Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) #1967785
12/11/15 03:56 PM
12/11/15 03:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
W
Wildjones Offline OP
member
Wildjones  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
Hey folks,
I am evaluating my options for my mild 496" stroker and can provide motor details if relevant to my questions...

Can anyone tell me if the CFM of a TBI EFI system should be equal to that of the carburetor it is replacing? I'm eying the Fast EZ 2.0 kit and Fitech offerings right now, but trying to gather info. Fast TB is 1000 cfm whereas the Fitech GO Efi 8 is 900cfm. Is cfm from efi to carb an apples to apples comparison?

Fitech is looking real appealing right now, but I am wondering if the CFM will starve my engine.

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1967806
12/11/15 04:21 PM
12/11/15 04:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Neither will starve your engine unless it is truly something special.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1967819
12/11/15 04:34 PM
12/11/15 04:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
W
Wildjones Offline OP
member
Wildjones  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
Alright, how about a slightly more specific question? Does anyone know if an Edelbrock 440 Victor EFI intake manifold will fit underneath a stock '70 Cuda hood with a fast/fitech style throttle body on top and air filter?

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1967848
12/11/15 06:04 PM
12/11/15 06:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
First, TBI should flow the same or more as the carb you would have chosen.

The FITech style throttle bodies appear to be close in height to a carb, about 4". An edelbrock victor intake is about 1/4" or so taller than a performer RPM intake, which guys are getting to fit with drop base air cleaners.

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #1967861
12/11/15 06:39 PM
12/11/15 06:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
W
Wildjones Offline OP
member
Wildjones  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
Originally Posted By DaytonaTurbo
First, TBI should flow the same or more as the carb you would have chosen.

The FITech style throttle bodies appear to be close in height to a carb, about 4". An edelbrock victor intake is about 1/4" or so taller than a performer RPM intake, which guys are getting to fit with drop base air cleaners.

Daytona Turbo,

Thank you for the reply. That was my concern. I was looking at both the Fitech Go Efi 8 and then their MeanStreet Efi for 800hp (similar to the Go EFI 8, but without timing control and support for power adders - unneeded for my application). I *think* Ken said that the MeanStreet throttle body and the Go EFI 8 was 850CFM. They have a Multiport system coming out that is a 900CFM throttle body that wouldn't cost much more than their EFI 8 kit. I could be all backwards at this point witht he CFM numbers though.

Originally I was looking at Fast EZ Efi 2.0, but all the horror stories had me second guessing that option. Whether its due to installer error or something else, I'm not sure?

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1967871
12/11/15 07:19 PM
12/11/15 07:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
J
Jerry Offline
master
Jerry  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
I would go with the largest throttle body offered. air flow shouldn't be your limiting factor. its important in a carb only to get the fuel flowing out of the bowls. in an efi system, the injectors fire no matter what so don't limit your HP potential and get a small throttle body. also you have a 496, I don't know if I would run a dominator on there at 2000 cfm if you want to drive it on the street. you could even get away with a 1200cfm version. any larger than that and part throttle driveability will suffer.


Superior Design Concepts
2574 Elliott Dr
Troy MI 48083
jerry@sdconcepts.com
www.sdconcepts.com
Facebook page: Superior Design Concepts
www.bcrproducts.com
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Jerry] #1967937
12/11/15 09:09 PM
12/11/15 09:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
Originally Posted By Jerry
I would go with the largest throttle body offered. air flow shouldn't be your limiting factor. its important in a carb only to get the fuel flowing out of the bowls. in an efi system, the injectors fire no matter what so don't limit your HP potential and get a small throttle body. also you have a 496, I don't know if I would run a dominator on there at 2000 cfm if you want to drive it on the street. you could even get away with a 1200cfm version. any larger than that and part throttle driveability will suffer.


It is possible to go too big with EFI just like you can on a carbed engine.

When I moved the turbo 440 from a factory Cobra throttle body to the 1600 cfm Accufab I felt a distinct loss of throttle response.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1968033
12/11/15 11:05 PM
12/11/15 11:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
Grizzly Offline
Moparts Proctologist
Grizzly  Offline
Moparts Proctologist

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
Originally Posted By Wildjones


Can anyone tell me if the CFM of a TBI EFI system should be equal to that of the carburetor it is replacing?


I heard from a couple of sources when EFI was showing up on production vehicles that EFI had to run larger CFM throttle bodies to be equal with a carb.

I know when snowmobiles and motorcycles went to EFI it was the same thing: 46mm throttle bodies to replace 38 to 40mm carbs.

Take that for what its' worth, and perhaps things have changed. shruggy


Mo' Farts

Moderated by "tbagger".
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1968193
12/12/15 02:51 AM
12/12/15 02:51 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,431
Dandridge TN
D
Dabee Offline
master
Dabee  Offline
master
D

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,431
Dandridge TN
Originally Posted By Wildjones
Originally Posted By DaytonaTurbo
First, TBI should flow the same or more as the carb you would have chosen.

