Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... #2248156
02/06/17 12:02 AM
02/06/17 12:02 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 180
merrill, wisconsin
V
voigtspeed Offline OP
member
voigtspeed  Offline OP
member
V

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 180
merrill, wisconsin
What rockers do you like the best and why ?

Do not want to go with the cost of jessel so it is T+D or Harland sharp.

Last edited by voigtspeed; 02/06/17 12:02 AM.

ACCELERATION SPECIALIST
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248176
02/06/17 12:21 AM
02/06/17 12:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
T&D with a bushing, not the bearing.

They'll make them, you just have to ask.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: madscientist] #2248178
02/06/17 12:24 AM
02/06/17 12:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
I have both and have had zero issues with either sets and I love the bearings in both


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: madscientist] #2248189
02/06/17 12:37 AM
02/06/17 12:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 126
Howell,MI
M
Moparpoor Offline
member
Moparpoor  Offline
member
M

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 126
Howell,MI
Love my T&D rockers. Why the bushing? I run the bearings

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248235
02/06/17 01:49 AM
02/06/17 01:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
Are you wanting to buy the single shaft systems from both? If so either one will work, I've had and used both up
I have two motors now with Harland Sharp 1.6 ratio and one set of heads with a set of T&D single shaft system with 1.7 ratio and another untested motor with Jesel 1.55 ratio paired shaft system on it shruggy
The motor with the Jesel rockers rotate a lot easier once broken away than any other motor I have built or tested work scope
I am gathering parts now for a all out go fast motor with B1-MC heads and I will probally buy a set of the stainless steel(chrome moly maybe?) T&D 1.7 ratio paired rocker arm set up from them for this motor twocents


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248260
02/06/17 02:19 AM
02/06/17 02:19 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
Unless the HS setup is a lot less expensive and there's a budget issue, IMO the T&D is a better designed and machined rocker.

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248317
02/06/17 08:30 AM
02/06/17 08:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,836
MI, usa
dvw Offline
master
dvw  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,836
MI, usa
The T&D paired are the nicest rocker system I've ever used. Nice to be able to remove them a pair at time if needed. In my experience they will wear the shaft before they hurt a bearing. I replaced the bearings in mine last year. I have no idea how many passes they had before me but I'll bet they were somewhere around 1000. Cost $96 to replace all 32 bearings. All looked and felt fine. I had 3 shaft that showed brinelling. They were $25 a piece.
Doug

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: Moparpoor] #2248459
02/06/17 02:07 PM
02/06/17 02:07 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By Moparpoor
Love my T&D rockers. Why the bushing? I run the bearings



The short answer is never run a needle bearing on a reciprocating shaft. GM had a system so [censored] that the needle bearing was actually a step up. And the industry followed right along and the rest of us get the same garbage.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248464
02/06/17 02:15 PM
02/06/17 02:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
If you're going to run springs that are larger than about 1.580, and installed heights taller than about 1.950....... And the T&D system you're considering is the "single shaft" set-up, then you'll more than likely have to do some relieving of the rockers to clear the springs/retainers.

The HS rockers clear 1.625 springs with no issues.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: fast68plymouth] #2248492
02/06/17 02:46 PM
02/06/17 02:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
If you're going to run springs that are larger than about 1.580, and installed heights taller than about 1.950....... And the T&D system you're considering is the "single shaft" set-up, then you'll more than likely have to do some relieving of the rockers to clear the springs/retainers.

The HS rockers clear 1.625 springs with no issues.




If I remember right Harland Sharp will also clearance the rockers for more if asked to do so.


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248592
02/06/17 05:03 PM
02/06/17 05:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,036
Oregon
T&D will do a spring relief on the rocker arm as an option. I had that done on the T&D rockers for my Trick Flow heads.

I've used both T&D and Harland and there isn't any power difference between them. T&D rockers are smaller and lighter and work with pushrod oiling. The Harland rockers are big and beefy and designed to work with shaft oiling.

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248732
02/06/17 09:46 PM
02/06/17 09:46 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,575
K
KOS Offline
pro stock
KOS  Offline
pro stock
K

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,575
T+D hands down............ive broke HS with a solid flat tappet never any breakage with T+Ds

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248766
02/06/17 10:24 PM
02/06/17 10:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,363
Cotati, CA
Dave Hall Offline
top fuel
Dave Hall  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,363
Cotati, CA
I have both and did break a HS once. It took about 700 runs though. I bought the T&D's for my -1 setup and haven't had an issue in three years. The LSM tool is golden for proper torque and adjustment.

