Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Starting line ratio ??? #2530023
08/01/18 03:17 PM
08/01/18 03:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
0
03heavy Offline OP
member
03heavy  Offline OP
member
0

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
Trying to educate myself on starting line ratio
1st gear x rear axle ratios==slr
What about tire size
And how do I decide which ratio I want ?

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530029
08/01/18 03:36 PM
08/01/18 03:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,839
NW Indiana
F
fbs63 Offline
top fuel
fbs63  Offline
top fuel
F

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,839
NW Indiana
Slr is really power and weight dependent. A big motor in a a light car needs less than a high rpm small block in a heavy car.

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530052
08/01/18 04:26 PM
08/01/18 04:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,208
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,208
New York
how do I decide which ratio I want

1. what top speed do you expect?
2. with what tire diameter?
3. transmission O/D: Y/N?
4. now you know your axle ratio
5. what 1st gears are possible with your transmission?
6. lower than optimum number (PG): looser converter


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530112
08/01/18 06:05 PM
08/01/18 06:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
Power, weight, stroke, chassis/suspension type, rear gear, what kind of racing (you want to go fast, consistent, hit the pro tree, etc) quality of track prep you usually see,...

Transmission choice will determine your options and the costs. You can get a variety of gear sets for 3 speeds, even use 2nd gear to start. Glides have fewer choices but they are usually right for many applications. They top out at 1.96 for a decent gear set with 1.80 being popular unless you're making a ton of power and/or real light. Tire size matters but usually just knowing big tire ~32" or small tire ~ 28" will get you close.


If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530151
08/01/18 07:22 PM
08/01/18 07:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,533
Alexandria, LA
B
Blucuda413 Offline
master
Blucuda413  Offline
master
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,533
Alexandria, LA
Back in the day the desired ratio was 10:1. I'm now at 8.04:1 and could probably go higher. The choices are much greater today in all areas. Sometime it's just trial and error after you listen to all the knowing people and get a starting setup.

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: Blucuda413] #2530179
08/01/18 08:34 PM
08/01/18 08:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,684
Wichita
G
GY3 Offline
master
GY3  Offline
master
G

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,684
Wichita
8.67:1 with sticky tires and good prep = 1.54 60 ft.

5.13:1 for no prep street/true street tire action = 1.72 60 ft.



'63 Dodge 330
11.19 @ 121 mph
Pump gas, n/a, through the mufflers on street tires with 3.54's. 3,600 lbs.
10.01 @ 133mph with a 250 shot of nitrous an a splash of race gas. 1.36 60 ft. 3,700 lbs.

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: GY3] #2530180
08/01/18 08:38 PM
08/01/18 08:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Ok this is easy. You decide by what they tell you hear on Moparts !! grin laugh2 Sorry guys but I could not resist. Ron

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 383man] #2530182
08/01/18 08:50 PM
08/01/18 08:50 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,184
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,184
PA.
9.66 using that formula (rear gear x low gear)


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 383man] #2530260
08/01/18 11:18 PM
08/01/18 11:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,533
Alexandria, LA
B
Blucuda413 Offline
master
Blucuda413  Offline
master
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,533
Alexandria, LA
No 383man, I didn't say all of the people on Moparts were knowing people!!!

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530266
08/01/18 11:24 PM
08/01/18 11:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
Don't forget about the torque multiplication of the torque converter in each gear, especially on the starting line in low gear.
I can remember many stick shift modified production cars with very small C.I. motor running 2.98 first gear ratio and 6.17 to 7.17 rear gear ratio for the 1/4 mile a long, long time ago work
I shoot for the lowest starting line ratio I can run that won't spin the tires on the line up You may need to experiment some on your car to find what works best for you at your track shruggy work
Good luck scope


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: Cab_Burge] #2530275
08/01/18 11:51 PM
08/01/18 11:51 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,837
South Bend
John Brown Offline
top fuel
John Brown  Offline
top fuel

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,837
South Bend
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge

I can remember many stick shift modified production cars with very small C.I. motor running 2.98 first gear ratio and 6.17 to 7.17 rear gear ratio for the 1/4 mile a long, long time ago.



And don't leave out the fact that many of them had 40 pound or heavier flywheels along with all that gear.

