Building 68 Barracuda track car
#2955876
08/21/21 12:59 AM
08/21/21 12:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704 USA
rftroy
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704
USA
|
I have a 68 barracuda fastback, which used to be my daily driver many years ago, until the engine blew. I've decided to turn it into a track car. I plan to use it on track days at Willow and such places, and in Lucky Dog endurance races. So, it will have a full roll cage and tubing structure all the way to the front of the rails to make it a stiff racing chassis. I never thought I'd get around to this due to the cost, but I took stock and realized after decades of mis-spending my youth, I have almost all the parts I need sitting in the garage.
Question is: Does anyone here have experience, or knowledge of, specific preparation techniques for a 68 Fastback Barracuda? Particularly aerodynamics, but also durability parameters for 8 hour + races.
I will be using a 340 block probably with trick flow heads. I have a spare close ratio four speed out of a dead TA, and an aluminum case for an A body I can put the gear set in. I will be using an 8-3/4 and brakes all around from Dr. Diff; the 13 inches with Viper calipers and the Ford rear discs; and I have a couple sets of Kit Car springs.
A few of the aerodynamic issues I can see right now are 1. an appropriate rear deck spoiler; 2. extractors or venting of the hood for cooling and lift reduction issues. 3. general smoothing of certain areas of the car to lower Cd, windshield edges, etc. I expect I'll also need to install at least a rear end cooler, and possibly a transmission cooler, which is where people's experience would come in.
Any knowledge or experience is welcome, or links to work people have done in the past with this particular car.
Thanks, Robert
AAR 4-speed 3.91, Tor-Red; 70 440 6 pack Roadrunner 4-speed 3.54, Plum Crazy; 68 Formula S conv 383 4-speed 3.23, Electric Blue; 69 Barracuda conv Slant 6 OD4 2.94, 71 B5 Blue; 78 Lil' Red Truck, Red; 70 Challenger S/E. 505 6 pack, Passon 5-speed, 3.55, B7 Blue
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: rftroy]
#2956286
08/22/21 12:56 PM
08/22/21 12:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442 NW Chicago suburban area
Mopar Mitch
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442
NW Chicago suburban area
|
Brian Garcia has an ultimate 67-9 B'Cuda fastback setup for road course racing... runs vintage historic W2W events in the midwest. He's been very successful and a crowd favorite.
Mopar Mitch
"Road racers and autocrossers go in deeper and come out harder!"... and rain never stops us from having fun with our cars... in fact, it makes us better drivers!
Check out MOPAR ACTION MAGAZINE, August 2006 issue for feature article and specs on my autocross T/A!
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: rftroy]
#2956351
08/22/21 03:05 PM
08/22/21 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
In this order:
1. Driver track/seat time
2. safety equipment ( makes the driver braver)
3. Tires
4. Suspension
5. Brakes
6. Oil Pan
7. Engine/trans
8. Weight reduction
9. Aero
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: Mopar Mitch]
#2957837
08/27/21 12:07 AM
08/27/21 12:07 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704 USA
rftroy
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704
USA
|
I have sent a PM to Brian Garcia, but I see that he posts very rarely here, so no idea if he will answer. Does anyone know how to contact him who would ask his permission to give me his personal contact information? I expect that he has plenty of lessons learned that would save time and effort going down some wrong roads.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks, Robert
Also, I just remembered Steve - autoxcuda and his Barracuda sedan. Hopefully he'll see this thread and chime in.
Last edited by rftroy; 08/27/21 12:14 AM.
AAR 4-speed 3.91, Tor-Red; 70 440 6 pack Roadrunner 4-speed 3.54, Plum Crazy; 68 Formula S conv 383 4-speed 3.23, Electric Blue; 69 Barracuda conv Slant 6 OD4 2.94, 71 B5 Blue; 78 Lil' Red Truck, Red; 70 Challenger S/E. 505 6 pack, Passon 5-speed, 3.55, B7 Blue
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: rftroy]
#2957841
08/27/21 12:30 AM
08/27/21 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,052 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,052
Oregon
|
I'd be very surprised if you need to worry about aero. We had Tim's red Valiant going 160 mph on the front straight at PIR without much aero work. Just had a big homemade air dam up front and that was it. Had the car as low as it could go while still having a little bit of suspension travel. If you are staying with the factory T bar and leaf spring suspension then you most likely won't be able to get going fast enough around a road course to worry about aero.
