|
Re: 5.2 Magnum and 727
[Re: 360view]
#3115071
01/21/23 10:51 AM
01/21/23 10:51 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847 Oakdale CT
gdonovan
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,847
Oakdale CT
|
Studying the fuel economy difference between the 1992 Ram Magnum 5.2 V8 and the 1994 Ram Magnum V10 The V10 had some horrific real world MPG numbers if I recall.
"I think its got a hemi"
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 Magnum and 727
[Re: gdonovan]
#3115091
01/21/23 11:37 AM
01/21/23 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640 in a cattle trailer down by th...
Guitar Jones
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
|
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640
in a cattle trailer down by th...
|
Studying the fuel economy difference between the 1992 Ram Magnum 5.2 V8 and the 1994 Ram Magnum V10 The V10 had some horrific real world MPG numbers if I recall. My 2WD V10 dually with 4.10 gears got 9 MPG pretty much no matter what except with the 30' enclosed trailer behind it, then it got 6.
"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"
'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion. '74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon! 2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
|
|
|
Re: 5.2 Magnum and 727
[Re: Guitar Jones]
#3115096
01/21/23 11:58 AM
01/21/23 11:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 983 rust belt
Moparite
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 983
rust belt
|
The V10 had some horrific real world MPG numbers if I recall. You recalled correctly. I decided to with the 5.9 when i was in the market for a second gen. The V10 didn't offer MDS that's why it used so much fuel(it's 488 cubes!).
|
|
|
|
|
|