MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
#28337
07/14/06 06:39 PM
07/14/06 06:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Just got home. Dave has all the photo's he took over on the shops digital camera, but I got a CD from SuperFlow of all the pics they took, and I'll post some of them in a semi chronoligical order, to kind of give a feel for how the contest went and was run.
On a sidenote, I need someone to tell me how I can capture what is on my computer screen and post it as an attachment so I can capture the wyndyn dyno info and post it easily. I just forget what buttons to hit in Windows to do it....
Anyhow, first thing we did when we arrived Monday around noon was to uncrate the engine, and install it on a SF902 docking cart. All 6 motors by the end of the day Monday were on carts and ready to run. Once they were all carted, we dressed them up temporarily with carbs, headers and air cleaners, and moved them out next to the test cell location for magazine photo's. Here is pic of that event.....
Left to right.... Tom from R&S, Me, Mike Stark from CFM, Eric Shelton, Ken Lazerri from INDY, and Dennis Maurer.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28339
07/14/06 06:42 PM
07/14/06 06:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
I need someone to tell me how I can capture what is on my computer screen and post it as an attachment so I can capture the wyndyn dyno info and post it easily. I just forget what buttons to hit in Windows to do it...
Try ALT + Print Screen
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: BradH]
#28340
07/14/06 07:04 PM
07/14/06 07:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
After the photo BS was over, we went upstairs to the conferrence room for a 1 hourish meeting. First the SF guys got up and told us how they would be operating the testing etc. Then the mP guys took opur questions and had to deal with the MSRP debacle etc.
The big items that came up in the meeting were, what happens if the engine stalls during it's mandatory 6 minutes of idling? It was decided their would be a hefty points penatlty for a motor that stalled, and it would have to eventually make 6 full minutes.
Russ Flagle wanted the 20 minute tuning period changed to 30 minutes becasue 20 was not enough to do much, including lash the valves which several competitors including ICH needed to do, due to the fact their engines had been apart after their dyno time back home.
And then we argued about the MSRP pricing for the rest of the time.... 5 of the 6 competitors were under the asumption that the cost of the MP supplied parts (heads, block, valve covers and crank) were NOT part of the MSRP total price. We believed this for several reasons but the biggest one was a LIST Mp emailed us detailing ALL the parts to be tabulated in the overall MSRP, and thsoe items were NOT on the list. Hence why 5 of the 6 competitors used very expensive aluminum heads, and several of us including myself and the winner took the more expensive wide MP valve covers becasue we did not think it would count against us.
In the end there was NO budging MP on the parts cost even though anyone with half a brain and could read all the emails we had printed out could se that the MP parts costs should not have been included but.... it's their game. They had to give us SOMETHING in exchange for their mishandling of the MSRP., so they did give us the 30 minute tuning period.
Also one other thing I brought up was about how would we do the power pulls, would it be 3 back to back to back, just like E'masters, with no time in between? (which is really hard on motors) And they were flexible here and debated overnight and agreed to give us 2 up to 2 minutes of idle cool down between power pulls if we wanted.
Also we talked alot about the enginemasters shortcomings because several of the SuperFlow dyno operators participated in the early Emasters contests and they knew what a disaster it was, and how badly Parkhurst ran them. And the one dyno operator even brought up the moparts fried starter wire before we could even mention it. And so it was determined that if something happened externally to a motor that was either Superflow's fault or like a plug wire melting on a header tube or a small leak, or in ich's case a freeze plug flying out of their Hemi in a previous challenge, etc. as long as it was EXTERNAL, we could fix it and keep making pulls without penalty. If their was an internal failure, bent pushrod etc, the motor was done, no repairs. Basically they wanted to se our motors run, and not have problems, and not scatter all over the floor, and they would make concessions as we went along to help us.
