, 3,91, 4.10 and 4.30 with no other changes, other than running at different tracks. It ran within.08 and 1.0 MPH as long as it didn't spin work shruggy
I did have a Mopar brand low gear drive set (2.77 I think) in the 727, best 60 ft was 1.42 I think confused shruggy


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Cab_Burge] #3147910
05/31/23 10:14 PM
05/31/23 10:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Well, I may look out for a 3.55 third member then. It does drive well with the 3.91's. Just want a little more on the freeway for some longer trips. I also really like the new PTC 9.5.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147917
05/31/23 10:56 PM
05/31/23 10:56 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,053
N.W. Florida
F
Fat_Mike Offline
master
Fat_Mike  Offline
master
F

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,053
N.W. Florida
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
Well, I may look out for a 3.55 third member then. It does drive well with the 3.91's. Just want a little more on the freeway for some longer trips. I also really like the new PTC 9.5.


If that's[/i] the goal (or the consideration), there are calculators that will tell you how much your RPM's will be affected. I think [i]the track will be the only way to truly figure out the affect at the track. shruggy

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147919
05/31/23 11:38 PM
05/31/23 11:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,025
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,025
Oregon
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
Well, I may look out for a 3.55 third member then. It does drive well with the 3.91's. Just want a little more on the freeway for some longer trips. I also really like the new PTC 9.5.


If you want a higher gear for the freeway then go with the 3.55 gears. Sounds like the car is more of a driver than an all out drag car so make it work for what you want it to do. It isn't going to slow down much at the track. In fact, if it is traction limited then it might actually leave the line better with the taller gear.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147945
06/01/23 09:01 AM
06/01/23 09:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,074
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,074
Benton, IL.


Master, again and still
Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: Jeff_383] #3147966
06/01/23 11:17 AM
06/01/23 11:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
Originally Posted by Jeff_383
Well, I may look out for a 3.55 third member then. It does drive well with the 3.91's. Just want a little more on the freeway for some longer trips. I also really like the new PTC 9.5.


You say "third member".

If you're planning on hooking this combo at the track with slicks, you're going to need to upgrade to something stouter than an 8 3/4.


'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: GY3] #3148019
06/01/23 04:06 PM
06/01/23 04:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
TheOtherDodge Offline
master
TheOtherDodge  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by GY3
Nothing with that combo.

We run a 3.54 gear with a 505" stroker and rear ratio seems to matter very little with the torque it makes.

It's been 1.36 60 ft. with an 11" converter.


That is a little deceiving. shruggy Unless you are saying you went 1.36 N/A.

On my 389 small block, I run a 3.55 gear and have gone 1.37 60ft.... but... there is more to that statement...

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: TheOtherDodge] #3148022
06/01/23 04:24 PM
06/01/23 04:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,672
Wichita
Originally Posted by TheOtherDodge
Originally Posted by GY3
Nothing with that combo.

We run a 3.54 gear with a 505" stroker and rear ratio seems to matter very little with the torque it makes.

It's been 1.36 60 ft. with an 11" converter.


That is a little deceiving. shruggy Unless you are saying you went 1.36 N/A.

On my 389 small block, I run a 3.55 gear and have gone 1.37 60ft.... but... there is more to that statement...


1.54 60 ft. N/A

There, how's that? grin


'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: GY3] #3148139
06/02/23 09:55 AM
06/02/23 09:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
TheOtherDodge Offline
master
TheOtherDodge  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,953
Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by GY3
Originally Posted by TheOtherDodge
Originally Posted by GY3
Nothing with that combo.

We run a 3.54 gear with a 505" stroker and rear ratio seems to matter very little with the torque it makes.

It's been 1.36 60 ft. with an 11" converter.


That is a little deceiving. shruggy Unless you are saying you went 1.36 N/A.

On my 389 small block, I run a 3.55 gear and have gone 1.37 60ft.... but... there is more to that statement...


1.54 60 ft. N/A

There, how's that? grin


LOL, much more applicable! boogie

Re: 3.55 vs 3.91 track time differences? [Re: TheOtherDodge] #3148180
06/02/23 12:14 PM
06/02/23 12:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
J
Jeff_383 Offline OP
super stock
Jeff_383  Offline OP
super stock
J

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 877
Pittsburgh, Pa
Well, I did do a 1.58 60 with the old motor and 3.91's

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1