The FITech style throttle bodies appear to be close in height to a carb, about 4". An edelbrock victor intake is about 1/4" or so taller than a performer RPM intake, which guys are getting to fit with drop base air cleaners.

Daytona Turbo,

Thank you for the reply. That was my concern. I was looking at both the Fitech Go Efi 8 and then their MeanStreet Efi for 800hp (similar to the Go EFI 8, but without timing control and support for power adders - unneeded for my application). I *think* Ken said that the MeanStreet throttle body and the Go EFI 8 was 850CFM. They have a Multiport system coming out that is a 900CFM throttle body that wouldn't cost much more than their EFI 8 kit. I could be all backwards at this point witht he CFM numbers though.

Originally I was looking at Fast EZ Efi 2.0, but all the horror stories had me second guessing that option. Whether its due to installer error or something else, I'm not sure?


I have the Fast 2.0 on my 512 stroker street engine. It runs great. I have put close to 2,000 miles on it so are and have had no problems with it. I believe most of the horror stories you have heard about are due to installation errors.

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1968515
12/12/15 06:33 PM
12/12/15 06:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482
Lake Orion, MI
goldduster318 Offline
pro stock
goldduster318  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,482
Lake Orion, MI
I have an MPFI system on my 340 and I'm using a Super Victor EFI manifold and a Holley 1000 cfm throttle body that's carb flange. The throttle response is great, even though it has non-progressive linkage.


'70 Duster 470hp 340/T56 Magnum/8 3/4 3.23 Sure-Grip
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: goldduster318] #1969472
12/14/15 03:13 PM
12/14/15 03:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
W
Wildjones Offline OP
member
Wildjones  Offline OP
member
W

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
Originally Posted By goldduster318
I have an MPFI system on my 340 and I'm using a Super Victor EFI manifold and a Holley 1000 cfm throttle body that's carb flange. The throttle response is great, even though it has non-progressive linkage.


Thanks for the reply! I guess I need to figure out if I could even fit that intake under the hood with a big block. Still not too sure about the cfm between the two systems, but it sounds like it's an apples to oranges comparison, unless I misunderstood the prior replies.

Any one else have any positive experiences with the Fast 2.0 system and/or any installation tips?

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1969487
12/14/15 03:37 PM
12/14/15 03:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,873
Ontario, Canada
S
Stanton Offline
Don't question me!
Stanton  Offline
Don't question me!
S

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,873
Ontario, Canada
Forget about the CFM of the throttle body and look at what HP the system will support. The number and size of the injectors is more of a determining factor as well as the pump volume to support the injector size.

Case in point, "I believe" the FAST EFI throttle bodies are the same size for the EZ efi and the 2.0 systems - but the 2.0 uses 4 more injectors to up the HP handling capacity. Likewise with the FiTech systems.

If you want the RIGHT answers, you should ask "moparrich" who is a member here and the FAST EFI guru http://www.fastmanefi.com/

Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Wildjones] #1969641
12/14/15 07:11 PM
12/14/15 07:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
J
Jerry Offline
master
Jerry  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,988
Warren, MI
the fast efi system is good. for your size of an engine you can use a large throttle body.

in a carb because of the venturi effect of drawing in fuel, you have to limit the cfm so you get good atomization and a strong signal to pull fuel from the bowls.

in efi you don't have to worry about this as the injectors will atomize the fuel and deliver the proper amount not matter what cfm your throttle body is.

in terms of cfm:
1. small cfm will limit horsepower and give really good throttle response
2. too large of cfm will not add any more hp than your engine can put out, but part throttle drivability may suffer as well as fuel mileage.
3. the just right zone. good throttle response, just enough cfm to not limit hp, with tuning can achieve decent mileage.

yes on fuel injected engine, the injector size is more critical than throttle body cfm. to large of injectors, and your low rpm will suffer, as well as driveability. too small and you lose hp and can run lean.


Superior Design Concepts
2574 Elliott Dr
Troy MI 48083
jerry@sdconcepts.com
www.sdconcepts.com
Facebook page: Superior Design Concepts
www.bcrproducts.com
Re: Carb CFM vs TBI CFM (vs TB MPFI CFM) [Re: Jerry] #1969868
12/15/15 12:53 AM
12/15/15 12:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
I run an XFI system on a B 496 in a '70 Challenger with flat hood. With the short throttle body, M1 single plane and mild drop base air cleaner, it just fits. I believe the standard Cuda hood is bulged which should help clearance... still the Victor is higher, the RB is higher and with a taller TBI throttle body not sure it will fit. With a short port injection TB it probably would fit.

As many have posted, going bigger (to a point) on the TB does not hurt drivability with FI like it does with a carb. My non progressive throttle body has great throttle response... almost too good. Crack the throttle at lower RPM, all 4 barrels open and you are moving. A progressive TB would be smoother and also easier to tune the acceleration enrichment.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1