Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Factory dyno engines #2114416
07/20/16 10:43 PM
07/20/16 10:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384
Worst Weather USA
493_DART Offline OP
master
493_DART  Offline OP
master

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,384
Worst Weather USA
Has anyone ever built a fresh 440 six pack and 426 hemi using 100% factory spec parts...and dyno'd them?

any links?

I was curious as to how close the advertised factory hp/tq ratings were back then

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2114828
07/21/16 02:37 PM
07/21/16 02:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,380
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,380
Marion, South Carolina [><]
Dulcich did a test in one of the Mopar Mags years ago w/ a stock 383 magnum and then a stock 440 magnum 4V. The 383 was about dead on 335 hp and the 440 was around 360 hp if I recall correctly.
Seems like I remember a similar test w/ a hemi, but not 100% sure.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2114909
07/21/16 04:29 PM
07/21/16 04:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,082
U.S.S.A.
Back then the factory dyno'd the engines without ant accessories being driven by the engine that would have robbed HP, that changed in the early 70's.



running up my post count some more .
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: JohnRR] #2114995
07/21/16 06:14 PM
07/21/16 06:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Originally Posted By JohnRR
Back then the factory dyno'd the engines without ant accessories being driven by the engine that would have robbed HP, that changed in the early 70's.



I don't see the magazines dyno testing engines with alternators, stock exhaust systems and air cleaners either so it should be a pretty fair test.

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2115013
07/21/16 06:37 PM
07/21/16 06:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,269
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,269
Bend,OR USA
I built and dyno tested a stock stroke 440(446 C.I.) +.030 bore size 6 pak motor using forged TRW 6 pak pistons with LY rods and a little bit bigger cam, it was a street motor on pump gas with stock 906 heads and under 9.5 to 1 compression for the pump gas back then. It made 470 HP at 5400 RPM and , if I'm remembering corrrectly still, also more torque than HP shruggy
As fas as the factory going from gross HP at the flywheel with no accessorys to net HP with all the accessorys hooked up that was to lower the HP ratings for insurance rates devilscope shruggy I think GM started lowering the compression ratio in 1971 on all thier performance packages also, not sure about Ford. Mopar followed in 1972 whiney shruggy

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 07/21/16 06:38 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2115042
07/21/16 07:27 PM
07/21/16 07:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 418
NH, USA
toddinNH Offline
Egghead
toddinNH  Offline
Egghead

Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 418
NH, USA
Originally Posted By 493_DART


I was curious as to how close the advertised factory hp/tq ratings were back then


I think that these things are easy enough to find.

Here is your list of factory HP ratings.

Please note: The race Hemi was also rated at 425 HP. This should raise a few eyebrows.

It may be that the advertised specs. were close to reality, as others have noted, these were gross HP ratings. Here is a good primer reagrding gross versus net HP ratings.

Here is a cool paragraph from the page:

"Gross output, which in the U.S. is typically measured using the methodology laid out in SAE standards J245 and J1996, is the output of a ‘bare’ engine running on a test stand with no engine-driven accessories (e.g., generator/alternator or oil pump), free-flowing exhaust headers with no mufflers, and optimal ignition timing. Gross ratings are also mathematically corrected for standard atmospheric conditions. In other words, gross output represents a particular engine’s maximum output under ideal conditions."

Yes, the page is brand X centric, but the principles are sound.

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: Cab_Burge] #2115501
07/22/16 02:10 PM
07/22/16 02:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440 Offline
super stock
sr4440  Offline
super stock

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 715
Central TEXAS!!!!
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
I built and dyno tested a stock stroke 440(446 C.I.) +.030 bore size 6 pak motor using forged TRW 6 pak pistons with LY rods and a little bit bigger cam, it was a street motor on pump gas with stock 906 heads and under 9.5 to 1 compression for the pump gas back then. It made 470 HP at 5400 RPM and , if I'm remembering corrrectly still, also more torque than HP shruggy
As fas as the factory going from gross HP at the flywheel with no accessorys to net HP with all the accessorys hooked up that was to lower the HP ratings for insurance rates devilscope shruggy I think GM started lowering the compression ratio in 1971 on all thier performance packages also, not sure about Ford. Mopar followed in 1972 whiney shruggy


@ 5400 rpm it would of had 457 lbs ft of torque.


