Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Suregrip391]
#284833
04/11/09 04:59 PM
04/11/09 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
your same coil will work you are now just switching it's primary off/on electronically instead of mechanically. I'd get the 1.25 ohm ballast & I would highly suggest that you get the MP chrome box instead of the orange ecu even if it means you buy the dist/harness/ecu seperately instead of the orange box complete pkg. EDIT if you do change coils yes a 73 up stock one will be fine as you would have exactly the same as a factory oe 73 up setup but unless you had one in your stash you might get a hotter one such as a msd blaster 2(which MAY change the ballast requirements) but your stock coil will work fine.
Last edited by RapidRobert; 04/11/09 05:19 PM.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: RapidRobert]
#284836
04/11/09 05:56 PM
04/11/09 05:56 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978 USA
Suregrip391
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978
USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
The Mopar kit comes with a new ballast, do you think its the 1.25 ohm? Just trying to set myself up with all the right parts while waiting for my kit to show up.
(1) yes (2) You have the orange box(kit) ordered?
Yes, it comes with the orange box. I am buying a set from a member here, its new in the box, never used.
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Suregrip391]
#284837
04/11/09 06:28 PM
04/11/09 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
The odds are very high that you wont have a single issue with the orange box.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Suregrip391]
#284838
04/11/09 09:19 PM
04/11/09 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,441 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,441
So Cal
|
While updating the ignition, consider the following: 1. Upgrade to the chrome box 2. Upgrade to the Mopar Blaster coil 3. Upgrade ballast resistor to 0.25 Ohms Next when setting the timing, note that the Mopar distributor has 20 degrees and you should set the inital advance @ 14-16 degrees. Making a total of 34-36 degrees. Just my $0.025..
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Sinitro]
#284839
04/11/09 09:22 PM
04/11/09 09:22 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978 USA
Suregrip391
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978
USA
|
Quote:
While updating the ignition, consider the following:
1. Upgrade to the chrome box 2. Upgrade to the Mopar Blaster coil 3. Upgrade ballast resistor to 0.25 Ohms
Next when setting the timing, note that the Mopar distributor has 20 degrees and you should set the inital advance @ 14-16 degrees. Making a total of 34-36 degrees.
Just my $0.025..
Did you mean 1.25 ohms? The one that comes with the kit from Mopar Performance?
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Suregrip391]
#284840
04/11/09 09:33 PM
04/11/09 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,441 So Cal
Sinitro
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,441
So Cal
|
The electronic kit comes with a 1.25 Ohms but when you use a Mopar Blaster coil (Mopar #4876732), you use a 0.25 Ohms (Mopar #2444641). Because the Blaster has higher output voltage and can handle a higher input voltage, when using a 0.25 Ohm vs the 1.25 Ohms the coil sees a higher voltage. Just my $0.025..
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: Sinitro]
#284841
04/11/09 10:15 PM
04/11/09 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978 USA
Suregrip391
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,978
USA
|
Quote:
The electronic kit comes with a 1.25 Ohms but when you use a Mopar Blaster coil (Mopar #4876732), you use a 0.25 Ohms (Mopar #2444641). Because the Blaster has higher output voltage and can handle a higher input voltage, when using a 0.25 Ohm vs the 1.25 Ohms the coil sees a higher voltage.
Just my $0.025..
Thanks for the help, just to clarify, if using the stock point type coil currently on my car, just use the 1.25 OHM resistor that comes with the kit, if I use the Mopar Blaster coil, use the .25 ohm resistor. The purpose of the Mopar blaster coil and .25 ohm resistor is for a hotter spark? Better performance? As mentioned, this car is all stock, 2-brl carb, 383, automatic. Not a race car by any means.
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
[Re: DAYCLONA]
#284846
04/11/09 11:44 PM
04/11/09 11:44 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I'd avoid the "el crapo" Chrysler Electronic Ignition,....IMHO your much better off with a Pertronix Ignitor II set-up and coil,....eliminate the ballast in the set-up,
in the Pertronix conversion you get to keep your original point distributor, just install the coversion kit, everything fits under the stock cap......
!!!REALLY!!! I guess the hundreds of thousands of Chryslers that ran for hundreds of thousands of miles using the el crapo Chrysler ignition were just, lucky?
I put on of these in my '70 soon after they came out in, when, 72? I owned that car up into the '80's. Later, I ran a 340 in my old FJ40 Landcruiser, and guess what? I ran an el crapo Chrysler ECU in that too!! Last time it ran, it ran with the el crapo ECU
|
|
|
Re: Stock coil or should it be changed? Points to Electroni
#284847
04/12/09 12:26 AM
04/12/09 12:26 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'd avoid the "el crapo" Chrysler Electronic Ignition,....IMHO your much better off with a Pertronix Ignitor II set-up and coil,....eliminate the ballast in the set-up,
in the Pertronix conversion you get to keep your original point distributor, just install the coversion kit, everything fits under the stock cap......
!!!REALLY!!! I guess the hundreds of thousands of Chryslers that ran for hundreds of thousands of miles using the el crapo Chrysler ignition were just, lucky?
I put on of these in my '70 soon after they came out in, when, 72? I owned that car up into the '80's. Later, I ran a 340 in my old FJ40 Landcruiser, and guess what? I ran an el crapo Chrysler ECU in that too!! Last time it ran, it ran with the el crapo ECU
Yeah but why add in all the extra wiring and clutter when the pertronix will keep it clean, simple and stock looking and do just as good of a job at it?
|
|
|
|
|