Re: 2002 Dodge Viper racecar vs 1973 Plymouth Duster pro touring
[Re: Uhcoog1]
#2355928
08/18/17 10:28 AM
08/18/17 10:28 AM
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 723 Houston Tx
Uhcoog1
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 723
Houston Tx
|
2002 Viper specs for that run: 3350 lb with full load of fuel and driver Full cage, stiffened chassis Triple adjustable penskes- on base setting - no tuning done yet 18x13 with full tread Nitto NT01's: 335/30/18 square Dyno from 12 years ago was 530 rwhp on dyno jet
1973 Duster specs for that run: 3840 lb with 2/3 load of fuel and driver 4 point roll bar, minimal stiffening (subframe connectors, XV radiator crossmember) Bilstien RCD shocks. 1.04 TB's, 0" arch MP leafs, custom front sway, hellwig rear 18x9.5 with Hoosier Continental slicks: 285/30/18 square Dyno not run with 392, but assumed 480 rwhp based on prior #'s from 5.7 dyno (420)
The Viper is significantly easier to drive.
-'02 Dodge Viper Ex-World Challenge racecar -'73 Duster, 6.1 based 392 hilborn hemi, tko600, full floater rear 9", Hellwig custom bars, viper brakes, built for road course
|
|
|
Re: 2002 Dodge Viper racecar vs 1973 Plymouth Duster pro touring
[Re: Uhcoog1]
#2356062
08/18/17 02:37 PM
08/18/17 02:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
While we are looking at weight, keep in mind relocating required stuff to more advantageous places.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 2002 Dodge Viper racecar vs 1973 Plymouth Duster pro touring
[Re: Uhcoog1]
#2356774
08/19/17 08:34 PM
08/19/17 08:34 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
This makes the Duster look good lol! If it had the Vipers tires I bet it would get under 2 min.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
|
|