Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: NANKET]
#2951819
08/08/21 05:44 PM
08/08/21 05:44 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,203 Michigan
A727Tflite
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,203
Michigan
|
Looking to buy a 2003 Cummins 4x4 auto. 180,000 miles. Well taken care of clean truck.
I would use it for general truck use and hauling cars on open trailer. Max 2500 miles a year. I won’t use it for daily driving. What can you tell me about these trucks. Don’t tell me to buy a hemi truck, not going there. When does any trans problems show up? When do they need fuel system or injector work Anything’s to Look out for or problems they have. Thanks! Is it a 2003 or 2003.5? The 2003.5 has the 48RE, that trans is pretty good if maintained. The biggest issue is keeping the front band adjusted. Let it get away from you and you will ruin the front drum and smoke the front clutch. Don’t use anything but ATF + 4 in it. I’ve seen hundreds of 250K plus mile units in the Reman program, nothing wrong with them except that front band and drum.
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: NANKET]
#2951822
08/08/21 05:59 PM
08/08/21 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679 Los Osos, Ca
CKessel
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 679
Los Osos, Ca
|
Trans issues can happen anytime. If it has not been done yet, plan on a rebuild using better frictions, shift kit and a billet converter with a lower stall. Getting the trans redone with the low stall converter really gains some power to the wheels as it cuts way down on slippage and heat which kills the trans and loses efficiency. Injectors can need replacing anytime past 100k. Depends on how clean the system was kept and whose filters got used for replacement. Cummins had one that went down to 7 micron which replaced the oe 10 micron unit. I think Baldwin had one that went a little finer. Fuel cleanliness is a big issue on the common rail systems. Has the lift pump been replaced and/or upgraded to the in tank unit like what's used on 05 and later? Depending on power output sought, you can run that or an Airdog or FASS unit which can give you better filtration too. If you replace the injectors, do not use remans. Only new BOSCH or BBI units. New BOSCH can be had from injectors direct.com. You will need the feed tubes too as they have little filters inside them. BBI makes a really good unit if you plan on upping the power but they are not emissions legal. BOSCH does make a 50hp new unit which is what I have in my 04.5 truck. Different spray pattern from yours due to piston design. If you check out cumminsforum.com or the Turbo Diesel Registry, you'll find a wealth of info for the truck. TDR has a quarterly publication you can get a subscription to which is the bomb for information about the trucks. Only deals with Dodge/Cummins from 89 on. No fluff, just great info and no bs to make advertisers happy.
Carl Kessel
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: A727Tflite]
#2951825
08/08/21 06:18 PM
08/08/21 06:18 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,234 aZLiViN
J_BODY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,234
aZLiViN
|
As t-man said…. 48RE mucho better…. and his advice spot on. IIRC the 47RE early builds still had the data plates on the timing cover, the newer it was a white decal on the valve cover. I’d be very surprised if it still had the “walker pump” on it…. The OE lift pump was attached to the back of the fuel filter housing. I used to grab a small hammer to perform “cpr” on them when they’d come in on the hook as they’d fail often. Didn’t hurt anything in my experience, but obviously aggravating when it occurred (no start/eng dies). Around 05 they came stock with the lift pump in the tank and “retrofit kits” were made available for the older trucks and most I see anymore have been “upgraded”. If it hasn’t been upgraded I’d be carrying one under the seat A/C will always be a few degrees cooler on drivers side…. Nature of the beast. Temp gets too different from side to side = low charge. Injector life…. Sure swapped alot of sets around the 180-225k mark. If you free rev it and it comes down to idle nice and smooth that’s a good thing. Rev it and it hangs at rpm and tumbles back to idle unevenly that’s a sign of things to come. I’m not a huge “additive” fan, but I’ve seen CRC DIESEL FUEL THERAPY do some pretty amazing things.
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: J_BODY]
#2951837
08/08/21 06:58 PM
08/08/21 06:58 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 632 Casco, MI
Savoy1964
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 632
Casco, MI
|
my 2003 never had transmission problems after i upgraded to BD Diesel Converter- Valve body with pressure loc. Deep pan. Pulled 28ft enclosed no problem in overdrive. Now i did have the bottom of the Axle rot out and had to replace it but got the better 3.73 gear, bed sides had to be replaced typical rust through, and rack and pinion but that is about all in 150000 miles.
