Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: Guitar Jones] #3086499
10/16/22 02:17 PM
10/16/22 02:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,497
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline OP
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline OP
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,497
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted by Guitar Jones
It's listed on their website and the first post.

up

89211-16


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: fast68plymouth] #3086553
10/16/22 03:52 PM
10/16/22 03:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,029
Oregon
A
AndyF Online content
I Win
AndyF  Online Content
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,029
Oregon
I'm using the Gaterman lifters with the Comp HR cam and I don't think the lifters are noisy. I guess I could shoot a video to see what others think. I think the lobes on my cam are fairly aggressive, it is the 13452B/13481B lobes.

Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: AndyF] #3086695
10/16/22 11:09 PM
10/16/22 11:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,996
s. e. pa.
C
calrobb2000 Offline
top fuel
calrobb2000  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,996
s. e. pa.

hi

how much pre load on the gatermans ?

i am looking at maybe replacing the noisy lifters on my hemi ?

do they have bushings or needle bearings ? .

cost ?

Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: calrobb2000] #3086884
10/17/22 03:26 PM
10/17/22 03:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: feets] #3086949
10/17/22 07:12 PM
10/17/22 07:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640
in a cattle trailer down by th...
G
Guitar Jones Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
Guitar Jones  Offline
Paddle faster! I hear banjo music!
G

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,640
in a cattle trailer down by th...
Unfortunately they don't make them for the small block.


"Follow me the wise man said, but he walked behind"


'92 D250 Club Cab CTD, 47RH conversion, pump tweaks, injectors, rear disc and hydroboost conversion.
'74 W200 Crew Cab 360, NV4500, D44, D60 and NP205 divorced transfer case. Rear disc and hydroboost coming soon!
2019 1500 Long Horn Crew Cab 4WD, 5.7 Hemi.
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: Guitar Jones] #3089279
10/26/22 08:30 AM
10/26/22 08:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
HardcoreB Offline
master
HardcoreB  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,048
Shelby Twp. Mi
Thanks for sharing this Dwayne! Maybe this will open the doorway to more better-performing dual-purpose motor combos?

Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: HardcoreB] #3089282
10/26/22 08:43 AM
10/26/22 08:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,008
Finally a HUSKER again
Moparnut426 Offline
I Live Here
Moparnut426  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,008
Finally a HUSKER again
They look like someone used their heads, and used a solid lifter body modified to use the new lifters from the new production V6 engines I see everyday. they are modified to use a ball end pushrod, but these are whats in say todays chrysler 3.6 cylinder heads.

3.6 Lifter.jpg
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: gregsdart] #3089291
10/26/22 09:22 AM
10/26/22 09:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 876
Missouri
J
jwb123 Offline
super stock
jwb123  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 876
Missouri
Originally Posted by gregsdart
I recall remarks by David Vizzard about how different oil formulations (same weight) affected lifter function. I wonder if any difference would show up on the new Comps.? Might be interesting, but very time consuming to do all the testing.


I have installed several sets of Morel hydraulic roller lifters in builds this summer, Pontiac, GM and Mopar. Instruction sheet with the lifters mentioned required centistoke rating of the oil. After researching the spec, 10W30 oil is the thickest recommended. In comparing the lifters run quieter and oil better to the rockers with the thinner oil. I had been using 20W40 Rotella as a break-in oil. I changed to a mineral based 10W30 oil.

Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: jwb123] #3089336
10/26/22 11:53 AM
10/26/22 11:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 570
UK
rb446 Offline
mopar
rb446  Offline
mopar

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 570
UK
The problem explained on another mopar site is not necessarily to do with the hyd. roller lifters, its the stock blocks themselves. This is a just 1 post by challenger340.... PRH took part in this thread, most of you know all this anyway but it may be useful info for others>


The problem many face when using Hydraulic Rollers in BB Mopars, an Engine never designed or envisioned to use them, is the very short distance between where the very large Oil Gallery intersects the lifter Bore, and the bottom of the Bore itself, which is also the exact spot where maximum Lifter Bore wear occurs in old Blocks, allowing excessive lifeblood Oil Pressure leakage out, rather than into the Lifter maintaining preload.