I also think you'll need more than a 340 with TF heads and a four speed before you need to worry about aero. The last engine we had in Tim's car was a 427 with heavily ported heads. It was a brutally fast street car but not a real terror on the race track, especially with high gears out back and a four speed. If you want to scare yourself I'd suggest a boosted Gen III Hemi and a 5 or 6 speed transmission.
Last edited by AndyF; 08/27/21 12:47 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: AndyF]
#2957853
08/27/21 02:37 AM
08/27/21 02:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704 USA
rftroy
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 704
USA
|
Thanks Andy. I'll keep that in mind as I'm doing the design and math.
My goals are to have fun and learn to drive better. One of my design parameters is to use as many parts as I have on hand in my garage, which as I said earlier comprise a lot of what I'll require.
I'l be looking at some of the various racing leagues, the more entry-level ones, and try and get some data on power to weight ratio's versus speed and time at particular tracks. That should give me an idea where I might stand, and how I might need to adjust my build parameters.
I've read some of your previous posts about turn-of-the-century Corvettes being a better option for a low budget track car, and I mostly agree, especially if you're talking about unmodified, ie low stiffness, 60's 70's Chrysler chassis. However, A full space frame tubing chassis welded onto the existing car changes that equation somewhat.
I don't see that a properly done torsion bar and rear leaf spring design would be a hindrance to track speed. However, you did write factory T bar setup. The one major issue that can't be overcome building a car on the factory chassis is that you are severely limited as to how much you can lower the front end as the lower control arm comes in contact with the frame rail. Historical way to fix that is to raise the front sub frame in relation to the rest of the chassis or as the Chrysler books say "lower the body on the frame". But now we're in a whole nother world of high dollar. What would be a simple and effective solution would be to use a drop spindle. This is a perfectly acceptable design that would lower both your CG and your front role center. However, I've done the research, and I have to agree that there isn't a good one available. A properly designed spindle, with the proper materials and processes, could be produced by casting. But, I'd need a lot of data like fracture toughness, static load test results, dynamic load life test data, and assurance that it wasn't made in China, to be able to trust it. I don't see getting any of that from the current manufacturers.
So, I will set my performance expectations for what I can do based on what I've got, and have as much fun as I can with that and learn what I can at that level. I'm not looking to set the world on fire (for now). And I will use the Barracuda instead of buying a Corvette because 1. I have a clean fastback chassis I bought for 500 bucks many years ago, and 2. because the Barracuda's cooler.
i'm actually kind of surprised you didn't see any aerodynamic affects over, say, 120. But, every aerodynamic configuration is different. So I'm still going to look into finding whatever historical data that I can. People have been racing this set up for about 50 years. And I'll do my own testing once I get the thing together.
Thanks for your input. I may be sending you requests for lessons learned in the future as I'm working on this thing.
Robert
AAR 4-speed 3.91, Tor-Red; 70 440 6 pack Roadrunner 4-speed 3.54, Plum Crazy; 68 Formula S conv 383 4-speed 3.23, Electric Blue; 69 Barracuda conv Slant 6 OD4 2.94, 71 B5 Blue; 78 Lil' Red Truck, Red; 70 Challenger S/E. 505 6 pack, Passon 5-speed, 3.55, B7 Blue
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: rftroy]
#2958014
08/27/21 02:44 PM
08/27/21 02:44 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
Thanks Andy. I'll keep that in mind as I'm doing the design and math.
My goals are to have fun and learn to drive better. Maybe, but what you have written in your responses, so far, do not back that up. This seems to be common whenever these threads pop up, and as I responded, and Andy touched on, driver skills almost trump EVERYTHING else you have touched on, and your concern/focus about aero supports your naivety on the subject, and don't be offended by my bluntness, at one time everyone on this site also started out knowing basically nothing. That doesn't imply you know nothing, but that you still have a bit to learn relative to others here. If you want me to sugarcoat my answers, sorry, ain't going to happen, I have nothing to peddle.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: rftroy]
#2958017
08/27/21 03:01 PM
08/27/21 03:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442 NW Chicago suburban area
Mopar Mitch
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442
NW Chicago suburban area
|
Robert -- I'm good friends with Brian... locally live nearby. I'll reach out to him for you.. he's a pretty busy guy.