2003 Dodge 3500 Diesel
1964 Plymouth Savoy White 2dr sdn. 512 stroked, Dominator, New Best 9.75 @ 138.50mph 2019 Challenger Scat Pack 1320 White Knuckle-K&N Cold air filter, Billit Oil catch can, drag radials stock 11.911 @ 114mph
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: Savoy1964]
#2951847
08/08/21 07:25 PM
08/08/21 07:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,958 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart
Rhinotruck
|
Rhinotruck
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,958
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
|
Just don't let me drive it, no more 48RE's for me! LOL Be sure to change the injectors around 200K miles and get some good ones! Biggest issues with the common rail are the injectors, killed two of them one when an injector went wide open and hydraulic'd the engine and another when one went dead and burned a piston. Both had around 250K on them...
Last edited by Rhinodart; 08/08/21 07:32 PM.
The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.
JB Rhinehart, Realist
A-Body's RULE!
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: Savoy1964]
#2951848
08/08/21 07:26 PM
08/08/21 07:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,156 Las Vegas, NV
Tom_440
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,156
Las Vegas, NV
|
I have 2003 non HO. Did injectors at about 220,000 miles. Upgraded to FASS pump and filters at that time because I don't want to buy injectors again. Keep an eye on the trans temp. I added a deep trans pan as well. If you don't have gauges, then get some or an Edge or something that lets you see what's happening. Nothing wrong with watching your EGT either. The dash will crack if it isn't already. There is an airbag recall and some have a front end recall.
The late 2003 HO cummins has more power, so that would be a plus. Its easy to make these engines make a lot of power, but then you start breaking stuff, starting with the trans. And the "bulletproof" trans is $$ unless you built it yourself. Its been a good truck and I've got about 270,000 miles on it now.
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: NANKET]
#2951851
08/08/21 07:29 PM
08/08/21 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,203 Michigan
A727Tflite
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,203
Michigan
|
Mfg date 6-03 on the door sticker. The lift pump has been changed. It now has a unit under the fuel filler neck.
Looks like front cover on engine is leaking down low and has oil on the crank sensor and steering box. No dripping where it parks, just damp. Looks like the fan is blowing the oil around. The power steering is full and th cap has oil residue so it hasn’t been off in a long time. The PS fluid stinks.
The ATF is red and smells good, some black came off the stick on the white towel. Pan is barely damp and dirty, hasn’t been off recently, Look at the front band adjustment stud. If it is even with the locknut then the band is on its last leg. Could be fine for a long time but keep an eye out for 2-3 flare. If it starts doing that I would drop the trans and re-clutch it with new front band. As for hauling, you mention hauling cars. More than one at a time? If no, the production converter is fine. The 48RE has more controller logic than the 47, it is capable of going in to lockup in 2,3, and 4th based on temperature of the trans fluid. The Mopar Reman converters have improved stators and stator clutch components not found in other Remans.
Last edited by Transman; 08/08/21 07:36 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: NITROUSN]
#2951901
08/08/21 09:48 PM
08/08/21 09:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,954 northwest USA
NANKET
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,954
northwest USA
|
[u][/u] A truck 18 years old and 180K on the clock. Grow some big ones and buy it and be prepared to suck it up when it fails. Its always a mixed bag. Gee thanks for your help mr cocky! I never owned one or been around one so I’m asking questions. I’ve learned a lot From this thread, but not from you. I’ not scared just want to be informed if that’s OK with you.
|
|
|
Re: Tell me good/bad on a 2003 Cummins with auto trans
[Re: NANKET]
#2951905
08/08/21 10:18 PM
08/08/21 10:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,958 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart
Rhinotruck
|
Rhinotruck
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,958
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
|
I personally liked the 305 555 common rail, seemed to get the best fuel mileage and towing an open trailer you won't even need to take it out of OD...
The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.
JB Rhinehart, Realist
A-Body's RULE!
|
|
|
|
|