Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: nd65] #2505525
06/07/18 10:59 AM
06/07/18 10:59 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 914
Unfortunately back in New York
N
Nukechargerboy Offline
super stock
Nukechargerboy  Offline
super stock
N

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 914
Unfortunately back in New York
I just soldered a diode between the two terminals and fished the wire through the connector and soldered the wire to the female spade connector. It's been flawless, I used to get hiccups when I only sandwiched the wire on the spade, now it's all good. I like the fitech, some don't but I'm pretty happy with it. Meanstreet with the FCC, I've had no problems with the FCC.

Last edited by Nukechargerboy; 06/07/18 11:00 AM.
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505534
06/07/18 11:47 AM
06/07/18 11:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,278
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,278
West Coast, USA
I'd go with the Holley unit based solely on what I've read on-line.

Regarding upgrading the fuel system. Keeping and using a stock tank with an up-sized return line silver soldered into the stock sending unit is an easy alternative to buying or cutting up and installing an internal fuel pump in an aftermarket tank.

I plumbed my EFI this way. To do this, I run an external pusher pump mounted near the stock tank that feeds a Surge Tank mounted in the engine compartment that free flows at near "0" psi back into the stock tank through an up-sized return line.

The high pressure fuel pump is mounted inside the surge tank, runs through my fuel rails and returns unused fuel back into the surge tank through a bypass regulator.

This system provides air bubble free fuel with the fuel level going down to just above a gallon of fuel in the tank.

I could have just as easily swapped the external pusher pump for an in-tank EFI rated pump that would slip through the stock sending unit opening, but the pusher pump works very well too.

I also run two Permacool water-trap fuel filters that filter down to 2 microns. One mounted under the car before the pusher pump, and one mounted just before the surge tank.

eng5 (Large) (Medium).png

1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: jbc426] #2505544
06/07/18 11:58 AM
06/07/18 11:58 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By jbc426
I'd go with the Holley unit based solely on what I've read on-line.

Regarding upgrading the fuel system. Keeping and using a stock tank with an up-sized return line silver soldered into the stock sending unit is an easy alternative to buying or cutting up and installing an internal fuel pump in an aftermarket tank.

I plumbed my EFI this way. To do this, I run an external pusher pump mounted near the stock tank that feeds a Surge Tank mounted in the engine compartment that free flows at near "0" psi back into the stock tank through an up-sized return line.



Key point here, you have to have some sort of air free fuel supply to the pump. You cannot just hang an in tank pump on the end of the stock pickup in an otherwise stock tanks and have it work, BTDT.

Went I first did an EFI swap I found that out the hard way, stupid Holley said nothing about it, old analog Projection system. One burned out pump and a tow later I got busy.

I went the surge tank route, using the stock mechanical pump to feed it, with the EFI return also plumbed into it and a return to the gas tank from the surge tank. But I had to make all that, no one was making anything like that back then nor was there any help on the internet.

there are plenty of ways to address the issue, from the pay someone to do it route and the way to making and doing it all yourself. I fall int eh middle these days, I'll put it together using parts others make, generally minimizing my fab tome these days.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505563
06/07/18 12:51 PM
06/07/18 12:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908
Nebraska
4
4406bbl Offline
top fuel
4406bbl  Offline
top fuel
4

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,908
Nebraska
I am going holley just because I have had such good luck with projection in the past. I did fail 1 original black 2bbl pump but switched to the 4bbl walbro, 20 years and 114,000 miles later it all still works. I just hung the pump in the frame with the stock lines. I have changed the tps once also. These systems really like a good alternator that will provide full 14 volts at idle, mine had the leece-neville from the start, may be why I had few problems.

Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505621
06/07/18 03:33 PM
06/07/18 03:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
MikeyT Offline OP
master
MikeyT  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
awesome support fellas


1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505623
06/07/18 03:40 PM
06/07/18 03:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline
top fuel
furious70  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
I've been running a walbro 255 hanging on the inner frame feeding my classic FAST system since 2009. While most of my driving is around town, I've done long trips including all day Power Tour runs. Haven't killed the pump yet. 100% stock pick up set up and OEM vapor return line as the return puts the fuel in the corner of the tank. This is not a quiet setup, but it was simple and effective. I just don't ever run the tank down to empty.

