Re: Leaf spring sliders
[Re: clutch]
#2400106
11/07/17 07:32 PM
11/07/17 07:32 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505 TN
SCATPACK 1
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,505
TN
|
I read the whole thread but it doesn't say anything about the sliders with the angled slot. I don't have a question about sliders in general. I just want to know if there is an advantage to the angled slotted ones. The angled slider allow the spring to react easier as the natural movement of the rear half is to move down and away from the body/frame of the car.
Old Geezer Racing
|
|
|
Re: Leaf spring sliders
[Re: clutch]
#2400392
11/08/17 11:42 AM
11/08/17 11:42 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
On a high powered car, would that necessarily be a good thing? Seems like it would not since you need the rear shocks to be stiff on rebound to control the hit. I would think the sliders would let things move too freely and cause a need for the shocks to be even stiffer.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: Leaf spring sliders
[Re: clutch]
#2400477
11/08/17 01:48 PM
11/08/17 01:48 PM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 54 VA Beach, VA
Runnoft
member
|
member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 54
VA Beach, VA
|
Check the AFCO tech page. They recommend the slider slot be aimed at the front spring eye. A downward angle. When I set my car up they didn't have sliders with the built in angle so we had to fab an angled mounting point for the slider. Not a big deal but now the whole slider is available with the angle built in. I think the slider helps to keep the rate of change in ride height linear as the suspension moves. A shackle will change faster or slower depending on where in the shackle arc the rear spring eye is. Spend as much as you can afford on good shocks. I've been a 1.19 60' with leafs on a 28X10 radial. It works.
Cruiser: 66 Dodge Coronet 500, Indy SR 440, Gen 7 Accel EFI = 11.38 @ 116. Racing: Brand X, X275 Procharged Smallblock on M1, Leafsprings, Holley EFI = 4.30 @ 168
|
|
|
Re: Leaf spring sliders
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#2400488
11/08/17 02:10 PM
11/08/17 02:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266 Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
On a high powered car, would that necessarily be a good thing? Seems like it would not since you need the rear shocks to be stiff on rebound to control the hit. I would think the sliders would let things move too freely and cause a need for the shocks to be even stiffer. It's better to control the rear end movement with the shock, rather than binding. All of the GOOD shocks out there, are more than capable. Think about a ladder bar or 4 link car, no binding there with Heim joints, the shock controls everything.
-Dustin 67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi 68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
Re: Leaf spring sliders
[Re: clutch]
#2400506
11/08/17 02:38 PM
11/08/17 02:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
I understand. It's better as long as you have a GOOD shock. In my case, they'd probably not help until I got better shocks.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
|
|