Re: Bulkhead connector terminals
[Re: Ronnman]
#3026854
03/23/22 05:48 PM
03/23/22 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Once again, originals ARE NOT exactly Packard 56s. The are just a vaild replacement which share same plugs, but the correct ones are really Packard 58s.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
Re: Bulkhead connector terminals
[Re: burdar]
#3027069
03/24/22 01:13 PM
03/24/22 01:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095 Valencia, España
NachoRT74
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,095
Valencia, España
|
Yeap. Some 56s fit some lousy into some plugs/insulators, there are small differences betwen some plugs, but IN GENERAL, they are good replacements for the allmost unexistant 58s
The problem is actually with the females, not with males. ( just like in the nature LOL )
Due the lack of terminals in Venezuela where I fixed my wiring, I used the "yazaki" kind terminals ( shown on the link I posted from FABO ) which are locally made, and I got good success with them.
With a Charger born in Chrysler assembly plant in Valencia, Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|