Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
741 742 489 #2169272
10/06/16 10:03 PM
10/06/16 10:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 13
Md
Slanteye6 Offline OP
member
Slanteye6  Offline OP
member

Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 13
Md
Hello

Anyone one know what the differeance is in these 8 3/4 center sections? I want to put one in a dodge pick up 2 wd 1/2 ton

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169281
10/06/16 10:12 PM
10/06/16 10:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Tech Archive...start here:
http://www.moparts.org/Tech/Archive/axle/1.html

R.

Let me be the first to say you need a Dana 60!
haha

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169285
10/06/16 10:15 PM
10/06/16 10:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936
own private Idaho
N
ngpSatellite Offline
super stock
ngpSatellite  Offline
super stock
N

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 936
own private Idaho
The Chrysler 8-3/4" rear axle assembly was introduced in 1957. It is a banjo-type, the differential is contained in a removable carrier assembly. The axle has an 8-3/4" diameter ring gear. There are three basic types available distinguished by their drive pinion stem diameter. The 8-3/4" axle was the primary axle assembly used in most car lines through 1972.

8-3/4" Axle Center Section Types

The 8-3/4" axle was available in three basic types. The types are differentiated by the pinion stem diameter....1-3/8", 1-3/4", 1-7/8". The choice of axle pinion assembly was determined based on the application.

1-3/8" small stem pinion (741) Carrier casting numbers: 1820657 (1957-1964), 2070741 (1964-1972). These numbers are found on the left side of the carrier assembly.

This assembly was typically used in low weight/low horsepower (Small Block as an example) applications through low weight/medium horsepower and high weight / low horsepower applications. Pinion depth and bearing preload is set with shims. Differential bearing setting (i.e. backlash ) is set with threaded adjusters.

1-3/4" large stem pinion. (742) Carrier casting numbers: 1634985 (1957-1964), 2070742 (1961-1969). This assembly was replaced by a 1-7/8" pinion starting in the 1969 model year. 1970 Plymouth and Dodge b Bodies were the last models to use the 1-3/4" which appeared in a 2881489 case.

This assembly was typically used in high weight/medium horsepower applications through high weight/high horsepower applications. Pinion depth and bearing preload is set with shims. Differential bearing setting (i.e. backlash ) is set with threaded adjusters.

1-7/8" tapered stem pinion. (489) Carrier casting numbers: 2881488, 2881489 (1969-1974).

This assembly was introduced in 1969 and gradually replace the 1-3/4" unit through 1970 The 1-3/4" pinion also appeared in some 489 carriers during this period. By 1973, the 489 was the only unit available in passenger car applications.

This assembly was typically used in high weight/medium horsepower through high weight/high horsepower applications. Pinion depth is set with shims, preload is set with a crush sleeve. Differential bearing setting (backlash) is set with threaded adjusters.

All 8-3/4" carrier assemblies can be identified externally by the casting numbers. Additionally, the 741 commonly has a large X cast on the left side, the 742 may have a large 2 cast on the left side, and the 489 has a large 9 cast on the left side. Through 1965, the factory ratio was stamped on the identification boss, followed by an S if

Sure Grip equipped. After 1965, a tag was affixed under one of the carrier mounting nuts to identify the ratio. If Sure Grip equipped, an additional Sure Grip lube tag was sometimes affixed; later years sometimes had the filler plug painted orange.

Gear ratios available on the 8-3/4" axle through the years include:

2.76, 2.93, 3.23, 3.31, 3.55, 3.73, 3.91, 4.10, 4.56, 4.89, 5.17, 5.57.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169324
10/06/16 10:52 PM
10/06/16 10:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
C
crlush Offline
pro stock
crlush  Offline
pro stock
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,322
Michigan
what are your plans hp wise with the truck?

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169407
10/07/16 01:02 AM
10/07/16 01:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,077
CA
C
crackedback Offline
top fuel
crackedback  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 2,077
CA
Probably wouldn't hurt any of them and they ALL have a downside.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: crackedback] #2169445
10/07/16 03:08 AM
10/07/16 03:08 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
I would Keep It Simple Sam and search for a 742 (preferred) or 741 sure grip which would from the factory both have the highly desired clutch type sure grip in the ratio you desire for your app. if the pinion yoke does not match your driveshaft there is a combo ujoint to easily solve that minor dilemma. EDIT there is also a 6.20 742 gearset (I have one)

Last edited by RapidRobert; 10/07/16 03:18 AM.

live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: RapidRobert] #2169519
10/07/16 11:04 AM
10/07/16 11:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,408
north of coder
moparx Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"
moparx  Offline
"Butt Crack Bob"

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,408
north of coder
i believe there was a 5.12 and a 5.38 gearset as well. i have two 5.38 setups on the shelf at present.
beer

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: moparx] #2169647
10/07/16 02:48 PM
10/07/16 02:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,105
Western Md.
skicker Offline
"The Champ"
skicker  Offline
"The Champ"

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,105
Western Md.
I destroyed a 5.67 that was purchased from Petty many moons ago... Several years back (20?)I know a 5.57 could still be bought for a 742...


