Re: 727's and power?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2046373
04/04/16 04:30 PM
04/04/16 04:30 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 625 Indianapolis In. usa
Quickrunner
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 625
Indianapolis In. usa
|
With an SFI Turbo case and the bolt on bell for the SBM, you are good to go. No blankets, no shields. It's also a bunch lighter than a 727. The use of the 400 allows a MUCH better converter selection. The Mopar trans are too short from the block to front pump, which severely limits the core choices that FIT. The GM spacing allows nearly unlimited choices. I THINK a 400 fits with no floor pan mods on most cars, but I am not sure. Several on this site have Turbos, maybe they will answer that. Thanks Monte for that info! Who is the go-to guy for this setup? Its going in an Abody so tunnel would probably need altered which is no big deal at this phase of the build. Also apologies to the original poster for hijacking thread
05 Ram 1500 Daytona package 71 Demon Gen3 hemi drag radial project
Missin' my 9 second 70 runner!
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2046404
04/04/16 05:15 PM
04/04/16 05:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,785 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,785
Rio Linda, CA
|
With an SFI Turbo case and the bolt on bell for the SBM, you are good to go. No blankets, no shields. It's also a bunch lighter than a 727. Another, often overlooked, advantage of the TH400 is the shifting. No matter how well built a 727 is, there is still an unavoidable overlap at the 2-3 shift while a race-prepared 400 has no overlap; to upshift you merely add another clutch...no release/apply cycle.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: Quickrunner]
#2046448
04/04/16 06:16 PM
04/04/16 06:16 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
With an SFI Turbo case and the bolt on bell for the SBM, you are good to go. No blankets, no shields. It's also a bunch lighter than a 727. The use of the 400 allows a MUCH better converter selection. The Mopar trans are too short from the block to front pump, which severely limits the core choices that FIT. The GM spacing allows nearly unlimited choices. I THINK a 400 fits with no floor pan mods on most cars, but I am not sure. Several on this site have Turbos, maybe they will answer that. Thanks Monte for that info! Who is the go-to guy for this setup? Its going in an Abody so tunnel would probably need altered which is no big deal at this phase of the build. Also apologies to the original poster for hijacking thread Rossler is an option. Not who I use, but a viable option, as is Mark Micke at M&M Transmission. Dave Klaput at Proformance Trans is a 400 guru as well. We have a PTC Turbo 400 in our radial car. They work hand in hand with Dave at Proformance on 400 stuff. A top of the line 400 is virtually indestructible, but expensive. For your needs, even with a good case, I believe you will be in a good 400 cheaper than a 727 and be a better trans. Call any of these guys and they will guide you in the right direction
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: 506RR]
#2046621
04/04/16 09:31 PM
04/04/16 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880 -
RSNOMO
Moparts Torchbearer
|
Moparts Torchbearer
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 18,880
-
|
I wouldn't hesitate to run the 727. It will live.
We ran the same 727 behind our B1 motor for 3 years, and it did not have all the parts yours has. Made about 1050-1100 with a 250 shot of Nitrous every pass in a 3400 lbs car.
Freshened it every winter. Well, I'll be dammed... Somebody not hugging brand X...
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2046693
04/04/16 11:06 PM
04/04/16 11:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448 Phoenix, AZ
MoparBilly
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
|
I am NOT trying to start an argument..........I am stating facts. At a certain HP level a 727 is NOT a good monetary investment. You have a bunch of very expensive, trick parts, in a STOCK case. You want to do that, because you are a diehard Mopar guy, that's fine, but it is NOT a wise investment. For less money going aftermarket, you get a better, lighter, more reliable, safer trans.
Somebody ponies up and builds an aftermarket 727 case and some more affordable internals, we might talk............but that probably is NOT going to happen, so it seems a moot point.