So that was the big stuff that came out of the Monday afternoon meeting.... it was clearly obvious other than arguing about the MSRp, that the MP tech guys were not out to screw us, they were going to be pretty leniant and help us as much as they could to have a good fair fun contest. There was not going to be any scenes like Scott Parkhurst yelling at DRAM about asking for too much when the starter wire fried. LOL This was a much more laid back easy going contest. I don't think you could have a stodgy uptight contest with Harold Bettes running the Superflow show, that guy is a bundle of energy and quite the prankster.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28341
07/14/06 07:17 PM
07/14/06 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
So after the meeting, Harold gave us a tour of the entire SF complex, here he is with one of the first ten SF benches ever built back in 1973, it sits in the lobby, along with the first dyno console they made. After the tour was over we headed downtown to some upscale restaurant, where MP paid the $1000+ bill. Basically it was all the contestants, the MP engineers and about 6 or 7 of the Superflow brass. And at this point I should mention we were definitely taken care of all week with food. Every day their was breakfast foods brought in, lunch and dinner provided. We went through I think 7 Pizza's on Wednesday and 3 huge hoagie paltters on Tuesday for lunch. There was no shoortage of food or beverage the whole week. And staying along this theme, Dave and I were both blown away with ALL the people from SuperFlow's hospitality. There is something like 50 employees at this facility and I bet at least 30 of them introduced themselves over the 3 days and offered any help we needed tool wise etc. Harold spent half an hour with me on Tuesday AM in his office trying to come up with a calculation to convert vapor pressure into grains of water for me to do some thinking about my carb jetting. Evryone from the forklift operator to the receptionist could not have been nicer or more helpfull. I would have never in a million years expected to be treated so well by so many strangers, especially after hearing about how other engine contest are handled by the host facility. But I can definitely say without a doubt all the people at SF are TOP NOTCH in my book. NONE of the competiors had a single bad thing to say about anyone or anything that happened with the SF staff over three LONG days.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28348
07/14/06 07:36 PM
07/14/06 07:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Speaking of motors in waiting.... here is Mike Stark's 423" Large Port Commando motor. He had a 1050 carb, on a Super Victor, Flat Tappet, 13.3ish to one., reverse cooling etc. Very clean motor, and he is nice guy. We spent most of the weekend with Mike and Mikey from ProMax, we kept borrowing tools from him and he borrowed some header bolts from us. There was a lot of comraderie and give and take between all competitiors.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28350
07/14/06 07:46 PM
07/14/06 07:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
ANDYF: I believe Eric Shelton and us may do a combined effort in 2007, we discussed it some on Thursday, Eric approached Dave about what he thought about combining efforts next year and we said we would be interested in doing something. I'm guessing it is going to be a BB Wedge contest, MP could not tell us for sure, but said they are doing another one.
I assume eventually Mopar Muscle and Royal pruple will do a SB contest, so I'll give that one a "maybe". We'll see. I had a very fun time AT the contest, it was the month and half building up to it that sucked.
Here is Eric's 439 Large Commando motor. One thing I will say is, his 950 Proform out of the box carb is THE MOST IMPRESSIVE out of box carburetor I have ever seen. He tried all kinds of changes in air bleeds/jets PV's etc back in GA and this thing was dead on out of box, so that is where he returned it to, and his AF on dyno at contest just was deadly consistent across the pulls. I AM BUYING ONE this week.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28353
07/14/06 07:57 PM
07/14/06 07:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
I was wrong in my other post about ICH having a King Demon, they threw me off with the milled 4500/4150 adpapter they had on this thing, but it was a 4150 Demon.
They had a ton of valvetrain problems on dyno the week before the contest, they actually temporarily junked the block so the one they used in the contest is another block they had on shelf. They were breaking the intake rocker stands of the heads since they CNC'd them so far, and the boss had little support, so they came up with a nice looking stud girdle on July 4 to fix it. Dave took a bunch of close up pics of it, I'll post sometime. This was first time I ever really talked much to Ken and Russ and hung out with them, they're different than I expected, we borrowed their extra long MSD trigger wire to run our motor. We're going to do some business with Russ on a couple fronts in the future. I think Dave's highlight of the weekend was when Russ walked up to us on Thursday night at the MP Block Party while we were in the food line and asked us for a business card LOL. Anyhow here's their 440.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: sixpackgut]
#28355
07/14/06 08:11 PM
07/14/06 08:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
INDY's motor and R&S were ran on Dyno cell #2 and #1 respectively on Tuesday Morning. Superflow has 4 Dyno test cells side by side. The guys at SF were worried about people being in the cell next to a motor during a pull so we had to do some jockeying, to make sure no one was in the opposite cell working when pulls were happening.
