Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2125282
08/04/16 11:02 PM
08/04/16 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Turbos are easier on tires and drivetrain.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine?
[Re: hudsonhornet7x]
#2125524
08/05/16 10:42 AM
08/05/16 10:42 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,209 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,209
New York
|
750 hp can use a turbo as small as 64mm if it's a modern design like the Precision CEA Gen-2. Choosing that microwave-size 100mm for highest peak power is generally a mistake, you can't make boost for launch without really buzzing the engine against the rev limiter. I have small turbos with only about 500 hp, with boost as low as 2,000 rpm. Once you pick a compressor size, next is to see what someone with a similar engine uses for A/R: the general idea is small engine, small A/R. IDK of any math that will work here; Precision will give you a good choice if you buy from them. For many apps there is an OEM iron manifold choice that will produce 95% of "tuned" (= $$$) header results for 10% of the price. Many LSX with iron manifolds: 1,000 hp. What transmission?
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine?
[Re: GTS340]
#2125713
08/05/16 01:57 PM
08/05/16 01:57 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696 Bitopia
jcc
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
|
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
|
Turbo is easiest on engine the reason being was I always thought, the piston, rod, crank on the up stroke/exhaust are always working against exhaust pressure.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
|
|
|
|
|