Re: Went on the chassis dyno today. Any guesses?
[Re: Charger453]
#2178701
10/19/16 06:31 PM
10/19/16 06:31 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500 MD
JACK1440
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 500
MD
|
|
|
|
Re: Went on the chassis dyno today. Any guesses?
[Re: Charger453]
#2178716
10/19/16 07:15 PM
10/19/16 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,493 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,493
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
No Mustang experience, but based on what I think is about what the motor should make, and figuring a reasonable percentage of loss......
595-620hp
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Went on the chassis dyno today. Any guesses?
[Re: Charger453]
#2178945
10/20/16 01:44 AM
10/20/16 01:44 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,493 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,493
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Looks like I had a good guess.
The peaks on the chassis dyno aren't necessarily where they would be on an engine dyno. You have the interaction of the engine and converter when you're on the chassis dyno.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: Went on the chassis dyno today. Any guesses?
[Re: Charger453]
#2179025
10/20/16 10:31 AM
10/20/16 10:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Looks good!!! Those numbers aren't far off from what my 572 hemi laid down on the local Dynojet, but we all know how dyno numbers are. Mine made 636 hp and 554 ft lbs.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: Went on the chassis dyno today. Any guesses?
[Re: Charger453]
#2179049
10/20/16 11:21 AM
10/20/16 11:21 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495 Shelby mi.
JAKE68
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,495
Shelby mi.
|
I have been accused of my dyno being "happy" so we had 10 corvettes from Ktech get dynode on there mustang dyno early one morning then came here and we ran them on mine . All made 2-6 hp less on mine. Dynojet dyno is the only certified dyno for nasa. Being that it is a fixed weight it is way more repeatable than an eddie current type dyno. For one if you are looking at numbers on chassis dyno you are miss using it. It is a tool for tuning. I see more often people not happy with their results because they read on the internet that it should have made xx more then what we got. The real advantage to a eddie current type dyno is that it is a little more accurate when doing low speed drivability. The op shows some very nice numbers there, it looks like a nice piece,but all he got was a number. Show us the fuel curve,what about the runs that he changed timing was it a pay raise or pay cut. getting the bace line is just the number but by not showing the fuel curve dosnt show what direction to go. thanks Flame on.
Last edited by JAKE68; 10/20/16 11:23 AM.
JAKES AUTOMOTIVE
|
|
|
|
|