Without Data, you’re just another guy with an opinion.
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: sr4440] #2115527
07/22/16 02:45 PM
07/22/16 02:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,269
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,269
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By sr4440
Originally Posted By Cab_Burge
I built and dyno tested a stock stroke 440(446 C.I.) +.030 bore size 6 pak motor using forged TRW 6 pak pistons with LY rods and a little bit bigger cam, it was a street motor on pump gas with stock 906 heads and under 9.5 to 1 compression for the pump gas back then. It made 470 HP at 5400 RPM and , if I'm remembering corrrectly still, also more torque than HP shruggy
As fas as the factory going from gross HP at the flywheel with no accessorys to net HP with all the accessorys hooked up that was to lower the HP ratings for insurance rates devilscope shruggy I think GM started lowering the compression ratio in 1971 on all thier performance packages also, not sure about Ford. Mopar followed in 1972 whiney shruggy


@ 5400 rpm it would of had 457 lbs ft of torque.
Me thinks you are using theorys and formulas for your estimate, not real world expereinces shruggy The last 30 or more stock stroke 440 motors I've built and dyno tested with pump gas and less than 10.5 to 1 compression ratio all made more torque than HP. The cam, intake, carb size and headers all affect the motor and what it does and makes on HP and torque work On all of the low compression Stroker pump gas B and RB motors I've tested had the same results with either iron or aluminum heads shruggy My first 400 pump gas iron 906 headed stroker six pak motor made 612 HP at 5500 RPM and 644 Ft lbs at 4500 RPM on California 91 octane pump swill shock boogie It ran faster in the car at the track shifting it at or above 7000 RPM work So much for the theory of shifting it at or slightly above peak HP work

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 07/22/16 02:48 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2115579
07/22/16 03:39 PM
07/22/16 03:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
DrCharles Offline
master
DrCharles  Offline
master

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,220
West Plains, MO
Quote:
It made 470 HP at 5400 RPM and , if I'm remembering corrrectly still, also more torque than HP

@ 5400 rpm it would of had 457 lbs ft of torque.

Me thinks you are using theorys and formulas for your estimate, not real world expereinces


Chill everyone. Cab didn't say at what RPM it made "more torque than HP". To me that just means it made 470 hp at some RPM, 5400, and (say) 500 ft-lb at some other, lower, RPM!

The torque and hp numbers are always the same at 5252 RPM, incidentally laugh

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2115603
07/22/16 04:01 PM
07/22/16 04:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,385
Az
69hemibeep Offline
pro stock
69hemibeep  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,385
Az
Apples and oranges This is a good read! I don't think they even took into account air density or pressure back then and it is my understanding the torque to horsepower parameters for dynos have changed twice since then. http://www.badasscars.com/index.cfm/page...=prod/prd64.htm


1969 Hemi Roadrunner 2nd owner
Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: toddinNH] #2115608
07/22/16 04:10 PM
07/22/16 04:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda Offline
Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,844
Kirkland, Washington
Originally Posted By toddinNH
[quote=493_DART]



[i]"Gross output, which in the U.S. is typically measured using the methodology laid out in SAE standards J245 and J1996, is the output of a ‘bare’ engine running on a test stand with no engine-driven accessories (e.g., generator/alternator or oil pump), .


No OIL PUMP??? That's hard to believe! Can any body confirm this? Seems kinda difficult to do for all the different configurations back in the day...

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 69hemibeep] #2115644
07/22/16 05:25 PM
07/22/16 05:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,213
Minn
S
SportF Offline
pro stock
SportF  Offline
pro stock
S

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,213
Minn
Originally Posted By 69hemibeep
Apples and oranges This is a good read! I don't think they even took into account air density or pressure back then and it is my understanding the torque to horsepower parameters for dynos have changed twice since then. http://www.badasscars.com/index.cfm/page...=prod/prd64.htm


Ram Chargers had a guy that did the atmospheric calculations when they were testing. Although the car may have run slower in the afternoon, he could calculate that it was actually a better tune.

He (I believe his name was Al) was at the Indy banquet last march at the trade show.

Now, did they use data like this in the dyno rooms? Don't know, but the Ram Chargers would know.

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: Pacnorthcuda] #2115650
07/22/16 05:36 PM
07/22/16 05:36 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,020
Pangaea
B5 Bee Offline
master
B5 Bee  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,020
Pangaea
Originally Posted By Pacnorthcuda
Originally Posted By toddinNH
[quote=493_DART]



[i]"Gross output, which in the U.S. is typically measured using the methodology laid out in SAE standards J245 and J1996, is the output of a ‘bare’ engine running on a test stand with no engine-driven accessories (e.g., generator/alternator or oil pump), .


No OIL PUMP??? That's hard to believe! Can any body confirm this? Seems kinda difficult to do for all the different configurations back in the day...


No oil pump also means no need for oil and the windage it creates!
I'm sure he meant WP.

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: B5 Bee] #2115665
07/22/16 06:00 PM
07/22/16 06:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
In the old SAE standard there was NO accessorizes on
the engine... that later changed to what the engine
would normally have on it... alt, power steeriing and
anything else... yes it did have a oil pump running..
I dont recall if the water pump was part of the old SAE
standard... no fan either
wave

Re: Factory dyno engines [Re: 493_DART] #2115731
07/22/16 07:41 PM
07/22/16 07:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
72Swinger Offline
master
72Swinger  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
I think I remember a mag having Landy build a 70-71 426 Hemi as close to stock as possible to see what it would dyno. It either made 460,485 or 490hp. I think it was an old Car Craft and they compared the Ford Boss 429, LS6 454 and an Elephant all #'s matching resto engines.


Mopar to the bone!!!






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1