I'm confused as to why any EFI car would still be using the ballast resistor, unless you're still using the orange box? I use the starter solenoid as a power distribution center with a relay triggered by the ign circuit.


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505647
06/07/18 05:10 PM
06/07/18 05:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
OUTLAWD Offline
top fuel
OUTLAWD  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,942
Metro Detroit
another thread here:
https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbt...tml#Post2477534

I try not to trash the FITech system too much, but I will say you get what you pay for...

The instructions left a little to be desired, but if you have ever worked on a car, there is nothing that you can't figure out, especially with google as your friend. They really did a poor job explaining how to phase the distributor though...
If I wasn't redoing 90% of the car wiring and adding N2O at the same time, the FITech install would have taken 4 hours, tops.

I have a few thousand miles on the FITech, including ~75 passes and Drag Week

The FITech offered a lot of features, but it turns out that they are somewhat too good to be true.
- they originally advertised 9x12 spark and fuel tables...these tables are nowhere to be found (and no longer advertised)
- the software for the laptop is really not user friendly
- data logging is ~4Hz...better than nothing, barely. also quit working inexplicably first time at the track
- tech support is non-existent. the few times I had to call, I got the "back-up" tech guy, who might as well have been a random off the street. The main tech guy argued with me multiple times about an issue I had with the N2O spark retard adding timing instead of retarding timing...
- online support was also scarce (this is going back 2 years ago...) but not many people we running the FITech at the time, so there wasn't much online support presence. And the people who were running it were the ones who replaced their box stock carb that they couldn't tune and wanted a plug and play solution that they wouldn't have to touch...

You do have to drive it a bit to allow the system to learn. And allow it to learn at steady state before screwing with transient fuelling knobs... I ended up making my own VE surfaces based on the learned values.


Faster, Faster until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...

71 Swinger - slowly collecting dust/parts
66 Belv. II - just a streetcar
88 Mustang - turbo LS beater
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: furious70] #2505648
06/07/18 05:12 PM
06/07/18 05:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By furious70
I just don't ever run the tank down to empty.


When I ran mine anything below a quarter tank would suck air. Under half a tank with "aggressive" driving would suck air. I don;t know what pump Holley included in the Projection setup I had but it didn't like sucking air and it eventually quit.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505657
06/07/18 05:27 PM
06/07/18 05:27 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
MikeyT Offline OP
master
MikeyT  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
So here is my set up. It's a 1972 charger with the battery relocated to the back. I am not really interested in getting a new tank but will if I have too. I was planning in running the pump along the side next to the fuel lines.

Electically, how would you set it up?

Mike


1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505738
06/07/18 09:31 PM
06/07/18 09:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
GoodysGotaCuda Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd
GoodysGotaCuda  Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
I installed a FiTech on a family member's vehicle, it works alright but there are a few quirks. Support seems pretty poor, initial quality can be harsh [missing orings], software updates appear potentially disastrous. Ours is working okay out of the box, but following the FiTech facebook group will highlight some common issues.

That said, I will pursue a Holley system for my Warlock.


Also the more "open" of a system, the more you can screw up. Carburetors are pretty forgiving, when you go to EFI it typically does exactly what you tell it to...which can be wrong. The learning curve for the standalone port injection I have on the Hemi was pretty steep. But it is superior once dialed in.


1972 Barracuda - 5.7L Hemi, T56 Magnum 6spd - https://www.facebook.com/GoodysGotaHemi
2020 RAM 1500
[img]https://i.imgur.com/v9yezP9.jpg[/img]
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505744
06/07/18 09:57 PM
06/07/18 09:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Originally Posted By MikeyT
How would people do the plumbing for a job like this with a car that had a mechanical fuel pump? I run a standard 3/8' line with a return line.


As far as plumbing, stock (style) steel line should be fine. That is what I run. You will need to add high pressure capable flex lines. Fuel injection rated rubber hose should work. I used braided AN hose on my setup.

