Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Cam for a 512 #2016696
02/21/16 05:24 PM
02/21/16 05:24 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Thought I had better start my own thread before I mess up another one.

I need to make a decision on a cam for my combo. The one I have might be just fine, and I've contacted a few cam grinders and received back two very different cam recommendations.

My combo is a 68 roadrunner, 3600 lbs with me in it, 3.91 gears, what should be a 4500 stall 9.5" converter, 512 low deck, 10.8 compression, Indy s/r heads with max wedge ports currently getting worked on at M&M, Indy single plane, AED 1000 hp. The cam I have now is a solid roller single pattern 292 adv 261@50 .648 lift on a 108 l/c installed at 104. The intended use here is street strip, hence the low compression and modest gearing. I only drive it in good weather and don't go too terribly far with it. I just want it to go as fast as possible at the track and I'm not too concerned with street manners. If I have to do maintenance on it every year, that's ok with me.

The first cam that was recommended was a solid roller 276&50 .660 lift intake, 284&50 .664 lift exhaust on a 112 L/c they didn't say where they wanted the cl to be.
the second one was another solid roller 263&50 .675 lift intake 269&50 .650 lift exhaust on a 108 l/c installed at 104.

Quite a bit different I would think. What would you guys do here ?


Last edited by Roadrunner451; 02/21/16 06:02 PM.
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2016702
02/21/16 05:35 PM
02/21/16 05:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,050
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,050
Oregon
Your current cam seems fine to me for 512 inches with 10.8 compression. I wouldn't go much bigger that is for sure. The 263/269 cam that someone recommended for you would also work if your valve springs are good for the extra lift but I really doubt you would see enough difference to justify the cost of switching.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2016732
02/21/16 06:34 PM
02/21/16 06:34 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Thanks Andy, this is was what I thought to begin with, but it can't hurt to ask about these things while it's still on the engine stand. The cam I have now was what was recommended by muscle motors a long time ago for my 451.

Since the heads are off of it and in the shop. Maybe I could have them shaved a bit more to get the compression up. the 10.8 seems to limit what I can do.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2016850
02/21/16 09:28 PM
02/21/16 09:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,050
Oregon
A
AndyF Offline
I Win
AndyF  Offline
I Win
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,050
Oregon
Well at 10.8 you should be able to run pump premium. If you go much higher than that then you need to mix in race gas which gets to be expensive and a hassle. You'll be somewhere in the 650 hp range with your current engine which is pretty respectable. Not a lot of 650 hp pump gas cars cruising around so I'd put it together and run it.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: AndyF] #2016945
02/21/16 11:10 PM
02/21/16 11:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,228
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,228
Bend,OR USA
Originally Posted By AndyF
Your current cam seems fine to me for 512 inches with 10.8 compression. I wouldn't go much bigger that is for sure. The 263/269 cam that someone recommended for you would also work if your valve springs are good for the extra lift but I really doubt you would see enough difference to justify the cost of switching.
iagree up My 517 C.I.(4.300 stroke in a 400 block) pump gas 3450 lb Duster with a similar motor and heads ran bottom tens(10.001) and high nines on Oregon 91 octane pump gas through the 3 inch exhaust at Wodburn Or. in the summer boogie That cam was a Com Cams with 260@.050 and .420 lobe lift on the intake side, 266 @.050 with .409 lobe lift on the exhausts side with a set of Harland Sharp 1.65 ratio rockers boogie Try changing one thing at a time so you can see real world results on your own up Let us know what they are also work

Last edited by Cab_Burge; 02/21/16 11:11 PM.

Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017136
02/22/16 03:04 AM
02/22/16 03:04 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Ok then, well I guess I'll keep the cam I have for now. I think I'm still going to look into getting my dynamic compression up to about 8.5 though.

I think the first change I would make is higher ratio rockers.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017143
02/22/16 03:09 AM
02/22/16 03:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Have you run the eng with the cam thats in it and if so how does it run ? Ron

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017148
02/22/16 03:16 AM
02/22/16 03:16 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
Ok then, well I guess I'll keep the cam I have for now. I think I'm still going to look into getting my dynamic compression up to about 8.5 though.

I think the first change I would make is higher ratio rockers.


How much is it raced VS street driving.. have
you done a compression test.. what is it... I
wouldnt waste the money on a new cam.. your
very close now
wave

Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 02/22/16 03:17 AM.
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017151
02/22/16 03:22 AM
02/22/16 03:22 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.

I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: MR_P_BODY] #2017156
02/22/16 03:26 AM
02/22/16 03:26 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
Ok then, well I guess I'll keep the cam I have for now. I think I'm still going to look into getting my dynamic compression up to about 8.5 though.

I think the first change I would make is higher ratio rockers.


How much is it raced VS street driving.. have
you done a compression test.. what is it... I
wouldnt waste the money on a new cam.. your
very close now
wave


I would say about 60/40 street to track. My house is literally 5 minutes away from the front gate at IRP.

No, haven't done a compression check.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017159
02/22/16 03:27 AM
02/22/16 03:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.

I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this.


Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track
I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a
lot
wave

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: MR_P_BODY] #2017163
02/22/16 03:33 AM
02/22/16 03:33 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.

I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this.


Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track
I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a
lot
wave


I don't have a time slip in front of me, and where they are now is a bit of a mystery.....getting married means not knowing where your stuff is now apparently. But as remember it was 1.65. It didn't dead hook.

Didn't miles an hour all that great either.
11.48 at 118.5

Last edited by Roadrunner451; 02/22/16 03:42 AM.
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017227
02/22/16 09:14 AM
02/22/16 09:14 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,316
Prospect, PA
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
I did run it when it was a 451. It seemed ok then. No problems really and I drove the heck out of it on the street. Was a bit of a disappointment at the track, but it had other issues. Lets just say finding a good shop is not always easy.

I was just reading some of the things posted in Tex's 505 thread, and thought that perhaps a bit more cam would work out well for me, as now would be the time to do it. It's good to get feed back from people much more experienced with this.


Since it was a bit of disappointment at the track
I would ask what was your 60' time.. that tells a
lot
wave


I don't have a time slip in front of me, and where they are now is a bit of a mystery.....getting married means not knowing where your stuff is now apparently. But as remember it was 1.65. It didn't dead hook.

Didn't miles an hour all that great either.
11.48 at 118.5


Something does not seem right. Seems like you might have another problem that you should find before replacing the cam.

Last edited by BSB67; 02/22/16 09:19 AM.
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017358
02/22/16 01:56 PM
02/22/16 01:56 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Yes, for sure. This is a new motor though, not the one that ran the 11.48. I'd like to get this one right so I don't have another underachiever.

Besides issues with the exhaust (3" pipe attached directly to the 3 1/2" collector, poor muffler choice) the dynamic compression was pretty low 7.35. I don't remember what the cranking compression was, that was a while ago. The carb was on the small side too.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017362
02/22/16 02:00 PM
02/22/16 02:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,506
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,506
So. Burlington, Vt.
There isn't quite enough info to tell if you could/should run more cam than you have now or not.
Primarily, header size and the make up of the exhaust system.

My preference is to build to a targeted goal, then work towards that end.
As long as the goals and budget are on the same page, I find that to be a better way to approach it.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: fast68plymouth] #2017373
02/22/16 02:20 PM
02/22/16 02:20 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
There isn't quite enough info to tell if you could/should run more cam than you have now or not.
Primarily, header size and the make up of the exhaust system.

My preference is to build to a targeted goal, then work towards that end.
As long as the goals and budget are on the same page, I find that to be a better way to approach it.


The headers are the TTI step headers for Indy heads. 2"x2 1/8" into a 3 1/2" collector. That goes into a Dr.Gas 3 1/2" X pipe that reduces down to 3" after the X. Then it's to the biggest case 3" Magnaflows and then it's 3" mandrel bent over the axle to the back of the car.

I really don't have a set time I want to see, so I'm probably not approaching this the right way. I just want fast within the limits of pump gas and 3.91 rear gears, and I can go to e85 as that's pretty easy to get here.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017429
02/22/16 03:29 PM
02/22/16 03:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,506
So. Burlington, Vt.
F
fast68plymouth Offline
I Live Here
fast68plymouth  Offline
I Live Here
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,506
So. Burlington, Vt.
Without a specific goal in mind, about the best I can offer is the cam you have is appropriately sized for pump gas and 3.91 gears.
Since you already own it, I'd just try it and see if it runs well enough for you to be satisfied.


68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123
Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Roadrunner451] #2017432
02/22/16 03:35 PM
02/22/16 03:35 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,318
State of confusion
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
Yes, for sure. This is a new motor though, not the one that ran the 11.48. I'd like to get this one right so I don't have another underachiever.

Besides issues with the exhaust (3" pipe attached directly to the 3 1/2" collector, poor muffler choice) the dynamic compression was pretty low 7.35. I don't remember what the cranking compression was, that was a while ago. The carb was on the small side too.


What carb...........that can make or break good 60`s and overall driveability............


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: fast68plymouth] #2017450
02/22/16 03:46 PM
02/22/16 03:46 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Originally Posted By fast68plymouth
Without a specific goal in mind, about the best I can offer is the cam you have is appropriately sized for pump gas and 3.91 gears.
Since you already own it, I'd just try it and see if it runs well enough for you to be satisfied.


That makes sense. The general consensus seems to be run what I already have as it's not bad, make sure everything else is good, see how it runs and go from there.

So that's what I'll do. I will be checking where this cam is installed at as I don't trust anyone anymore.

Re: Cam for a 512 [Re: Thumperdart] #2017453
02/22/16 03:49 PM
02/22/16 03:49 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
R
Roadrunner451 Offline OP
member
Roadrunner451  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Indianapolis
Originally Posted By Thumperdart
Originally Posted By Roadrunner451
Yes, for sure. This is a new motor though, not the one that ran the 11.48. I'd like to get this one right so I don't have another underachiever.

Besides issues with the exhaust (3" pipe attached directly to the 3 1/2" collector, poor muffler choice) the dynamic compression was pretty low 7.35. I don't remember what the cranking compression was, that was a while ago. The carb was on the small side too.


What carb...........that can make or break good 60`s and overall driveability............


On that 451 motor I ran an old Holley 950 HP, which I still have. I also have a Quickfuel 950 with downleg boosters, and an AED 1000Hp with their new wazoo annulars.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1