Here is the winning motor out of MN, from R&S racing. Like I said in my other post it is aprox 15:1, is a 4" crank, 4.180ish bore, has custom pistons with vertical gas ports, and a "light ring pack", 1000 HP carb, Super Victor, heads were done by another shop in MN. We took pics of the motor during tear down, there was no voodoo. It was just a well built solid combo. The heads have 52 cc chambers, the ports looked nice, but nothing outrageous size wise on the intake side. He just had regular old Fel Pro 1213 intake gaskets on it. The exhaust ports were BIG. Probably one of biggest I have ever seen in a SB mopar head, bigger than anything I've done, I may have done 1 or two sets of W5's with Ex ports similar in size. So they were very big and nice shape, flat floor, D shaped. And like I said in other post cam was very unusual, I'll be checking out exact specs on that on Monday from Comp. I've never even read a magazine article anywhere with specs like that cam has, such low duration (238 intake) and yet alot of lobe lift (.420ish)and a wide LSA. Just had a set of 1.6 Crane gold rockers on it, actually had a stock 340 oil pan, and set of 1 7/8 TTI W2 headers. 285 cranking PSI.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28363
07/14/06 08:51 PM
07/14/06 08:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Here's Dave crunching various RPM/Vacuum #'s during warm up trying to figure out what RPM/Vac reading would give us the best score. He calculated 910 RPM/6.0 was where we would score best so I went in and tryed to set the idle as clse to his goal as possible. In the end after 5 minutes of idle and then 1 minute of recorded idle, we had 930 RPM average and -5.9 vacuum, so I set it about as close as I could to his target.
if you look real close you can see alot of data on the screen including the corrected DA on the lower right corner, it reads, DA, VP, baro, humidity, and inlet temp in that order starting from bottom up. Harold welded in a O2 bung in our headers on Tuesday night so we could run the LM1.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28364
07/14/06 08:52 PM
07/14/06 08:52 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Quote:
Pic of test cell #2, which was operated by John Seamon from SF's North Carolina office, and officiated by Jim S. (in the blue shirt) From MP. The guy in the black shirt is John Donato, the other MP Engineer who was in charge of tech on cell 1. This is the cell we used, INDY ran on and Shelton. The other 3 ran in cell 1. These were 2 brand new never ran SF902's that were installed on Monday. Turns out John is originally from Williamsport, PA (about 45 minutes Northeast of us) and is the nephew of Gary Hetler. We BS'd about Kent Ritters dyno "cell" jokingly on Thursday at the MP Party. Kent's Brother was the one who introduced and recommended John to Harold at SF to give him his job. It's a small small world.
Ryan, I know John from work, nice guy. Well it looks like you had some fun after ALL the work you went through. Are you abile to post the out come of all of the engines or is that a no-no as of yet
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: Quicksilver440]
#28372
07/14/06 09:37 PM
07/14/06 09:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136 Melbourne , Australia
LA360
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,136
Melbourne , Australia
|
Quote:
Quote:
rvoyles: the contest heavily factored in cost of the engines as well as vacuum and idle RPM, hence why he tried a Thermoquad (cheap) and we ran $86 headers on a $16,000 engine LOL
I get it now...
Should I feel bad that the guy with the lowest numbers on that board ported my heads?
I think those little pipes would have something to do with it AL...
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28391
07/15/06 09:51 PM
07/15/06 09:51 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,492 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,492
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
great post!! and...it sounds like it was a good time, despite all the BS up to that point. i am confused about one thing though....you were mentioning the odd cam specs of the one entry... ("like I said in other post cam was very unusual, I'll be checking out exact specs on that on Monday from Comp. I've never even read a magazine article anywhere with specs like that cam has, such low duration (238 intake) and yet alot of lobe lift (.420ish)and a wide LSA") ......but i was under the impression the cam had to be an "off the shelf" item. sooo.....which page of the Comp catalog is that cam on??
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28392
07/15/06 11:10 PM
07/15/06 11:10 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
very informative thread. it looks like the folks at R&S had most everyone covered by nearly 100 Horsepower. do they do their own head porting? glad you were treated so well and had no fried wires.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28394
07/16/06 03:27 AM
07/16/06 03:27 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Eric working on his motor. When the big man puts his glasses on, you know he is getting serious In all seriousness, he is a blast to hang out with.
I recently sent some email to Eric asking about his 99 hemis. He was very informative and answered all my mails.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#28395
07/16/06 12:40 PM
07/16/06 12:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Quote:
great post!!
and...it sounds like it was a good time, despite all the BS up to that point.
i am confused about one thing though....you were mentioning the odd cam specs of the one entry... ("like I said in other post cam was very unusual, I'll be checking out exact specs on that on Monday from Comp. I've never even read a magazine article anywhere with specs like that cam has, such low duration (238 intake) and yet alot of lobe lift (.420ish)and a wide LSA") ......but i was under the impression the cam had to be an "off the shelf" item.
sooo.....which page of the Comp catalog is that cam on??