For the pump... there is good reason OE fuel systems use pump in tank. It is superior in terms of pump life and vapor lock. I ran and failed an external pump, switched to pump in tank and no problems.

As mentioned, the tank needs to be baffled properly to keep the pickup for the in tank pump submerged including with tank low.

Re: Better EFI system? [Re: Supercuda] #2505779
06/08/18 12:25 AM
06/08/18 12:25 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
furious70 Offline
top fuel
furious70  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,255
IL
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Originally Posted By furious70
I just don't ever run the tank down to empty.


When I ran mine anything below a quarter tank would suck air. Under half a tank with "aggressive" driving would suck air. I don;t know what pump Holley included in the Projection setup I had but it didn't like sucking air and it eventually quit.

Yes, if I get to around 1/4 tank and then want to get really froggy with it I've had it stumble on me. C body tank is a little bigger, but then again the big boat sloshes bigger waves smile These simple walbro pumps seem to be pretty tough, when I have to have more capacity (maybe even this year as I plan to turn the boost knob up) I'm not sure what I'm going to replace it with.


70 Sport Fury
68 Charger
69 Coronet
72 RR
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: Supercuda] #2505837
06/08/18 09:12 AM
06/08/18 09:12 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
GoodysGotaCuda Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd
GoodysGotaCuda  Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Originally Posted By furious70
I just don't ever run the tank down to empty.


When I ran mine anything below a quarter tank would suck air. Under half a tank with "aggressive" driving would suck air. I don;t know what pump Holley included in the Projection setup I had but it didn't like sucking air and it eventually quit.


Cavitation is much more tank dependent than pump. I have a baffled in-tank pump and can run pretty darn well with a gallon or two


1972 Barracuda - 5.7L Hemi, T56 Magnum 6spd - https://www.facebook.com/GoodysGotaHemi
2020 RAM 1500
[img]https://i.imgur.com/v9yezP9.jpg[/img]
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: GoodysGotaCuda] #2505871
06/08/18 11:08 AM
06/08/18 11:08 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By GoodysGotaCuda
Originally Posted By Supercuda
Originally Posted By furious70
I just don't ever run the tank down to empty.


When I ran mine anything below a quarter tank would suck air. Under half a tank with "aggressive" driving would suck air. I don;t know what pump Holley included in the Projection setup I had but it didn't like sucking air and it eventually quit.


Cavitation is much more tank dependent than pump. I have a baffled in-tank pump and can run pretty darn well with a gallon or two


And that is exactly why I said you cannot just hang a pump on the end of a stock pickup.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505879
06/08/18 11:23 AM
06/08/18 11:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,027
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,027
Tulsa OK
If I were to run a stock tank and EFI I would use the Holley Hyrdomat, its not cheap but proven to work.

I made a customed baffled sump for my stock tank and while I have never lost fuel pressure its crazy how much I can hear the pumps change tone with slosh on a low tank. I run two Walboro 255lph mounted just behind the tank, they are a few inches above the outlets on the tank and I am going to try going a little lower to see if it helps.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: GoodysGotaCuda] #2505898
06/08/18 12:39 PM
06/08/18 12:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,278
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,278
West Coast, USA
If you are running a surge tank based system, the stock, unbaffled tank works excellent when plumbed correctly. There are two things to keep in mind when using this system design.

One, running an EFI rated fuel pump submerged in fuel to cool it is the way they are designed to be run. They can live when mounted outside the tank, and depending on load, they can live a long time, or not.

Two, the fuel pressure in the feed to the surge tank from the stock tank is at or near "0" psi. This low pressure side of the system free flows from the tank, to the surge tank and back to the tank.

This low restriction, low-pressure side of the surge tank system not only reduces the load on the feed fuel pump which reduce their operating temperature(whether its mounted inside or outside the tank); and the high volume of fuel flowing through the low pressure loop to the surge tank cools the pump. Externally mounted pumps reduce the heat transferred to the fuel from their exterior surfaces, and are also slightly air cooled.

Virtually all the air is removed from the lines at the surge tank as the feed and return lines are mounted at the top of the surge tank.

