Calvert Racing shocks
#3134086
04/01/23 04:07 AM
04/01/23 04:07 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647 aotearoa
rebel
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
|
My rear shocks look like they need to retire, was looking on Summit & looking at Calvert adjustable shocks. It's for a stock bodied E body on SS springs. Are these any good or do I need to bite the bullet & buy fome Strange units?
Last edited by rebel; 04/01/23 04:12 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: rebel]
#3134087
04/01/23 04:22 AM
04/01/23 04:22 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,462 Sydney,Australia
tex013
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,462
Sydney,Australia
|
Maybe 🤔 Why not look at some Viking doubles ? I went from Rancho/Calvert to Viking running low 11s . Night and day
.
Tex
New best ET 10.259@129.65 . New best MPH 130.32 Finally fitted a solid cam, stepped it up a bit more 3690lbs through the mufflers New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm Power by Tex's Automotive
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: rebel]
#3134201
04/01/23 03:45 PM
04/01/23 03:45 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
My rear shocks look like they need to retire, was looking on Summit & looking at Calvert adjustable shocks. It's for a stock bodied E body on SS springs. Are these any good or do I need to bite the bullet & buy fome Strange units? How far are you going to go with this ? if you plan to eventually run 9's or better with it I'd go for good shocks right now (Santhuff, Menscers etc) . I ran Calverts to 10.0's but the Menscer / Afco's are far more consistent and also D/A. I think they would be better even on a 10 sec car. For info, the Santhuffs are easily better than the Menscers we used to run on the fronts.
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: Tig]
#3134324
04/02/23 03:52 AM
04/02/23 03:52 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647 aotearoa
rebel
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,647
aotearoa
|
How far are you going to go with this ? if you plan to eventually run 9's or better with it I'd go for good shocks right now (Santhuff, Menscers etc) . I ran Calverts to 10.0's but the Menscer / Afco's are far more consistent and also D/A. I think they would be better even on a 10 sec car. For info, the Santhuffs are easily better than the Menscers we used to run on the fronts.
The car has already run 10.5s with the current shocks, a 30 year old set of Comp Eng 3 ways, & I already have an 8 sec car. I'm just tryn to find a good quality replacement set. I run Strange coil overs on the 8 sec car & found them to be real good & have no problems buying another set. My problem is, I'm downunder so I gotta choose wisely, they're not going to be cheap by the time I get my hands on them. Do you have a link yo the ones you're talking snout?
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: rebel]
#3134338
04/02/23 06:52 AM
04/02/23 06:52 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
https://www.santhuffshocks.com/shocks.html. Pretty sure I have the 2160XL's on the front. https://www.menscermotorsports.com/ I Had these guys re-valve some Afco's, they can supply their own version if requested. They aint cheap and I feel your pain as I'm in the UK but If I had bought Santhuffs all round in the first place, I'd be into it just as much as buying different shocks has added up to. Shop around, I got my Santhuffs cheaper than they advertised by going through an approved dealer ( https://rinehartsperformance.com/ ) As with anything custom, any info or plans about the combo you can give them will be advantageous. Hope this helps
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: dvw]
#3134383
04/02/23 10:03 AM
04/02/23 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
Many racers run many different brands of shocks. Some cars run very well with the lower cost generic stuff. Some have the best available and aren't any better. Most racers don't seem to have a great working knowledge of shock and suspension adjustment. I know we've worked very hard on it. I still feel that we could learn more. Bottom line? If the valveing is in the useable range and you know where to set it? You're going to do pretty well. Currently we run Afco and Menscer on our two cars. Both require different tune-ups, One bias with ladder bars. One radial with Cal Trac. Doug We were running out of extension damping (jounce ?) with the comp engineering, then the Caltrac shocks, and the original Afco's rears were pretty the same. We sent them to Menscer for re-valving to run a Radial slick and Catracs explaining what was going on. They came back much better. We found the Menscer / Afco fronts didn't cope with the landings from big wheelies as good as the Santhuffs, the Santhuffs also responded better to fine adjustments too. Like yourself, I still think we are learning and will likely have to start again as we are changing the combo soon.
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: Tig]
#3134504
04/02/23 04:41 PM
04/02/23 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,157
Bend,OR USA
|
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 04/02/23 04:47 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: rebel]
#3134535
04/02/23 06:07 PM
04/02/23 06:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138 Melbourne , Australia
LA360
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,138
Melbourne , Australia
|
My rear shocks look like they need to retire, was looking on Summit & looking at Calvert adjustable shocks. It's for a stock bodied E body on SS springs. Are these any good or do I need to bite the bullet & buy fome Strange units? If you are just looking to replace the shocks you have, the Calvert/Rancho shocks will be ok. If you were looking to upgrade, a reputable brand double adjustable will be the way to go. AFCO, Strange, Koni, Viking etc.
Alan Jones
|
|
|
Re: Calvert Racing shocks
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#3134648
04/03/23 06:38 AM
04/03/23 06:38 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915 A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,915
A shed in England
|
I think Santthuff and Mencers skocks are high dollar custom made drag racing shocks for all out efforts Just for info but they do sell off the shelf shocks too, the Santhuffs we bought are "Long, Mopar fitment" replacements. True they are pricey but you will unlikely need another shock unless you were to go to a different design of suspension. They are also rebuildable, servicable and able to be modified. I went through buying, trying and the subsequent selling on of lots of different shocks, even the Afco "big guns" ran out of adjustment. I spent a lot of money before I spent a lot of money Personally, after experiencing the difference, I don't think you can have "too good" of a shock absorber. Again for info. Last pass 60ft was 1.41 on the back wheels, still tuning the combo for 3.73 gears and blowing through the converter. The 1.41 on the backs worked out as 1.34, as per the racepak (using "track time" and "G meter distance"). It has been as quick as 1.36 on the rears with 4.10's, which works out to a 1.28 60ft time, again according to the racepak. JMHO but I think that's remarkable for a 4000lb + vehicle N/A
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials. 9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge. RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
|
|