Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Would this converter be suitable? #2085733
06/04/16 08:05 AM
06/04/16 08:05 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 208
Norrland, Sweden
Swedcharger67 Offline OP
enthusiast
Swedcharger67  Offline OP
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 208
Norrland, Sweden
Due to a bad mini-starter I damaged the converter as well, and would like to know what you think would be suitable.

512 cui
12.4 static comp
about 9.2 dynamic comp
2.91 rear sure grip
TF-2 shift kit, bands and clutches beefed up, bolt-in sprague etc.
Cam is a fairly mild Lunati xxx703 (http://www.lunatipower.com/Product.aspx?id=1579&gid=362)
Stealth unported heads with 1.6 roller rockers
Mopar M1 single plane intake with E85 port injection.
Hooker 1 7/8" headers with full 2 1/2" exhaust.

Car (67 Charger) is street driven with the occasional burnout.

Do you think this converter B&M 10415 - B&M Holeshot Torque Converter would be suitable?
http://www.bmracing.com/products/10415-t...dodge-plymouth/

Or would something else be better?


Martin, 67 Charger, 512 cui, E85, MegaSquirt MS3X sequential ignition & injection
Re: Would this converter be suitable? [Re: Swedcharger67] #2086347
06/05/16 01:03 PM
06/05/16 01:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,144
wellington ohio
68-scatpack-rt Offline
In thin ice
68-scatpack-rt  Offline
In thin ice

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,144
wellington ohio
I'd call turbo action


unions....the folks who brought you the weekend!
Re: Would this converter be suitable? [Re: Swedcharger67] #2086418
06/05/16 02:29 PM
06/05/16 02:29 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
you don't say what you're using now BUT maybe upping your gear ratio would be a better bang?







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1