So and so has this car with one that runs high 7s.............that's fine too, but frankly these days, high 7s ain't that fast. Nobody seems to be having a problem with the twin turbo Dart guy that runs Dragweek and his car has a 400. Yeah, he broke it, BUT he also found the parts to fix it at the track. Would that have happened with a high buck 727.......likely NO I'm glad you brought that up Monte, because that's a good place to start. Matt said he ran a 727 for quite a while, and in our short conversation, he intimated that it kept showing "Hot spots in certain places", that caused him to move on to the 400. That's my point Why can't we have a grown up conversation about what is breaking, how often service is required, and what was done to prolong the problems, rather than a bunch of rhetoric from one side about "Mopar only", and rhetoric from the other side about "aftermarket transmissions". I've ran glides, and they have many shortcomings in certain applications and levels of builds. Like wise with the turbo 400, just because a Rossler 210 is working for Pro-Mods, that certainly doesn't mean every turbo 400 ever built just became bullet proof! I'd rather move the conversation away from lightweight Pro-flite stuff, and actually talk about how much of the diesel stuff can be used to make a stronger trans. I'm over my head, most of our 727s have been stock style internals with just a valve body and deep pan, but we've had cars in the high nines at 3000 to 3500lbs. and we had much longer service life with those than the typical glide in the same situation. I'm inquisitive because I like the idea of a 727 on Drag Week, versus a glide. If it was a racecar, I'd go full JW Glide in a heartbeat.
"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks"
4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: dthemi]
#2046722
04/04/16 11:36 PM
04/04/16 11:36 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 733 jacksonville,FLORIDA
slammedR/T
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 733
jacksonville,FLORIDA
|
I have to agree with Monte, so what if you use a 400 or glide trans, so long as you still run the Mopar engine it is still a MOPAR!!!!! I have a fab 9 in my truck which is... OH NO a ford based rear end, so what a Reid case 400 will be in my future when funds are right but for now I will be rocking a 727 for a while (I hope lol)
Also I'm glad to hear from others on the 727 strength as I was worried about putting a brake in it and it breaking on me first pass, I think I should be good as I don't make the power as most of you on here.
Last edited by slammedR/T; 04/04/16 11:37 PM.
2000 Dakota R/T, 408 magnum, 727, Indy heads 1000cfm 4150 carb, 93 octane fuel. motor; 10.258 @ 132.78 200 shot; 9.262 @ 144.69 racemagnum
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: MoparBilly]
#2046750
04/05/16 12:06 AM
04/05/16 12:06 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
I am NOT trying to start an argument..........I am stating facts. At a certain HP level a 727 is NOT a good monetary investment. You have a bunch of very expensive, trick parts, in a STOCK case. You want to do that, because you are a diehard Mopar guy, that's fine, but it is NOT a wise investment. For less money going aftermarket, you get a better, lighter, more reliable, safer trans.
Somebody ponies up and builds an aftermarket 727 case and some more affordable internals, we might talk............but that probably is NOT going to happen, so it seems a moot point.
