Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: R70RUNNER]
#2023960
03/03/16 06:14 PM
03/03/16 06:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
|
915s would be a great option but seems most availble for sale now have been coated in gold and painted orange, blue, or cast iron color. $1200 for someone's 50yr old maybe they're good castings that are still gonna have to be checked is too rich for me. I sold a set that were cores about a yr ago for $275 , I must have let them go to cheap ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: WO23Coronet]
#2023966
03/03/16 06:18 PM
03/03/16 06:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
|
What's wrong with KB162 pistons? Never used them just curious They are too far down in the hole and have a HUGE valve canyon , err , valve relief. If you don't have a head with close to 80cc chamber and deck the block to bring them up in the bore you end up with less than 9.0 compression. By the time you pay for all that machining you could have just bought a piston wit ha higher compression height. The speedpro LF2315 is a good piston but it's HEAVY and it has no valve reliefs. The best choice for a 383 is the Diamond piston , but it could stand to be a little taller CH than it is , the good thing is you can have that adjusted by them for not a lot of dough.
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: Tommy The Chryco]
#2024277
03/04/16 03:08 AM
03/04/16 03:08 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861 Riverside, Ca
R70RUNNER
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861
Riverside, Ca
|
I guess so John, seems bare cores are $500, complete 1000+, and I've lately seen fresh rebuilt at 1800... Gulp! Free to ask what you want for your stuff but dang! Maybe geographical too as out west the stuff is harder to find and people seem proud of it. I'll second what John said on the 162's as my experience as well. Pin is high, relief is claimed as 5cc but looks bigger. Never checked it. Diamond is 4cc and looks more reasonable in size. Plus hypers are fragile, maybe stronger than cast but glass is stronger than aluminum but when it breaks it makes a big mess. The hypers are perfect for a low CR cruiser build, but if your going to push them the risk of detonation shattering one and sending the shrapnel through the engine is unappealing too. I know they're using them in z06 vettes but they're computer controlled most bbm are not. Plus if you ever get a wild hare nitrous is a no-no too.
Current cars: 2000 Dak Quad Cab, 2012 Challenger,1970 Road Runner, 1994 Firehawk
1966 Coronet post sedan, 1988 Corvette, 2005 Magnum RT all SOLD
R70RUNNER<---VP Inland Empire Chapter of the MPM
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: JohnRR]
#2025099
03/05/16 04:40 PM
03/05/16 04:40 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,507 Royersford, PA
bschargerse
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,507
Royersford, PA
|
What's wrong with KB162 pistons? Never used them just curious They are too far down in the hole and have a HUGE valve canyon , err , valve relief. If you don't have a head with close to 80cc chamber and deck the block to bring them up in the bore you end up with less than 9.0 compression. By the time you pay for all that machining you could have just bought a piston wit ha higher compression height. The speedpro LF2315 is a good piston but it's HEAVY and it has no valve reliefs. The best choice for a 383 is the Diamond piston , but it could stand to be a little taller CH than it is , the good thing is you can have that adjusted by them for not a lot of dough. JohnRR, I'm curious. Would you recommend Diamond make them with a 1.932 CH? (I think they are 1.916 standard). The way I see it is that the block could be squared, and maybe not have to be decked a lot or at all, to bring the CR into a reasonable ratio with a closed chambered head. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Brian - 1971 Dodge Challenger "The Dodge, which was practically stock, just left the Mustang like you wouldn't believe."
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: Tommy The Chryco]
#2025467
03/06/16 02:10 AM
03/06/16 02:10 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587 IL . usa
cjs69mope
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 587
IL . usa
|
kb 400 is a good pistion but block still needs to be deck cut. the dome is so small it is not much higher than flat top. 5cc.
1969 Dodge Charger
1969 Dodge Superbee
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: bschargerse]
#2026414
03/07/16 12:50 PM
03/07/16 12:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
|
What's wrong with KB162 pistons? Never used them just curious They are too far down in the hole and have a HUGE valve canyon , err , valve relief. If you don't have a head with close to 80cc chamber and deck the block to bring them up in the bore you end up with less than 9.0 compression. By the time you pay for all that machining you could have just bought a piston wit ha higher compression height. The speedpro LF2315 is a good piston but it's HEAVY and it has no valve reliefs. The best choice for a 383 is the Diamond piston , but it could stand to be a little taller CH than it is , the good thing is you can have that adjusted by them for not a lot of dough. JohnRR, I'm curious. Would you recommend Diamond make them with a 1.932 CH? (I think they are 1.916 standard). The way I see it is that the block could be squared, and maybe not have to be decked a lot or at all, to bring the CR into a reasonable ratio with a closed chambered head. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Square the block FIRST , once you know what the deck height is, and mock it up with the crank and rods you plan to use you can decide what CH you actually need and tell Diamond what you want. Their piston comes with a 5cc valve relief , the set I had done got a 3cc relief because I wanted a little something incase I changed my mind ... again ... and put in a cam that wasn't stock. The good thing with Diamond is you can get a piston that isn't really available , I needed a .040 piston because of prior machine shop screw ups. I ended up with their 1.916 piston also because of 2 different shops screwing up when squaring the block. I'm probably the only person on the planet that has $5k into a STOCK build 383 short block ...
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: Tommy The Chryco]
#2026680
03/07/16 07:16 PM
03/07/16 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,507 Royersford, PA
bschargerse
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,507
Royersford, PA
|
Thanks for the info. Sorry for the hi-jack.
Brian - 1971 Dodge Challenger "The Dodge, which was practically stock, just left the Mustang like you wouldn't believe."
|
|
|
Re: 383 magnum rebuild
[Re: Tommy The Chryco]
#2027022
03/08/16 03:15 AM
03/08/16 03:15 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861 Riverside, Ca
R70RUNNER
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,861
Riverside, Ca
|
My issue with the 162's are high pin, large valve reliefs, and if it's a performance build there's a very honest chance somewhere down the line the idea of throwing some squeeze in the mix might just come along... Nitrous and hypers is a no-no. Plus they're fragile, easy enough to knock the top land off with detonation. Just better choices... You can change a engine around pretty easy but piston, rods and crank selection are pretty much married to the initial build. Choose wisely.
Current cars: 2000 Dak Quad Cab, 2012 Challenger,1970 Road Runner, 1994 Firehawk
1966 Coronet post sedan, 1988 Corvette, 2005 Magnum RT all SOLD
R70RUNNER<---VP Inland Empire Chapter of the MPM
|
|
|
|
|