Add to the above,
that Hydraulic Roller Cams require higher V/Spring Pressures to keep up with the increased ramp Roller Lobes, and you have a situation where lifeblood Oil Pressure to maintain Lifter preload and valvetrain stability is fighting against the worn Bores and higher Spring pressure trying to keep it out ..... clackity.... clackity... clackity.... or very poor rpm capability.

Interesting to note here:
is that when CRANE was initially doing the R & D for Hydraulic Rollers with FORD back in the early 80's.... one of the first identified Block design changes was to Lengthen the Lifter Bore castings themselves to assist in Lifter sealing.... hence the Mid-80's Ford "HR" smallblocks with the taller(longer) lifter Bores.
The same was done over at GM etc., as they were updating castings to run HR's... they all lengthened the Lifter Bores in the HR Blocks for this reason.

The best answer for trying to run HR Lifters in these old BB Mopar Blocks with the Short & usually normally Lifter Bore bottoms.... seems to be one of 2 things:
1.) Bush the Lifter Bores to control leakage, an extremely expensive proposition
or,
2.) Run the HR Lifter basically bottomed out for adjustment, with only about .010" or so plunger preload remaining.... so basically running as a Solid.

#2 is now the prescribed "FIX" at pretty much all Cam Manu's for BB Mopar's when you phone to complain as many do.... of "noisey valvetrain"
and,
begging the question, if so many are having to run the HR Lifter Plungers in BB Mopars down .080", .090", even .105" to shut them up, basically "Bottomed" with 3 & 4 Adjuster Threads hanging out the bottom of the Rockers, why not just run a tight lash Solid "Street" Roller Cam instead ? with even more power/Trq than the HR ?

Anybody with a dis-assembled Block ?
Take a flashlight and go LOOK at the bottom of the Lifter Bores and the distance between where the Oil gallery intersects it to out the bottom.... see what I am referring to here, even better put a Bore gauge in their for yourself if you have access to one.

Link to full thread
www.dodgecharger.com/forum/index.php?topic=128846.0;all

Last edited by rb446; 10/26/22 11:58 AM.

1969 'Cuda 446ci, best 9.96@133.9 in 1990
1971 340 'Cuda, best 11.01@122.8 in 1987
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: rb446] #3089343
10/26/22 12:28 PM
10/26/22 12:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,822
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,822
Kirkland, Washington
Good post rb446. That brings up a very interesting issue that seems to need more awareness.

Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #3089376
10/26/22 01:47 PM
10/26/22 01:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by Pacnorthcuda
Good post rb446. That brings up a very interesting issue that seems to need more awareness.


I was wondering about this myself , I have a block that I bushed the lifter bores and want to run a HYD. roller in it , maybe I accidently fixed a potential issue ?

BUT how big a hole do you need to put in the bushing, I had 1/8" holes put in them?


running up my post count some more .
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: JohnRR] #3089378
10/26/22 02:00 PM
10/26/22 02:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 570
UK
rb446 Offline
mopar
rb446  Offline
mopar

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 570
UK
There was a video I was watching on some guys who bought a reaming/bushing kit albeit for SB which showed them doing i, they put 1/8" hole in the bushings also.


1969 'Cuda 446ci, best 9.96@133.9 in 1990
1971 340 'Cuda, best 11.01@122.8 in 1987
Re: New HR lifters...... first test [Re: rb446] #3089404
10/26/22 03:21 PM
10/26/22 03:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,485
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,485
SoCal
The BB Mopar is THE BIGGEST candidate for lifter bore bushings when it comes to roller lifters in general, but specifically hyd. roller lifters...and once you do this, it's amazing how much more oil you'll have going to the rods and mains, and much better oil pressure at idle and low engine speeds (street driving).
It's all I recommend now days...it really corrects that engine's oil system.


Brian Hafliger
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1