Can you say 10 or 11 thousand rpm's in the traps? Can you? no


July 19th should be "Drive Like Rockford Day". R.I.P. Jimmie.
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530276
08/01/18 11:51 PM
08/01/18 11:51 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,847
MI, usa
I run a fair amount of SLR with my 572. 10.535 SLR with 10.5Wx31 (w/tubes). Car weighs 3340 when not weighed down for index. 60ft with no weight 1.25-1.26, with weight and throttle pulled back 1.29-1.30. Consistent with-in .01 through out the day on foot brake and no rev chip.
Doug

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530309
08/02/18 01:33 AM
08/02/18 01:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
Pro tree chassis car, light (2350# loaded), 525 HP, 5.29 with a 3.31 stroke - 4.86 with a 3.60 stroke, 32" tire. I had everything in this car from 1.76 to 2.74. A 2.45 3 speed was quick, but would turn the tire and kill 03-04 reaction time and 60' often enough that I always had to have some in my pocket and then race the finishline based on how it left. 1.76 was a turd. 1.96 with a 4.86 = 9.52 worked nice on most tracks with an aggressive 4 link set up. As quick as the 2.45 but more consistent. 1.87 may have been a good choice but we never tried that.


If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530315
08/02/18 01:56 AM
08/02/18 01:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
M
MoparBilly Offline
master
MoparBilly  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
They'll have to pry my low gear set 904 from my cold dead fingers!!
428 small block, small shot of nitrous, 3.89 geared 9", 8" 4800 stall convertor, 29 tall tire, 3100lb street car. I may go up to a 3.73 gear, but not giving up my 2.77 first gear!

mrgrecpt0003.JPG14311407_10154656045568938_2185780269753095463_o - Copy - Copy.jpg

"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks" 4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530432
08/02/18 12:19 PM
08/02/18 12:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
0
03heavy Offline OP
member
03heavy  Offline OP
member
0

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
Ok
2.45 first and a 4.56 rear axle
Comes out to a 11.17
Plans are to run a 7.0 index which won’t be a issue with the combo
But I also want to maximize the package
Looking to run in the bottom of the 6.60’s and maybe a 50
Kinda looks like will be hitting the tire pretty hard when
Trying run max effort Learning the Caltrac’s don’t like being hit hard


Looks guys I know I’ve been beating this forum to death
Silly questions and want to make sure I say thank you
For taking the time and helping
Especially the guys that have a been there done that
Or are doing it as we speak
Max ET is very important to me as I don’t wanna embarrass myself or my dart

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530486
08/02/18 02:13 PM
08/02/18 02:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
Billy has a very good point about SLR, I switch low gear ratio in my old M.W. stocker in 1988 for the NHRA World finals at Pomona in 1988, took out the stock 2.45 low gear ratio and put in the Mopar brand 2.77 low gear (2.45X4.89=11.98) and swapped the third member from the 4.89 ratio to 4.56 which = 12.63 SLR wrench
That made the car quicker and faster than it had ran that year work shruggy
If you don't test you don't learn up

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 08/02/18 02:14 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530511
08/02/18 02:58 PM
08/02/18 02:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
C
CMcAllister Offline
Mr. Helpful
CMcAllister  Offline
Mr. Helpful
C

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 11,602
Fulton County, PA
60' is where the ET is. Stacking gear will make it 60', if it doesn't spin the tire excessively. It's a balancing act. Again, do you want to get up on the tire and go fast, or stick it and do the same thing every time. If you use radials, that's a different situation.

Last edited by CMcAllister; 08/02/18 02:59 PM.

If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530523
08/02/18 03:33 PM
08/02/18 03:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,081
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Offline
master
A727Tflite  Offline
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,081
Michigan
Cab, how fast did the car run in 1988?

What cam did you use back then ?

Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530529
08/02/18 03:47 PM
08/02/18 03:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
W
WHITEDART Offline
master
WHITEDART  Offline
master
W

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,036
bean town ....Ca
Trying run max effort Learning the Caltrac’s don’t like being hit hard
[/quote] well I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that. but I hit mine pretty hard.. as a matter of fact the racepack will see close to 3 G's for the first few feet of the track.. which I think is relatively hard for a stock suspension door car.. shruggy

Last edited by WHITEDART; 08/02/18 03:49 PM.

In the 8s N/A.with Brett miller W8's
5.07 at 133 at 2700lb
Re: Starting line ratio ??? [Re: 03heavy] #2530552
08/02/18 05:07 PM
08/02/18 05:07 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
0
03heavy Offline OP
member
03heavy  Offline OP
member
0

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 52
Texas
From what I’m seeing the most guys using a 3 speed
With a aggressive rear axle ratio and a trans brake have trouble
With the 60’s Or from what I can tell anyways
You use a 904/727 or a glide whitedart

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1