Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? #2125168
08/04/16 08:13 PM
08/04/16 08:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
H
hudsonhornet7x Offline OP
pro stock
hudsonhornet7x  Offline OP
pro stock
H

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
For forced induction application, is one easier on internal engine parts than another? Or is boost just boost no matter how you get it?

For this instance lets say you have a 750 horsepower goal, so nothing extraordinary.

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125217
08/04/16 09:28 PM
08/04/16 09:28 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
GTS340 Offline
mopar
GTS340  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
Turbo is easiest on engine

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125235
08/04/16 10:00 PM
08/04/16 10:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 733
jacksonville,FLORIDA
slammedR/T Offline
super stock
slammedR/T  Offline
super stock

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 733
jacksonville,FLORIDA
subscribed


2000 Dakota R/T, 408 magnum, 727, Indy heads
1000cfm 4150 carb, 93 octane fuel.
motor; 10.258 @ 132.78
200 shot; 9.262 @ 144.69
racemagnum
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125277
08/04/16 10:56 PM
08/04/16 10:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
Supercharger takes power to drive. So whatever that load is, the crank sees fwhp+blower drive power in reality.

Turbo cars are notoriously hard on exhaust valves.

Roots/Whipple can make wicked low end torque like a turbo which is harder on parts then the centrifugal blowers do because they don't make peak boost until peak RPM.

Both can be hard on pistons and headgaskets if you miss the tuneup.

Both are much more forgiving on the motor then NA or nitrous of the same power because they have lower peak cylinder pressures. They just hold the pressure longer and further away from TDC which is easy on parts.

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125282
08/04/16 11:02 PM
08/04/16 11:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
Turbos are easier on tires and drivetrain.


Mopar to the bone!!!
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125291
08/04/16 11:14 PM
08/04/16 11:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
D
dizuster Offline
master
dizuster  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,635
Oakland, MI
I beg to differ on the drivetrain!

Mine has killed the front planet, rolled a sprag (with a LBA valve body), and sheared the yoke right off a 8 3/4"...now this.

https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/ubbt...tml#Post2121136

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125347
08/05/16 12:01 AM
08/05/16 12:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Q
quickd100 Offline
master
quickd100  Offline
master
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Miss the tuneup and the blower or turbo can really mess up your day. My 'mild' 318 has so far eaten 4 pistons. In both cases it was real fun for a couple seconds. Note to self, you've got to do a turbo 440.

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125348
08/05/16 12:03 AM
08/05/16 12:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
H
hudsonhornet7x Offline OP
pro stock
hudsonhornet7x  Offline OP
pro stock
H

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
I was thinking turbo with a self learning efi like fitech. Any objections?

Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125377
08/05/16 12:45 AM
08/05/16 12:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,223
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,223
Bend,OR USA
If it is for street use make sure and use a intercooler and monitor the intake manifold inlet temps thumbs twocents


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #2125524
08/05/16 10:42 AM
08/05/16 10:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,209
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,209
New York
750 hp can use a turbo as small as 64mm if it's a modern design like the Precision CEA Gen-2.
Choosing that microwave-size 100mm for highest peak power is generally a mistake, you can't make boost for launch without really buzzing the engine against the rev limiter. I have small turbos with only about 500 hp, with boost as low as 2,000 rpm.
Once you pick a compressor size, next is to see what someone with a similar engine uses for A/R: the general idea is small engine, small A/R. IDK of any math that will work here; Precision will give you a good choice if you buy from them.
For many apps there is an OEM iron manifold choice that will produce 95% of "tuned" (= $$$) header results for 10% of the price. Many LSX with iron manifolds: 1,000 hp.
What transmission?


Boffin Emeritus
Re: Supercharger vs, Turbocharger Is one harder on an engine? [Re: GTS340] #2125713
08/05/16 01:57 PM
08/05/16 01:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
J
jcc Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
jcc  Offline
If you can't dazzle em with diamonds..
J

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,696
Bitopia
Originally Posted By GTS340
Turbo is easiest on engine


the reason being was I always thought, the piston, rod, crank on the up stroke/exhaust are always working against exhaust pressure.


Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1