Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: RestoRick] #229853
02/20/09 07:30 PM
02/20/09 07:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
D
DPelletier Offline
I Live Here
DPelletier  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
Add me to the list;

my factory '70 V1X top car had the factory plastic filler. I was also of the opinion that only painted roofs got the lead (although I'm sure there were exceptions)

Cheers,
Dave


1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack 1974 'Cuda 2008 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Ram 3500 Diesel 2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel 2003 Ram 3500 Diesel 2006 Durango Limited [url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: DPelletier] #229854
02/20/09 08:57 PM
02/20/09 08:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
A
AdamR Offline
master
AdamR  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,978
Bethel Ct
71 Barracuda at the shop has vinyl top and filler in the roof seems

So does my 71 Dart.

Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: smac77] #229855
02/22/09 01:02 PM
02/22/09 01:02 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
D
denfireguy Offline
top fuel
denfireguy  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


This may have been done before but let's here some veiws for lead or lead free solder vs filler in a factory panel seam, ie: 1/4 panel to roof where the joint is quite large?




Its been discussed before and the factory seemed to have lead in the painted roofs and plastic in the vinyl top models. I would prefer lead.



I've never seen plastic behind a vinyl from the factory? Not pre 73 anyway, they've always been lead in any that I've removed...






My 73 is lead. The rest of the vinyl portion of the roof was primer with some body color overspray and that is it. There was no rust when the vinyl was removed. There was some rust in the passenger lower quarter that was replaced but in my opinion, it was attacked from the interior from other rust in that quarter allowing moisture into the trunk.
Craig


2014 Ram 1500 Laramie, 73 Cuda
Previous mopars: 62 Valiant, 65 Fury III, 68 Fury III, 72 Satellite, 74 Satellite, 89 Acclaim, 98 Caravan, 2003 Durango
Only previous Non-Mopar: Schwinn Tornado
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: smac77] #229856
02/23/09 09:36 PM
02/23/09 09:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
Caledon, Ontario
smac77 Offline OP
mopar
smac77  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
Caledon, Ontario
Thanks guys for all the input...

I'm currently doing a 70 cuda, 68 charger, 69 dart and a 70 challenger... all vinyls all factory lead....all had either some rot or deep pitting underneath the lead... so although it's been in there for 30 plus years it did fail...

I've always re-done mine with lead but the reason I posted this was I heard a number of positive feedback comments on another forum about welding the seems shut (like resto rick said above), epoxying and using evercoats everglass then a light skim of rage on top and you're done... no moisture problems as the everglass on the bottom is waterproof, no acid trap to worry about with lead.... Anyone used it before? here's a link: http://www.evercoat.com/productDetail.aspx?pID=36


Restoration, Sales and Canadian Distributor For:
AMD Sheetmetal
Wizzard Direct Fit, Bolt In Aluminum Radiators
Legendary Interiors
SSBC & Wilwood Brakes
Control Freak Suspensions
Fine lines Tubing
and many more...
www.macleanclassics.com
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: RestoRick] #229857
02/23/09 09:44 PM
02/23/09 09:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
Caledon, Ontario
smac77 Offline OP
mopar
smac77  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 417
Caledon, Ontario
Quote:

The factory "Process Standard" paperwork I've seen & read, states the filler used under vinyl was a heat cured material. (Called Plasti-sol IIRC).
Similar to bondo, but as mentioned, more like the hardness of the factory seam sealer.
It failed miserably when moisture would get behind it through the open spot welded roof seam and cause rusting & filler puckering.
I've personally seen one or two cars with lead used under an original vinyl top, but I'm of the opinion that most were done with the plastic material.

The seam needs to be welded solid and pinhole free in order for plastic fillers to last.
I'm a firm believer in welding the seam solid and using lead filler on painted top cars.

More info on the lead vs. plastic debate here...
Leadwork 101

Rick


good article rick, maybe the guys at chrysler should have been as careful with their prep!


Restoration, Sales and Canadian Distributor For:
AMD Sheetmetal
Wizzard Direct Fit, Bolt In Aluminum Radiators
Legendary Interiors
SSBC & Wilwood Brakes
Control Freak Suspensions
Fine lines Tubing
and many more...
www.macleanclassics.com
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: smac77] #229858
02/23/09 09:54 PM
02/23/09 09:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,363
Iowa
burdar Offline
Owen's Dad
burdar  Offline
Owen's Dad

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,363
Iowa
Quote:

My 73 is lead. The rest of the vinyl portion of the roof was primer with some body color overspray and that is it.




My 73 Challenger has filler in the roof NOT lead. I took the origonal vynal top off the car. It was primered underneith.

Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: burdar] #229859
02/24/09 05:39 AM
02/24/09 05:39 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 401
Berlin, Germany
Flo Offline
mopar
Flo  Offline
mopar

Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 401
Berlin, Germany
my67 Fury had lead under the vinyl roof.

I left the lead on as that was one of the few places where there was no rust.

If I replaced something I would use a high quality body filler. The acid you are using with the lead can cause severe trouble especially in seams.


1967 Fury III 4door HT tiny 318, late model roller block, bored and stroked to 344
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: burdar] #229860
02/24/09 06:49 PM
02/24/09 06:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
D
denfireguy Offline
top fuel
denfireguy  Offline
top fuel
D

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,822
Colorado
Quote:

Quote:

My 73 is lead. The rest of the vinyl portion of the roof was primer with some body color overspray and that is it.




My 73 Challenger has filler in the roof NOT lead. I took the origonal vynal top off the car. It was primered underneith.



I took the original off too. Maybe it was where it was made at. Mine was from Hamtramck.

Craig


2014 Ram 1500 Laramie, 73 Cuda
Previous mopars: 62 Valiant, 65 Fury III, 68 Fury III, 72 Satellite, 74 Satellite, 89 Acclaim, 98 Caravan, 2003 Durango
Only previous Non-Mopar: Schwinn Tornado
Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: Flo] #229861
02/24/09 10:59 PM
02/24/09 10:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,247
Fremont, CA.
Topcat Offline
pro stock
Topcat  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,247
Fremont, CA.
Quote:



The acid you are using with the lead can cause severe trouble especially in seams.




I don't agree with that entirely. The big word here is CAN. If you do a thorough cleaning of the area after the work is done, it'll be fine. Pock holes and any small crevices can hold the acid. But again, it needs to be a smooth layer as possible and cleaned real well after.

Re: Lead vs Filler [Re: Topcat] #229862
02/25/09 12:22 AM
02/25/09 12:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,489
west kentucky
G
gomangoRTSE Offline
pro stock
gomangoRTSE  Offline
pro stock
G

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,489
west kentucky
Regardless of what you prefer, 97% of those in this room have little or no experience in lead work. I heated up areas of my car where the lead got hot enough fall off. That was beneath the door in and around where the rear qtr panel seams/kick panel area is. I refilled it with a good quality Evercoat Rage Extreme after cleaning it out very well. I didnt try and melt all the lead out, just enough where it was seamed and just below the natural body line level.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1