Yeah..... you're going to get a call about that one on Monday. I'd like you to have a little chat with Chris May's about it. But no it's not in the "current" Comp Cams catalog.
DRAM they did'nt port their own heads, he told me who did them but it was not anyone I had ever heard of, it was just some small shop near them in MN. I got to see them during tear down, and we have some pics on the shops dig camera. They were nicely done, but nothing exotic. We were not allowed epoxy or welding etc. There was not any 1 component that made their power so much higher than everyone else, it was just a combo of everything.
They had 440 inches, as did most of us, but not all (Stark & Maurer built less)
They had 15:1, where most of us had alot less compression, We were about 12.1, Shelton 11.9, Stark 13.3. We all kind of stayed more in tune with "street motor" theme as far as compression.I know we could have got away with more in CO, but these motors now have to spend the rest of their life on the East coast at 1000-2000 feet DA, and we all took that into account. I really did'nt want to build a 15:1 motor that needs to run on $15 a gallon gas, if it's not in high elevation.
Their cam was "questionable" as far as legality of being an off the shelf grind
They had 1000 HP carb, one of the 2 biggest in the contest.
They had a Super Victor intake which obviously is a good piece.
The heads had oversize valves which we did'nt do because it was supposed to count against us cost wise, but that rule got changed the Monday night of the contest. I had stayed with the 3/8" MP 2.02/1.60 3/8 valves, used a cheap Comp roller spring, and moly retainers because of cost, they had oversizd 11/32's with Ti retainers etc. And did not get penalized cost wise due to the last minute rule change. So they had good heads...
They used 1 7/8 TTI headers, which would be the biggest ones used in the contest.
They had ~35 dyno pulls on it in MN, by far more tuning time than anyone else. We had 6 pulls in PA having issues getting on the dyno, and then having an adjuster back off and having to drive back to shop for backup rocker, Stark had about 1 pull as their dyno servo or something was messed up, INDY busted their intake rocker stud mounts due to aggressive porting, and had limited pulls due to fact they had to replace the block and make a stud girdle, and Shelton had bad valve seats and vacuum leaks and got limited tuning done.
They had 1 of only 2 roller cams
They had the highest overall MSRP cost even with the lack of cyl head parts included by a wide margin.
It all added up to the biggest power #'s, it was'nt one specific thing, just like in any engine it was the overall combo.
They pushed the limits of rules/cost/parts/and fuel farther than anybody and got away with it and won. They were by FAR and away the most prepared, and generally the best prepared is going to win. The lack of build time I think for them was helped out by the fact they were the only ones to subcontract out their head work. Everyone else did theirs in house, and with 30-50 hours+ eaten up right there.... that hurts. That would be my BIGGEST complaint about the whole contest, other than the constantly changing rules, it was just the overall lack of time from when we finally got our parts to when the motor had to be there. This was'nt like Enginemasters where you have half a year to work on stuff, this was a thrash.....
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: Jesse_Lackman]
#28397
07/16/06 04:30 PM
07/16/06 04:30 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Ryan, would the R&S motor maybe be one of the fastest non "W" motor that you made a topic last month. What should that motor run in a 3,000 pound A-body?
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
#28398
07/16/06 05:07 PM
07/16/06 05:07 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,752 detroit area
moderncylinder
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,752
detroit area
|
ryan,, it looks like the air/fuel was low around peak torque which isnt that bad,, but the bsfc numbers look lean. might be that header that is screwing you up more than the jetting.
im wondering who would pay 16k for a 650hp motor....
why wouldnt you think that the supplied parts wouldnt be included in the msrp,, was mopar goingto give those parts to anyone trying to replicate that engine?
looks to me like the guy who best understands the way an internal engine functions could win,, and probably won. if you want more of a no-brainer,, real world engine shootout,, you need a compression rule.
jeff
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: moderncylinder]
#28400
07/17/06 06:59 PM
07/17/06 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Quote:
ryan,, it looks like the air/fuel was low around peak torque which isnt that bad,, but the bsfc numbers look lean. might be that header that is screwing you up more than the jetting.
im wondering who would pay 16k for a 650hp motor....
why wouldnt you think that the supplied parts wouldnt be included in the msrp,, was mopar goingto give those parts to anyone trying to replicate that engine?
