Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
New Best @ Cecil #2837537
10/26/20 12:31 PM
10/26/20 12:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
JACK1440 Offline OP
mopar
JACK1440  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
Took the cuda out Saturday and it ran a new best. It's been a long fight but, we're getting there after figuring out back in June that the car was driving thru the converter and having a new one made. We got the power to the ground. Next challenge is suspension. The car still has SS springs on it and I'm thinking they just won't handle the hit. If you don't mind take a look at the video and give me you opinions. The car is still all steel other then the hood and front bumper. I'm thinking caltracs. The car picked up 5 tenths and 11 mph from the converter swap. I never thought I'd see that much.

60' - 1.371
330' - 3.889
1/8 - 6.002
1/8 mph - 116.6
1000' - 7.826
1/4 - 9.366
mph - 145.67

Cecil 102420


https://youtu.be/BlWNW6XH69o

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837540
10/26/20 12:38 PM
10/26/20 12:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,402
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,402
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Congrats on the new best! My first thought after watching the video is the entire suspension looks too loose to me. A lot of movement.
Cal-tracs would definitely be an improvement, but new shocks all around should be on the list too. Maybe just ladder bar it since you already have big tires and tubs. up


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837561
10/26/20 01:44 PM
10/26/20 01:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,686
W. Kentucky
justinp61 Offline
I Live Here
justinp61  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,686
W. Kentucky
If it were mine and a dedicated drag car I'd go straight to a four link and be done.

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: justinp61] #2837629
10/26/20 04:06 PM
10/26/20 04:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
When my friends 68 Charger was running high 9’s on Cal-tracs....... and experiencing rather short life from the sidewalks of the slicks...... and struggling a bit with some consistency........ he finally put ladder bars on it.
His comment to me was, “I should’ve done it ten years ago”.

That set-up is still working well, now at the low-9’s with 60’ times in the 1.20’s.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837668
10/26/20 05:36 PM
10/26/20 05:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,305
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,305
Bend,OR USA
Did you left on the throttle a little bit on the starting line once the car started to move?
I think it has a lot better 60 ft. in it by managing the suspension movement at the hit better twocents IHThs luck
As far as suspension upgrades, is this a drag only car or street and strip?
If race only do it once, not twice or more tsk work shruggy
Cal Tracs where made to get around the rules in NHRA stock racing, their are better options out there, a lot better up work scope
I really like my old street and strip Duster with coil overs and ladder bars on , that rascal would hook up in a mud puddle during a rain storm whistling
AKA aside, those parts really work well, especially after switching the rear shocks from single adjustable to double adjustable up scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: Cab_Burge] #2837673
10/26/20 05:58 PM
10/26/20 05:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,296
Chicago, IL
TonyS451 Offline
master
TonyS451  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,296
Chicago, IL
Congrats on the new best. That must have been the happiest day of your life to pick up that much just from a converter swap!


2 kids and a dog
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: TonyS451] #2837713
10/26/20 07:13 PM
10/26/20 07:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
JACK1440 Offline OP
mopar
JACK1440  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
Thanks Guys. It’s a track car, no street. The front has d/a Vikings. I’m now 6 clicks from full loose. I had them tighter but the car was hoping off the ground.

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: TonyS451] #2837718
10/26/20 07:21 PM
10/26/20 07:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
Congrats. Plenty left in it. My bet is 9.1x. Front shocks are too loose in rebound. Don’t know what you have for rear shocks. If they’re not decent doubles I’d start there before I did anything. If they are, tighten them up. Leaf spring needs a lot of travel, 7”if they’re still at the factory angle or they can top out. If they’re vertical, 6” will work. Can always modify the rear suspension later and reuse the shocks if the leafs won’t cut it.
Doug

Last edited by dvw; 10/26/20 07:25 PM.
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837724
10/26/20 07:49 PM
10/26/20 07:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,012
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,012
United Socialist States of Ame...
Congrats! What's the combo and what did you change out the converter to?