So and so has this car with one that runs high 7s.............that's fine too, but frankly these days, high 7s ain't that fast. Nobody seems to be having a problem with the twin turbo Dart guy that runs Dragweek and his car has a 400. Yeah, he broke it, BUT he also found the parts to fix it at the track. Would that have happened with a high buck 727.......likely NO I'm glad you brought that up Monte, because that's a good place to start. Matt said he ran a 727 for quite a while, and in our short conversation, he intimated that it kept showing "Hot spots in certain places", that caused him to move on to the 400. That's my point Why can't we have a grown up conversation about what is breaking, how often service is required, and what was done to prolong the problems, rather than a bunch of rhetoric from one side about "Mopar only", and rhetoric from the other side about "aftermarket transmissions". I've ran glides, and they have many shortcomings in certain applications and levels of builds. Like wise with the turbo 400, just because a Rossler 210 is working for Pro-Mods, that certainly doesn't mean every turbo 400 ever built just became bullet proof! I'd rather move the conversation away from lightweight Pro-flite stuff, and actually talk about how much of the diesel stuff can be used to make a stronger trans. I'm over my head, most of our 727s have been stock style internals with just a valve body and deep pan, but we've had cars in the high nines at 3000 to 3500lbs. and we had much longer service life with those than the typical glide in the same situation. I'm inquisitive because I like the idea of a 727 on Drag Week, versus a glide. If it was a racecar, I'd go full JW Glide in a heartbeat. Like every other guy Billy, I started with a 727 and an 8.75. After breaking more 8.75s than I could count, I went to a Ford. Same with the 727. I ended up with a really good one, but I had a bunch of money in it. Then when it broke again and needed MORE money thrown at it........I moved on to other things. My reason for suggesting a 400, is because dollar for dollar spent, the 400 is a better trans. JUST talking trans. You will have to factor in driveshaft, shifter, flywheel, whatever else is required to switch. For me it boiled down to being tired of constantly breaking the 727 and having to pull it out and spend more money on it. If I was going to spend MORE, I just didn't think it was wise to keep funneling money in a trans with a stock case
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: dthemi]
#2046852
04/05/16 02:43 AM
04/05/16 02:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448 Phoenix, AZ
MoparBilly
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
|
I understand why you would suggest a turbo 400. I just feel like it might be worth it for someone who has already killed some 727s to spell out the order in which the band aids need to be applied.
I've pretty much decided that the Indy 512 lowdeck in the corner will get a tunnel ram and two foggers, and that's as much hp as I'll ever have on tap.
"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks"
4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: dthemi]
#2046866
04/05/16 03:11 AM
04/05/16 03:11 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
Assuming you have a good trans, with proper clearances and some of the shift overlap problems addressed......Some guys never get this far.......then you move on to whats going to break. First is usually the alum planet. Rings the center out. So you upgrade to the steel pinion planet. After this, it's usually the output shaft and then finally the input. So at this point you have $1100 worth of shafts in the trans, along with your $400 steel planets. Assuming you had a nice trans before, with alum drums etc, you are approaching big bucks in a factory cased trans.
My car was 3200lbs, 10.5 tire, 446" motor with a single fogger. Never had bigger than a .040 jet in it. It would 60ft in the high 1 teens. I had everybody in the world work on the trans and it had GOOD parts. It was out for SOMETHING every other race. Broken hard parts, smoked clutches.....something. I put the glide in it and it would go the season no problem. Plus was faster
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: dthemi]
#2046881
04/05/16 04:24 AM
04/05/16 04:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448 Phoenix, AZ
MoparBilly
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,448
Phoenix, AZ
|
OK, maybe I was wrong when I suggested a grown up conversation. Can I get a show of hands? How many guys tossing around opinions on this have actually had a 727, 904, C-4, C-6, Turbo 400, Turbo 350, and Glide apart on a build table and know what makes each one tick? Just wondering aloud. Forgive me if I think that has merit in this discussion.
My first Glide for my SST car was a stock case with stock 1.76 internals and a Hughes Pro Brake...darned thing nickel and dimed me to death!!
"Livin' in a powder keg and givin' off sparks"
4 Street cars, 5 Race engines
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: MoparBilly]
#2046904
04/05/16 09:00 AM
04/05/16 09:00 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330 Lynchburg, VA
Leon441
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,330
Lynchburg, VA
|
I have ran quite a few torqueflites. With power the planetary will pull the splines out. With the right valve body and band adjustment the 2-3 shift is great. And can be proven with driveshaft data. The converter is shallow as Monty mentioned. I was able to built an extremely durable 727 for less than $2,000.
Went powerglide and bought what I was told to buy and had a lot more money in it with stock case and jw bell. But, it last pretty well also with about half tge clutch life with much more line pressure than 727.
