Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2775864
05/18/20 05:32 PM
05/18/20 05:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
You'd spend a good chunk of cash buying and reworking some clapped out old 286 heads to get them even be close in flow to some mildly reworked 088 BBC heads.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2775870
05/18/20 05:43 PM
05/18/20 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
If they’re allowed to run rectangle port heads, there are plenty of good ones to pick from.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2775907
05/18/20 07:10 PM
05/18/20 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,071 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,071
Oregon
|
If I could be around 700 I would be happy. We can run a vac pump also to help squeeze the most out of it as possible. Rules state the engine must match the truck. I already have the chassis done so I’m stuck with Mopar powered which I would prefer anyways. I could step up to the pro stock class that allows aluminum heads and 485ci. My buddy runs a ford in that class with kaase p51s that makes 950 and is getting the new sr71s next year. They really limit the Mopar heads in that class as well. No b1s. So victors or indys would be the better choices for it. If your buddy is making 950 then you would have your work cut out for you to match that with a 485 inch Mopar. You would need an aftermarket block (good luck there) as well as a really good set of Indy heads. Maybe the full on -1 heads or step up to the 572 heads. I'm not positive which would be the best way to go to hit 950 hp at 485 cubes but you can figure that out in a few phone calls. It wouldn't be a cheap engine that is for sure. Probably start at $20,000 and go up from there. Dry sump, belt drive, big cam, big springs, super high quality valve train, etc.
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: AndyF]
#2775908
05/18/20 07:10 PM
05/18/20 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,197 PA.
pittsburghracer
"Little"John
|
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,197
PA.
|
Any good head porter that you pick can easily get 320 plus cfm out of a W2 Head with 2.08 valves. Put a big enough cam in it to use that cfm with a nicely ported W2 Victor intake and go have some fun.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.42@138.27
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2775924
05/18/20 07:54 PM
05/18/20 07:54 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,284
Bend,OR USA
|
The 485 is in a different class so I won’t have to worry about it. Nope all trucks need to weigh 6,200 with the driver in it. No more No more or no less?
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2775968
05/18/20 09:19 PM
05/18/20 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,668 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
Mr. Helpful
|
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,668
Fulton County, PA
|
So they need to weigh the same, as close to 6200 as possible. The big block is heavier where you want the weight. There's a cubic inch penalty of 40 inches with a small block and no breaks or advantage for running one.
Either I'm missing something or the question is why would you even consider a small block when the heaviest 472 big block you can find sounds like the best combo?
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: Moparpuller]
#2776074
05/19/20 09:45 AM
05/19/20 09:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Either I'm missing something or the question is why would you even consider a small block when the heaviest 472 big block you can find sounds like the best combo?
The weight of the motor doesn’t really matter. If you are running a lighter motor, it just allows you to add more weight to the weight bar at the very front of the truck. You’re still working within the 6200lb max limit. As for any advantage for the SB....... Most of the rigs need wheel speed, so they turn a lot of rpm. The OP is looking for 8000-8500 capability. At those kinds of rpm, I think a 434 built around a Ritter block would have better reliability than a 472 built around a stock 400 block.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Max wedge big block vs w2 small block
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2776084
05/19/20 10:29 AM
05/19/20 10:29 AM
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 24 Fort Madison iowa
Moparpuller
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 24
Fort Madison iowa
|
Correct. Even tho the big block is heavier on the front it still isn’t as far forward as we would like to have it. Getting the weight concentrated as far forward as possible helps use the mechanical advantage. Wheel speed is very important in truck pulling. Normally around 33-34mph is how fast the tires turn and the actual truck will do 27-30 pulling the sled with the slippage from the tires. Are max effort w2s capable of supporting 434 inches at 8,500?
Last edited by Moparpuller; 05/19/20 10:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
|