Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530052
08/01/18 04:26 PM
08/01/18 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,208 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,208
New York
|
how do I decide which ratio I want
1. what top speed do you expect? 2. with what tire diameter? 3. transmission O/D: Y/N? 4. now you know your axle ratio 5. what 1st gears are possible with your transmission? 6. lower than optimum number (PG): looser converter
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530112
08/01/18 06:05 PM
08/01/18 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
Mr. Helpful
|
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
|
Power, weight, stroke, chassis/suspension type, rear gear, what kind of racing (you want to go fast, consistent, hit the pro tree, etc) quality of track prep you usually see,...
Transmission choice will determine your options and the costs. You can get a variety of gear sets for 3 speeds, even use 2nd gear to start. Glides have fewer choices but they are usually right for many applications. They top out at 1.96 for a decent gear set with 1.80 being popular unless you're making a ton of power and/or real light. Tire size matters but usually just knowing big tire ~32" or small tire ~ 28" will get you close.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: Blucuda413]
#2530179
08/01/18 08:34 PM
08/01/18 08:34 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,684 Wichita
GY3
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,684
Wichita
|
8.67:1 with sticky tires and good prep = 1.54 60 ft.
5.13:1 for no prep street/true street tire action = 1.72 60 ft.
'63 Dodge 330 11.19 @ 121 mph Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs. 10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 383man]
#2530182
08/01/18 08:50 PM
08/01/18 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,184 PA.
pittsburghracer
"Little"John
|
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,184
PA.
|
9.66 using that formula (rear gear x low gear)
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.42@138.27
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530266
08/01/18 11:24 PM
08/01/18 11:24 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
|
Don't forget about the torque multiplication of the torque converter in each gear, especially on the starting line in low gear. I can remember many stick shift modified production cars with very small C.I. motor running 2.98 first gear ratio and 6.17 to 7.17 rear gear ratio for the 1/4 mile a long, long time ago I shoot for the lowest starting line ratio I can run that won't spin the tires on the line You may need to experiment some on your car to find what works best for you at your track Good luck
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#2530275
08/01/18 11:51 PM
08/01/18 11:51 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,837 South Bend
John Brown
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,837
South Bend
|
I can remember many stick shift modified production cars with very small C.I. motor running 2.98 first gear ratio and 6.17 to 7.17 rear gear ratio for the 1/4 mile a long, long time ago.
And don't leave out the fact that many of them had 40 pound or heavier flywheels along with all that gear. Can you say 10 or 11 thousand rpm's in the traps? Can you?
July 19th should be "Drive Like Rockford Day". R.I.P. Jimmie.
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530309
08/02/18 01:33 AM
08/02/18 01:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
Mr. Helpful
|
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
|
Pro tree chassis car, light (2350# loaded), 525 HP, 5.29 with a 3.31 stroke - 4.86 with a 3.60 stroke, 32" tire. I had everything in this car from 1.76 to 2.74. A 2.45 3 speed was quick, but would turn the tire and kill 03-04 reaction time and 60' often enough that I always had to have some in my pocket and then race the finishline based on how it left. 1.76 was a turd. 1.96 with a 4.86 = 9.52 worked nice on most tracks with an aggressive 4 link set up. As quick as the 2.45 but more consistent. 1.87 may have been a good choice but we never tried that.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530315
08/02/18 01:56 AM
08/02/18 01:56 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448 Phoenix, AZ
MoparBilly
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
|
They'll have to pry my low gear set 904 from my cold dead fingers!! 428 small block, small shot of nitrous, 3.89 geared 9", 8" 4800 stall convertor, 29 tall tire, 3100lb street car. I may go up to a 3.73 gear, but not giving up my 2.77 first gear!
"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks"
4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530486
08/02/18 02:13 PM
08/02/18 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
|
Billy has a very good point about SLR, I switch low gear ratio in my old M.W. stocker in 1988 for the NHRA World finals at Pomona in 1988, took out the stock 2.45 low gear ratio and put in the Mopar brand 2.77 low gear (2.45X4.89=11.98) and swapped the third member from the 4.89 ratio to 4.56 which = 12.63 SLR That made the car quicker and faster than it had ran that year If you don't test you don't learn
Last edited by Cab_Burge; 08/02/18 02:14 PM.
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530511
08/02/18 02:58 PM
08/02/18 02:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602 Fulton County, PA
CMcAllister
Mr. Helpful
|
Mr. Helpful
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
|
60' is where the ET is. Stacking gear will make it 60', if it doesn't spin the tire excessively. It's a balancing act. Again, do you want to get up on the tire and go fast, or stick it and do the same thing every time. If you use radials, that's a different situation.
Last edited by CMcAllister; 08/02/18 02:59 PM.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
|
|
|
Re: Starting line ratio ???
[Re: 03heavy]
#2530529
08/02/18 03:47 PM
08/02/18 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036 bean town ....Ca
WHITEDART
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
|
Trying run max effort Learning the Caltrac’s don’t like being hit hard [/quote] well I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that. but I hit mine pretty hard.. as a matter of fact the racepack will see close to 3 G's for the first few feet of the track.. which I think is relatively hard for a stock suspension door car..
Last edited by WHITEDART; 08/02/18 03:49 PM.
In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's 5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
|
|
|
|
|