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: tboomer] #2837772
10/26/20 09:30 PM
10/26/20 09:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
JACK1440 Offline OP
mopar
JACK1440  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
Thanks Doug. The fronts I have the rebound set in the middle as a starting point. The rear has old worn out shocks.

The combo is 572 Bill Mitchell block, -1 indys w/ 2.25 intakes. Big comp roller. The old converter was an 8 inch but it wouldn’t hold the motor. There was no fallback. The new converter is 9 1/2” 5600 stall

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837781
10/26/20 09:47 PM
10/26/20 09:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,012
United Socialist States of Ame...
T
tboomer Online work
Too Many Posts
tboomer  Online Work
Too Many Posts
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 26,012
United Socialist States of Ame...
Thanks! Sounds like a pretty stout combo! up


Need your rear end checked out? Contact Grizzly!!
Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837805
10/26/20 10:41 PM
10/26/20 10:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,882
MI, usa
Originally Posted by JACK1440
Thanks Doug. The fronts I have the rebound set in the middle as a starting point. The rear has old worn out shocks.
The new converter is 9 1/2” 5600 stall



Once sorted out you’ may find the converter needs to be even looser. We’ve tried as loose as 9.5” at 6300. Current is 6000. Both were quicker than my earlier converters. They were 9.5@5700.
Doug

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837832
10/27/20 12:48 AM
10/27/20 12:48 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,202
aZLiViN
J
J_BODY Offline
I Live Here
J_BODY  Offline
I Live Here
J

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 13,202
aZLiViN
Get that 60 down and there’s at least some teens in there! Nice hit on SS springs!

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837900
10/27/20 09:48 AM
10/27/20 09:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,078
Mo.
racerx Offline
master
racerx  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,078
Mo.
curios if you leave on a trans break or a foot break? That's a good 60' for SS Springs.

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: racerx] #2837902
10/27/20 09:57 AM
10/27/20 09:57 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
JACK1440 Offline OP
mopar
JACK1440  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
I leave on a brake with a 3800 chip. The stall is a 5600. The car has been a 1.34 with the SS springs at it's best and hooked hard but, that was the old motor (much less HP / Torque) then this combo.

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837909
10/27/20 10:16 AM
10/27/20 10:16 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,078
Mo.
racerx Offline
master
racerx  Offline
master

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,078
Mo.
Well i think thats still pretty good for a SS stock spring work i'v been a best of 1.42 on a break .now you got me thinking what's peoples best on SS springs?

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837913
10/27/20 10:26 AM
10/27/20 10:26 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
O
one bad fish Offline
pro stock
one bad fish  Offline
pro stock
O

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
Originally Posted by JACK1440
Thanks Doug. The fronts I have the rebound set in the middle as a starting point. The rear has old worn out shocks.

The combo is 572 Bill Mitchell block, -1 indys w/ 2.25 intakes. Big comp roller. The old converter was an 8 inch but it wouldn’t hold the motor. There was no fallback. The new converter is 9 1/2” 5600 stall

put caltracs with good shocks you will be fine

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: one bad fish] #2837917
10/27/20 10:36 AM
10/27/20 10:36 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
O
one bad fish Offline
pro stock
one bad fish  Offline
pro stock
O

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
[Linked Image]

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: racerx] #2837930
10/27/20 11:04 AM
10/27/20 11:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
JACK1440 Offline OP
mopar
JACK1440  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
That sounds like a new discussion. I can say mine was 1.34 with a 9.84 pass on the 500" just before the crank shaft broke.

Thanks Bad Fish

Re: New Best @ Cecil [Re: JACK1440] #2837931
10/27/20 11:07 AM
10/27/20 11:07 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
O
one bad fish Offline
pro stock
one bad fish  Offline
pro stock
O

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,534
bronx n.y
Originally Posted by JACK1440
That sounds like a new discussion. I can say mine was 1.34 with a 9.84 pass on the 500" just before the crank shaft broke.

Thanks Bad Fish
welcome 127 on a footbrake

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1