looks to me like the guy who best understands the way an internal engine functions could win,, and probably won. if you want more of a no-brainer,, real world engine shootout,, you need a compression rule.
jeff
I've never seen anyone try to run an $86 1 5/8" el cheapo street header on an engine like this before (big inch). It was an experiment, I would like to dyno it again and try some misc race headers and carbs. But that being said I left the exhaust port basically "unported" because I was using the small header inlet. My normal Lg commando Ex port is a large Oval with a drastically raised roof. Even being in stock small square shape it still overhangs the headeders especially on the end cylinders. ie. the headers on 1/7 2/8 are smaller than the stock Ex ports. I asked one of the engineers what their thinking behind these Ex port shapes was and he had no good answer. The roof of the port and the top of the header port are about even, so all I could do was lower the floor some, I could'nt widen it any. It's about 40 cfm off of a "good" Lg Commando Ex port.
Who would pay $16K for a 650 HP motor? Alot of people. Every engine we build today is between $12-$18K intake to pan with all new parts. Most are 550-650 Street/Strip engines. That's just what they cost to build. The big W series stuff oes'nt really cost any more to build today than one of these W5/Lg Commando/INDY head motors. Maybe another $1K with water lines, trick intake work and custom pistons but... What's another grand when you're already spending 15.
Why did'nt we think the supplied MP parts would be included? Because we all (most competitors) specifically asked that question, and we got and email back with a list of all MSRP parts that would be included in the final tally and none of the MP supplied parts were listed on that list. It was after that list came out in our email, that we chose our cyl heads. If I had known the truth I would have used LA replacement iron heads and chevy rockers. Then June 30 we get the final MSRP list emailed to us to be filled out and faxed back and the MP parts were on it..... to say some of us were a bit unhappy would be an understatement. We spent about and hour arguing with the MP guys on Monday about it and they said they'd think about it overnight and give a ruling on Tuesday. In the end they gave us an extra 10 minutes of tune time for the "misunderstanding" on MSRP. I don't know how we all could have asked a VERY specific question, and gotten a VERY specific answer back and yet in the end have the answer be wrong. But then again it's MP.... And they had all of our questions asked/answered through an intermediary (the JR Thompson Co. who handles their advertising) So... I should have know things would get screwed up.
I think they are going to either do a compression rule, or lower the fuel to 93 next year. I'd liek to see a 12.5:1 limit myself and stay with the VP 100 fuel. They realize they need to do SOMETHING to stop the ultra high compression stuff, his motor was killer but as Jon Clark said to a couple of us competitors in the back room, "it was'nt really in the spirit of what MP wanted to see built" They want REAL street motors, just like I think Enginemasters does and yet every year pure dyno contest engines show up and win. I have no qualms about mine being streetable, I would like to put it in my car and run it around here on 94 Sunoco with a couple cooling lines added. The cam is not outrageous, or a spring killer, it has 8-8.5" of vacuum out here and idles as low as 605 with no load, 750 with load. It idled for 6 minutes straight and did'nt load up the plugs before the power pulls... Good TQ curve, I think would be nice street motor.
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28401
07/18/06 11:39 AM
07/18/06 11:39 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I think Dave's highlight of the weekend was when Russ walked up to us on Thursday night at the MP Block Party while we were in the food line and asked us for a business card LOL. Anyhow here's their 440.
you mean he didn't call you an idiot and degrade you because you didn't buy a set of his heads for the contest engine ???
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: JohnRR]
#28402
07/18/06 06:27 PM
07/18/06 06:27 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864 IN
Irun5snd8th
master
|
master
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,864
IN
|
Well I can assure you from what I see on this board that regardless of who won between Ryan and Indy. I would go to Ryan in a heartbeat. Russ and his boys are a real piece of work. When guys you sponsor talk bad about you; you need to work on your business. When I build more power I am gonna call Ryan for a set of W5's or something similar. Nice job Ryan.
AFCO, Rons Fuel Injection sponsored Dodge Challenger
Mention Street Lethal Motorsports
|
|
|
Re: MP Engine Contest Pics and Dyno Sheets
[Re: RyanJ]
#28403
07/18/06 06:35 PM
07/18/06 06:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 350 central IL
myduster360
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 350
central IL
|
here's the lobes he's probably using.
Dave
1972 Swinger 3.6L Pentastar Diablo CMR tuner
|
|
|
|
|