PM sent to you just now...
Last edited by Mopar Mitch; 08/27/21 03:27 PM.
Mopar Mitch
"Road racers and autocrossers go in deeper and come out harder!"... and rain never stops us from having fun with our cars... in fact, it makes us better drivers!
Check out MOPAR ACTION MAGAZINE, August 2006 issue for feature article and specs on my autocross T/A!
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: 68rrunner]
#2958223
08/28/21 09:32 AM
08/28/21 09:32 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
"Once I started seeing the mechanical cornering of the Road Runner hitting its limits, you HAVE to start looking at the air. "
You do realize how far into the OP's future on this project that is, right?
We also might disagree on the primary purpose of useful aero effects, IMO, its to enhance the proper mechanical set-up of the car, not fix other poor choice problems.
And it was #9 on my list.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: jcc]
#2958453
08/28/21 07:57 PM
08/28/21 07:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,841 A collage of whims
topside
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,841
A collage of whims
|
Well, aero matters from about 60 on up; that was proven by Car and Driver decades ago in a fairly thorough experiment. That said, there's a lot more to be gained, in larger amounts, with the basics, as already pointed out. OP needs to decide on his budget, and I'd advise developing skills before spending $$$ building the car.
The aero gains on that body primarily involve the deep & open grilles and a profile that benefits from a rear spoiler. I'd flush or block the upper grille openings, use the valance for intake, add an air dam, and vent the hood. A rear spoiler that extends up from the upper rear face of the trunk lid works pretty well; that face has a decent angle.
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: topside]
#2959571
08/31/21 04:16 PM
08/31/21 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 801 central CT
cudazappa
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 801
central CT
|
as far as building the car: Figure out the who you're going to spend most of the time running with and get their rule book. That will outline what you can and can't do to your car. Unless you want to just get bumped to an unlimited class. Once you have the rulebook my rule of thumb is: 1) chassis, make it as stiff and safe as the rules say 2) determine tires, budget/rules 3) suspension, rules/tires
Everything else comes after that. The most important part is the nut behind the wheel.
1971 Challenger
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: cudazappa]
#2959861
09/01/21 11:26 AM
09/01/21 11:26 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442 NW Chicago suburban area
Mopar Mitch
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,442
NW Chicago suburban area
|
As Cudazappa has stated... Best advice to anyone intending to run with a club at sanctioned events... is to first look at their classes and rules. Even if you aren't immediately going to run with a club... build the car according to some rules and classes from an organized club... you'll be glad you did in the long run.
Mopar Mitch
"Road racers and autocrossers go in deeper and come out harder!"... and rain never stops us from having fun with our cars... in fact, it makes us better drivers!
Check out MOPAR ACTION MAGAZINE, August 2006 issue for feature article and specs on my autocross T/A!
|
|
|
Re: Building 68 Barracuda track car
[Re: topside]
#2959884
09/01/21 12:36 PM
09/01/21 12:36 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
Well, aero matters from about 60 on up; that was proven by Car and Driver decades ago in a fairly thorough experiment. That said, there's a lot more to be gained, in larger amounts, with the basics, as already pointed out. OP needs to decide on his budget, and I'd advise developing skills before spending $$$ building the car.
The aero gains on that body primarily involve the deep & open grilles and a profile that benefits from a rear spoiler. I'd flush or block the upper grille openings, use the valance for intake, add an air dam, and vent the hood. A rear spoiler that extends up from the upper rear face of the trunk lid works pretty well; that face has a decent angle. If I understand this discussion so far. member Andy is the only one to maybe poo poo aero IMO. To restate my point, on my original posted priority list for areas of concern for the OP's project, aero is the LAST issue of 9 he needs to deal with. I never said nor implied to anyone it has no effect or nor importance at any speed. As I believe as a matter of fact, and supported by my posted builds here over time,, IMO, I'm indeed a huge believer and follower of Aero solutions. Strangely I suspect and noted just for conversation sake, at the F1 level, my list is almost completely reversed, but then of course, this is not F1, stating the obvious.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
|
|