...FAFO...
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169652
10/07/16 02:53 PM
10/07/16 02:53 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,195
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,195
Bend,OR USA
The 741 and 489 cases both use the smaller front pinion bearing, the 742 use a larger front pinion bearing and race and they are the ones I prefer to use on any Mopar that will be beat on heavily and drove aggressively thumbs scope

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 10/07/16 02:54 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169672
10/07/16 03:29 PM
10/07/16 03:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,817
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,817
Rio Linda, CA

They all physically interchange but the yoke has three different u-joint profiles and the pre-'64 center thrust block might not work with '66 and later rear ends.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: John_Kunkel] #2169743
10/07/16 05:12 PM
10/07/16 05:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Blazin' Bob, I need to remind you that 741 production carried over into the '70s and they came with the cone type Suregrip.

I also need to remind you that it has been 40+ years since the last 8 3/4 rolled off the production line. In that time any differential may have been tinkered with. For a while it was easier to get an Auburn cone type than the Powr Lock. You never know until you open it up.

Also, you make it sound like every 741 or 742 rear had a Suregrip factory stock. I'm sure you know that this isn't true, far from it.

You are more likely to find a Suregrip under a pickup or station wagon that someone used for towing, and in the high performance cars.

To the OP: The rear end only has to stand what the tires can resist. 741s outnumber 742s and 489s by probably 5:1. I have used a 741 in my '64Dog D100 and have made several long pulls with 6000 lb of trailer behind me. I have had no problems except for seals getting old.

IMHO the best and smartest thing you could do is telephone DoctorDiff. If you buy a limited slip, get it from him as well.

R.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169800
10/07/16 07:33 PM
10/07/16 07:33 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I ran a 741 case 3.91:1 in the 12-second charger for years till the limited-slip started making noise, so even the "weakest" 8-3/4 is still pretty good in my book. 742's seem to be harder to find. The 489 with a crush sleeve eliminator kit might be strongest?
There are two different U-Joint yoke sizes, but also two different pinion spline counts making 4 different possible yokes. I think the 10-spline large U-joint yokes are really expensive compared to the other three, but I haven't looked into it in years. I went with a Strange S60 with spool when the Limited slip started making bad noises.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: dogdays] #2169825
10/07/16 08:12 PM
10/07/16 08:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:
Blazin' Bob, I need to remind you that 741 production carried over into the '70s and they came with the cone type Suregrip.
I did not know that. I stand correct(ed)


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: John_Kunkel] #2169875
10/07/16 09:16 PM
10/07/16 09:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
N
NANKET Offline
master
NANKET  Offline
master
N

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
Originally Posted By John_Kunkel

They all physically interchange but the yoke has three different u-joint profiles and the pre-'64 center thrust block might not work with '66 and later rear ends.


Open rear end only, the 64 and older thrust block is 1.25", 65 and newer thrust block is 1.5" so they will not interchange.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169887
10/07/16 09:28 PM
10/07/16 09:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,066
Eugene, Oregon
M
minivan Offline
master
minivan  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,066
Eugene, Oregon
JohnRR on here will recommend a cone type sure grip as being the best..

Last edited by minivan; 10/07/16 09:29 PM.
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: minivan] #2169916
10/07/16 10:05 PM
10/07/16 10:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline
master
DrCharles  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Originally Posted By minivan
JohnRR on here will recommend a cone type sure grip as being the best..
popcorn

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2169919
10/07/16 10:09 PM
10/07/16 10:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 653
montana
P
pjc360 Offline
mopar
pjc360  Offline
mopar
P

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 653
montana
742 with 4.56 gears and a sure grip is what I run in my 91 half ton short bed dodge truck with a 300hp crate 360 magnum.
Haven't had any issues with it at all.

Re: 741 742 489 [Re: pjc360] #2170268
10/08/16 01:35 PM
10/08/16 01:35 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
what I would do is find/buy a good 742 sure grip in the ratio you want & you're set. it would have the desired clutch type from the factory & highly likely that has not been swapped (if you see no springs in there you are golden). I highly prefer a ring gear felpro gasket as opposed to using RTV. some heavy parts house gear oil (I forget the weight) with a bottle of furd sure grip additive. set your axle end play to .010


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: 741 742 489 [Re: Slanteye6] #2179895
10/21/16 06:31 PM
10/21/16 06:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 13
Md
Slanteye6 Offline OP
member
Slanteye6  Offline OP
member

Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 13
Md
Thanks for your replies, I finally found a 742 case sure 3:23 for the cuda.👍







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1