Last edited by Dave Hall; 02/06/17 10:25 PM.
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248793
02/06/17 10:58 PM
02/06/17 10:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,040
Mt Morris Michigan
mopar dave Offline
master
mopar dave  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,040
Mt Morris Michigan
Harland Sharp can be ordered with pushrod oiling and cup adjuster as an option at no extra charge. Just remember the HS do not come with mounting bolts or studs. T&D come with all mounting hardware. Best price for HS was found thru Don at FBO.

Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: mopar dave] #2248877
02/07/17 01:09 AM
02/07/17 01:09 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 180
merrill, wisconsin
V
voigtspeed Offline OP
member
voigtspeed  Offline OP
member
V

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 180
merrill, wisconsin
Thanks for all the input looking for the best in my budget regretfully paired rockers may be a little out of reach right now.

I was leaning toward T+D I have heard good about them I have also had good luck with harland sharp but never used them on 440-1 heads.

Thanks for the heads up on spring diameter. How they fit clearance and geometry wise was another question....

Now to price them.


ACCELERATION SPECIALIST
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2248956
02/07/17 03:45 AM
02/07/17 03:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,185
Bend,OR USA
I've owned and raced both T&D and Harland Sharp single shafts set ups on Indy heads, I'll buy another set of Harland Sharps for my next single shaft Indy headed motor build up


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: voigtspeed] #2249068
02/07/17 01:38 PM
02/07/17 01:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
As was posted on another site....
Quote "with all the steel rockers available today, why would anyone run aluminum?"

I'd also add why would any one run needle bearings. They are so 1977.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: madscientist] #2249071
02/07/17 01:45 PM
02/07/17 01:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
Originally Posted By madscientist
As was posted on another site....
Quote "with all the steel rockers available today, why would anyone run aluminum?"

I'd also add why would any one run needle bearings. They are so 1977.


And which bushed steel rocker system do you recommend to use on the OP's Indy 440-1 heads?


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: fast68plymouth] #2249108
02/07/17 02:48 PM
02/07/17 02:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
M
madscientist Offline
master
madscientist  Offline
master
M

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
Originally Posted By madscientist
As was posted on another site....
Quote "with all the steel rockers available today, why would anyone run aluminum?"

I'd also add why would any one run needle bearings. They are so 1977.


And which bushed steel rocker system do you recommend to use on the OP's Indy 440-1 heads?


He is probably stuck with aluminum but he could at least use a bushing instead of needle bearings.

I'd be surprised if Jesel didn't have something.


This is why no one runs chryslers. If someone made a steel rocker, would any one buy it? I doubt it. When I begged for a set of Norris stainless rockers people made fun of me.

Aluminum was only good for the manufacturers.


So, my point should have been if I ever do another race car, it will have other than a Chrysler in it. You can only cobble junk along so much and then you just say [censored] it.


Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
Re: Harland sharp or T+D rockers for 440-1 heads... [Re: madscientist] #2249141
02/07/17 03:46 PM
02/07/17 03:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
pittsburghracer Offline
"Little"John
pittsburghracer  Offline
"Little"John

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,174
PA.
Originally Posted By madscientist
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
Originally Posted By madscientist
As was posted on another site....
Quote "with all the steel rockers available today, why would anyone run aluminum?"

I'd also add why would any one run needle bearings. They are so 1977.


And which bushed steel rocker system do you recommend to use on the OP's Indy 440-1 heads?


He is probably stuck with aluminum but he could at least use a bushing instead of needle bearings.

I'd be surprised if Jesel didn't have something.


This is why no one runs chryslers. If someone made a steel rocker, would any one buy it? I doubt it. When I begged for a set of Norris stainless rockers people made fun of me.

Aluminum was only good for the manufacturers.


So, my point should have been if I ever do another race car, it will have other than a Chrysler in it. You can only cobble junk along so much and then you just say [censored] it.



No one runs Mopars. Give me a break and come to Ohio or Pennsylvania and see how many Mopars run at our tracks. Lol. And we run the crap out of our aluminum roller bearing lifters. 40 years and never broke an aluminum roller bearing rocker but I don't run crap either. Harland Sharp or t&d rockers for me


1970 Duster
Edelbrock headed 408
5.984@112.52
422 Indy headed small block
5.982@112.56 mph
9.42@138.27

Livin and lovin life one day at a time




Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1