The high pressure fuel pump is submerged in the bottom of the surge tank in cool, virtually air bubble free fuel even when the stock tank is down to just under a gallon of remaining fuel during road course type, full-throttle driving conditions.

There are a few decently baffled or sumped tanks out there, but using a surge tank can make even a stock tank work well for an EFI upgrade. I see a lot of guys spending big money on poorly designed baffled tanks and they still have problems running below half a tank of fuel. Note to self...it's not the tanks fault. It a failure to understand the benefits of using a surge tank.

Another alternative for really high power EFI systems is to use the newer GM modular Cadillac or Corvette fuel tank modules with additional pumps and pick-ups. Vaporworx has done a lot of interesting things with this set-up.
https://www.vaporworx.com/

Most modern "Tuner" cars run surge tanks on their high performance turbo motors for the same reason. A good surge tank set-up removes the air during tank slosh or low fuel situations.


1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: GoodysGotaCuda] #2505926
06/08/18 02:16 PM
06/08/18 02:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,269
Slantytown
DUFFMAN Offline
Ask And Ye Shall Receive
DUFFMAN  Offline
Ask And Ye Shall Receive

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,269
Slantytown
Originally Posted By GoodysGotaCuda
I installed a FiTech on a family member's vehicle, it works alright but there are a few quirks. Support seems pretty poor, initial quality can be harsh [missing orings], software updates appear potentially disastrous. Ours is working okay out of the box, but following the FiTech facebook group will highlight some common issues.

That said, I will pursue a Holley system for my Warlock.


Also the more "open" of a system, the more you can screw up. Carburetors are pretty forgiving, when you go to EFI it typically does exactly what you tell it to...which can be wrong. The learning curve for the standalone port injection I have on the Hemi was pretty steep. But it is superior once dialed in.


Too bad Chrysler never did a port injection system on an LA, and the Magnum barrel intake creates problems with hood clearance.


No longer taking $h!t from anyone!
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: MikeyT] #2505940
06/08/18 02:48 PM
06/08/18 02:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
MikeyT Offline OP
master
MikeyT  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,732
Watertown, WI
Great write up but the more I read this sounds like a good winter project! I got some parts above and beyond the kit to get. After all your feedback, I am gonna go with Holley Sniper set up and look to upgrade the fuel lines with an intank pump. Does anyone make a good aftermarket one for a 1972 charger?


1969 Dodge Dart Swinger
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: Bad340fish] #2505951
06/08/18 03:04 PM
06/08/18 03:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Originally Posted By Bad340fish
If I were to run a stock tank and EFI I would use the Holley Hyrdomat, its not cheap but proven to work.


The Walbro pickups work just as well and are an option to consider.

http://autoperformanceengineering.com/html/pickups.html


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Better EFI system? [Re: Bad340fish] #2505957
06/08/18 03:10 PM
06/08/18 03:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
GoodysGotaCuda Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd
GoodysGotaCuda  Offline
5.7L Hemi, 6spd

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 25,050
Texas
Originally Posted By Bad340fish
If I were to run a stock tank and EFI I would use the Holley Hyrdomat, its not cheap but proven to work.

I made a customed baffled sump for my stock tank and while I have never lost fuel pressure its crazy how much I can hear the pumps change tone with slosh on a low tank. I run two Walboro 255lph mounted just behind the tank, they are a few inches above the outlets on the tank and I am going to try going a little lower to see if it helps.


For the D150 tank we used an Aeromotive phantom fuel pump. Yes it was $380 or so, but it is very well designed. The plastic ring surrounding the foam with the return dumping into it makes a nice source for picking up fuel.

The D150 tank is very long, we will see how it performs at low fuel levels here soon, but I expect it to work quite well.

https://youtu.be/DYVFhKN6baQ


https://youtu.be/T9meZpKN1qo


1972 Barracuda - 5.7L Hemi, T56 Magnum 6spd - https://www.facebook.com/GoodysGotaHemi
2020 RAM 1500
[img]https://i.imgur.com/v9yezP9.jpg[/img]
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1