110 vs 93 octane
#2736281
01/24/20 08:15 PM
01/24/20 08:15 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,079 Michigan
A727Tflite
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,079
Michigan
|
Has anyone done any testing, on track or dyno comparing power made using 93 versus 110.
Baseline motor is a hemi, aluminum head, 11.5-1 ratio, cranking compression 180, 2 x 4 inline manifold.
So to be clear, if this engine made x power would you expect it to make more or less on 93 versus the 110 used on the dyno.
BSFC numbers climbed as the engine speed increased, EGT was less than 1100 at 6500.
It didn’t like more than 32 degrees either.
Not sure if the fuel is part of the problem, or maybe just the high speed bleeds, jetting or combination of all. Jetting was lower than what was called for and while it helped by leaning it out it seemed way too fat for what it was running.
Last edited by Transman; 01/24/20 08:16 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: A727Tflite]
#2736312
01/24/20 09:55 PM
01/24/20 09:55 PM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 713 Lake Villa Il
INTMD8
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 713
Lake Villa Il
|
Most of my experience is with calibrating efi cars rather than gen2 Hemi's specifically. That being said I'll throw in my .02.
On naturally aspirated combinations I start with a relatively conservative timing curve and first dial in target wot air fuel ratio.
Once that is done I'll put a few more degrees in and see if power increases (along with watching knock sensor output on the stuff I'm working with).
As long as it isn't getting knock I'll continue to add a degree at a time as long as power is increasing, noting if this is making the same result throughout the rpm range or varying at different rpm ranges.
I've at times been surprised by how much timing something wants to make max power and also, how little an engine required to make max power.
As far as octane playing into this is concerned, I've only seen higher octane add power if as I was increasing timing and seeing power gains I ran into excessive knock/knock sensor output before I reached a -peak- as far as total timing and horsepower is concerned.
I feel many say "race fuel has a slower burn rate". Truth is many factors influence burn rate but most gasolines burn rate is very similar. If anything, some race fuel is tailored to a faster burn rate as there simply isn't enough time for complete combustion at 9000+++ rpm as there is at 5000 rpm.
So, moving on, look at the energy value of the fuel, or BTU's per lb. Regular pump fuel is slightly higher BTU/lb than most race fuel so if the added octane isn't needed for your combination you will generally get slightly less output from using it.
Exception is E85 which has a much lower energy value but also a much lower stoich value which more than compensates for it. (as in you are burning much more of it)
Your engine at 11.5-1, hemi, aluminum head. I would be surprised if you were leaving much on the table with pump 93. I wouldn't expect it to like more than 32-33deg no matter what fuel.
That being said, only way to know is to test it. Run it back to back at the track or dyno. I would probably try something like 260 GT, 100 octane oxygenated if you are willing to spend the money on race fuel, rather than 110, IMO.
Last edited by INTMD8; 01/24/20 09:56 PM.
69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: Fig]
#2736623
01/25/20 08:06 PM
01/25/20 08:06 PM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 713 Lake Villa Il
INTMD8
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 713
Lake Villa Il
|
Have to disagree a bit. Octane is resistance to pre/ignition or auto detonation before spark due to heat, not burn speed once ignited. Or/also ability to achieve smooth controlled combustion after spark event. If you’re on the edge you can see this on a dyno with a stick car as it goes from a bit of a jagged curve to much smoother after introducing higher octane fuel. Always open to other ideas so if someone can provide any links to info supporting octane vs burn rate I would like to read it
69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: INTMD8]
#2736638
01/25/20 08:50 PM
01/25/20 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 566 Texas
RustyM
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 566
Texas
|
MD8: I think you will find this article both interesting and helpful. I actually called Vp to talk about it and, can say i "think" i understand better than i did. Yes, burn rates and vaporization matter and often the ingredients used to raise octane also reduce burn rates /hurt vaporization and thus, cures knocking etc but also makes less power in some applications. By the same token, they can blend fuels to take high compressions but burn very fast for engines with really high rpm , which is needed because there is so little time at 10k (and up) to burn fuel. Vp amazed me in explaining what all they can do with fuel blending. Part of the article your likely most interested in is a few paragraphs down. Hope this helps a little . Tuning is a blast! Rusty https://dsportmag.com/the-tech/fuel-101-race-gas-octane-and-alternative-fuels-explained/
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: hemienvy]
#2736758
01/26/20 12:42 PM
01/26/20 12:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,708 central il.
second 70
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,708
central il.
|
Second 70, What are your cam specs? Crane solid roller 112 lobe separation 14 vacuum @ 1100 idle Low rpm motor Lol! Mike
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2736972
01/27/20 05:48 AM
01/27/20 05:48 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,285 West Coast, USA
jbc426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,285
West Coast, USA
|
I'm running 10.2 to 1 that cranks 200 psi on both my Magnum and stroked 493" RB motors. I'm able to run full advance on both motors burning the 91 octane ethanol additive fuel we get he in California with zero detonation. My RB is actually locked out at 35*, and it never even kicks back on start-up.
While the 101 octane street legal race gas that's available at the pump nearby smells way better when burned, it's supposed to make less power than the 91 octane pump gas. The difference is so subtle that I can't feel it in either car.
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's 1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: jbc426]
#2737011
01/27/20 10:52 AM
01/27/20 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 148 Albert Lea, MN
GTX5877
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 148
Albert Lea, MN
|
As reputed engine builder and tuner, John Lingenfelter, once said
Running an engine on the edge of detonation, will always make more power!
1967 Dart GTS 426 Gen III Hemi 1968 Hemi Cuda 572 SS/AH Clone 1988 Chrysler LeBaron Coupe S/S 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 4dr SLT lowered 2012 Ram 1500 2wd Lowered 1970-1/2 Camaro Z-28 1974 VW Karman-Ghia
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: GTX5877]
#2737259
01/27/20 09:34 PM
01/27/20 09:34 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,204 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,204
Bend,OR USA
|
As reputed engine builder and tuner, John Lingenfelter, once said
Running an engine on the edge of detonation, will always make more power! How many real car people, not real hard core racers, can tell the difference between the edge of and in detonation ? A hot humid day can take a N/A carbureted motor on the edge of detonation deep enough into detonation so bad that you can hear it pinging Way better to be on the safe side on the street, IMO
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 01/27/20 09:35 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2737354
01/28/20 09:31 AM
01/28/20 09:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Not scientific at all, but mine slowed down almost a tenth and 1 mph when I put some 110 in the tank after running low on pump 93. 11:1 572" hemi at 34° running mid 9s at 140 mph. I didn't adjust anything for the fuel change b/c it's a dedicated pump gas motor.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: 110 vs 93 octane
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#2737416
01/28/20 01:04 PM
01/28/20 01:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,274 fredericksburg,va
cudaman1969
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,274
fredericksburg,va
|
Not scientific at all, but mine slowed down almost a tenth and 1 mph when I put some 110 in the tank after running low on pump 93. 11:1 572" hemi at 34° running mid 9s at 140 mph. I didn't adjust anything for the fuel change b/c it's a dedicated pump gas motor. Good to know, I’ll be close to that
|
|
|
|
|