With my bellhousing business I get a lot of gm transmission builds using Reid cases. There is no comparison from a stock case to the Reid. Extremely good quality as well as the clean tunnel without sheilds. I am finding the superglide is a costly transmission plus the grand in cost of case. The turboglide will definitely give you sticker shock. But, I go with what I am told to use. I don't know what can be gotten away with. With the 727, I know whats needed and what is suggested.
I love me some old torqueflites. But even proflites make the change to a deeper converter, Montes spot on about that. And tge stock case is not blow proof. If there was a Reid quality case with a deeper converter pocket I'd recommend a torqueflite. But, there is not. With the quality of aftermarket parts if you have the funds and ability to change mounts go tge aftermarket gm based tranny. I have pump adapters for torqueflite to Reid for a reason. With a relatively low torque R5 358 the 904 is faster than any other automatic. But, awkward and junky with the necessary sheilds.
Career best 8.02 @ 169 at 3050# and 10" tires small block power.
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: MoparBilly]
#2046955
04/05/16 11:01 AM
04/05/16 11:01 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540 Milwaukee WI
TRENDZ
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,540
Milwaukee WI
|
OK, maybe I was wrong when I suggested a grown up conversation. Can I get a show of hands? How many guys tossing around opinions on this have actually had a 727, 904, C-4, C-6, Turbo 400, Turbo 350, and Glide apart on a build table and know what makes each one tick? Just wondering aloud. Forgive me if I think that has merit in this discussion.
My first Glide for my SST car was a stock case with stock 1.76 internals and a Hughes Pro Brake...darned thing nickel and dimed me to death!! When I got to the point where I was breaking the output, and twisting the input shafts, I was forced to make a decision. I talked to locals who all told me to go turbo400. I was intimately familiar with my trans by that point. I looked at some disassembled trans' at hipsters. The stock shafts in a turbo 400 are not the size of a t/f at their minimal cross section. At that point, I figured I had to buy shafts for either, so why change the car that was already set up for the t/f? I realize now that the shaft design has alot to do with the strength, along with the material. Anyway, at that time, there weren't any guys locally that could give me an example of a car comparable to mine in weight, tq and gear combo using a t400. I went the A&A T/F$$$$ route. Didn't have to change the car, and had a very reliable trans. My decision was definitely not a brand loyalty decision. Car was a gm body, chrysler engine, ford rear end and some garbage truck parts All that being said, I now would go with the t400.
"use it 'till it breaks, replace as needed"
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: MoparBilly]
#2046974
04/05/16 11:34 AM
04/05/16 11:34 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154 Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
|
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
|
I get a show of hands? How many guys tossing around opinions on this have actually had a 727, 904, C-4, C-6, Turbo 400, Turbo 350, and Glide apart on a build table and know what makes each one tick? Just wondering aloud. Forgive me if I think that has merit in this discussion.
Never had those on the table, but, my 727 broke on relatively low hp. Never blew a 904. Buddy's Turbo 400 aka never fails. I've puked a turbo 350. Stock glide damn near bulletproof but HEAVY for a 2-speed. C4/C6/FMX is absolute garbage, as my buddies 67 stang can attest too. But by far the strongest tranny I ever seen was a stock 4L80e. Any stock tranny that lives behind a 1000+hp Truck deserves respect. Next 360 I do is getting the 4L60e (same bellhousing as a turbo 350/400). That said I understand the purest who wants to run only Mopar parts and that's great! But I never had a guy look under mt cars to see what trans I'm running. And if they do and complain.. well buy it and put whatever you want.
Last edited by Ice~Eagle; 04/05/16 11:38 AM.
When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
|
|
|
Re: 727's and power?
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2046992
04/05/16 11:59 AM
04/05/16 11:59 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
You guys that are breaking the cases.. what is breaking on the cases.. is it the tail shaft or what(I'm not talking about blowing a drum to blow the case)... and what king of set up are you running as in front, mid plates and what trans mount.. I myself never run a solid trans mount ever
|
|
|
|
|