Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
#2852562
11/28/20 02:01 PM
11/28/20 02:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,395 Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,395
Highland, MI.
|
Our gas tank water heater is 15 years old - getting to the time where it is going to expire sooner than later. Question I have for y'all, what is your experience with the tankless water heater systems? How well do they work - can they keep up with 2 people taking a shower at the same time, etc? Any advice on brands? Also, electric vs. natural gas? (or are they all electric?)
Thanks.
No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: 340Cuda]
#2852596
11/28/20 03:27 PM
11/28/20 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791
Rio Linda, CA
|
I was very interested in one but found in a retrofit the cost the unit and the installation costs made them uneconomical. However my hot water heaters are inside mechanical closets inside the house. Same here, the units I looked out required a minimum 3/4" line for natural gas and mine is 1/2" coming out of a concrete slab. Retrofit would be cost prohibitive but I like the concept.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#2852614
11/28/20 03:52 PM
11/28/20 03:52 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,510 Tulsa, Oklahoma
340Cuda
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,510
Tulsa, Oklahoma
|
I was very interested in one but found in a retrofit the cost the unit and the installation costs made them uneconomical. However my hot water heaters are inside mechanical closets inside the house. Same here, the units I looked out required a minimum 3/4" line for natural gas and mine is 1/2" coming out of a concrete slab. Retrofit would be cost prohibitive but I like the concept. The ones I looked at needed a different vent through the roof also. However I am with you I like the concept, just could not get the numbers to work.
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: 340Cuda]
#2852619
11/28/20 04:04 PM
11/28/20 04:04 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 712 New Jersey
Dartforforty
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 712
New Jersey
|
My son installs this brand https://www.rinnai.us/They changed the gas valve and can be vented with PVC pipe The different gas valve makes it so a smaller gas pipe size can be run to it All on demand water heaters require an annual flush to prevent scaling
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: Dartforforty]
#2852622
11/28/20 04:20 PM
11/28/20 04:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
|
so as stated above. The size you need and cost increase will be due to usage. retrofitting gas lines can be expensive. 220 volts could be used instead of gas. But the key thing most people miss is that the units are based on temp difference. They mostly can only do a 40 degree temp increase as it passes through the system. That is what you need to check on. I mostly used them overseas, where the outside temp was in the 70 at night and incoming water didn't get much colder than that. But if you get 50 degree water coming in and you only get a max of 40 degrees up, then you get 90 degree water coming out of your shower. not going to cut it for most people. payback is also a hard pill for most to swallow. An installed water heater tanked is maybe going to run 1k depending on how big and fancy it is. A tankless unit that can accommodate 2 showers and maybe laundry is going to cost well over that just for the unit. https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.supplyhouse.com/product_files/Rinnai-RU199IN-Temp-Map.pdf this one says it can handle 35 degree water https://www.supplyhouse.com/Rinnai-...QPg7-gI3ubQpnrCqphMTw_o78z0aAgJ2EALw_wcB but it runs 1700 just for the unit. https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.supplyhouse.com/product_files/Rinnai-RU199IN-Product-Overview.pdfat the bottom shows the delta it gets based on flow.
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: Andrewh]
#2852654
11/28/20 05:48 PM
11/28/20 05:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,395 Highland, MI.
Sunroofcuda
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,395
Highland, MI.
|
We have well water & this time of year it is COLD. A 40^ increase is not going to cut it for us unfortunately. The size unit we have right now is going to cost 1k, without installation. One of my BIL's is a plumber, so installation is not a worry.
No Man With A Good Car Needs To Be Justified
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: Sunroofcuda]
#2852657
11/28/20 05:52 PM
11/28/20 05:52 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701 Northern California
lilcuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701
Northern California
|
The other thing to consider is the hardness of your water. Tankless water heaters don’t last with hard water. We had our whole house replumbed a few years ago and I asked about going tankless. Plumber talked me out of it and into a recirculating pump instead.
'67 is an abbreviation of 1967 67' is an abbreviation of 67 feet They are not interchangeable.
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: Sunroofcuda]
#2852658
11/28/20 06:00 PM
11/28/20 06:00 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
Andrewh
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,671
|
We have well water & this time of year it is COLD. A 40^ increase is not going to cut it for us unfortunately. The size unit we have right now is going to cost 1k, without installation. One of my BIL's is a plumber, so installation is not a worry. the one I linked at 1700 bucks will do a 100 degree delta at 4gpm so it would be plenty for a modern shower, maybe 2. but as I metioned it is expensive compared to a standard heater.
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: Andrewh]
#2852761
11/28/20 10:47 PM
11/28/20 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126 Here
DirectSubjection
Tacohead. The First and Only
|
Tacohead. The First and Only
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 70,126
Here
|
In the past I ran into a minimum flow rate issue at a client's house. I needed just a bit of hot to amke the water come out around 78 degrees. After a bit it would shut off, registering too low a flow rate to keep heating. I think current units handle this better tho
Ride eternal, shiny and chrome
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: 5thAve]
#2853186
11/30/20 12:31 AM
11/30/20 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,479 On the run…
BloFish
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 16,479
On the run…
|
I just installed one in my guest house, it’s a great space saver with unlimited hot water.
It really doesn't matter whether you win or lose… as long as you look good doing it!
‘65 A100 ‘69 ‘Cuda ‘73 Vega GT ‘06 Mega Cab ‘14 Mercedes SLK
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#2853632
12/01/20 12:09 AM
12/01/20 12:09 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
I thought the main advantage of the tank vs tankless is, its mainly a point of use solution, ie, you get instant hot/heated water, and you are not heating water running thru uninsulated pipes, over a long run, meaning smaller tankless at as many locations as you have/can afford, and you don't need to constantly maintain gallons of hot water away from its point of need.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
Re: Water Heaters: Tank vs. Tankless?
[Re: jcc]
#2854815
12/03/20 02:14 PM
12/03/20 02:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,232 Chicago, IL
PLUM_72
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,232
Chicago, IL
|
Tank all the way! Call me crazy, but I like the idea of having 50 gallons of fresh water sitting in my house. Its a nice to have if the SHTF.
1972 Dodge Challenger
|
|
|
|
|