Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Very poor fuel economy #1921043
09/28/15 07:59 AM
09/28/15 07:59 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
When I got my '77 Aspen (318 auto) it didn't run all that well. Went through the usual maintenance, replacing all fluids and consumables. New spark plugs, ignition module, cables and even a brand new Firecore distributor. Set it up with a timing light at 10* BTDC and had a pro double check on my installation.
Decided the old Carter BBD had seen better days and replaced it with a reman unit to keep things simple. Well, I now get around 5 mpg in town. Terrible for a daily driver!

First place to look would be the carb and it is running slightly rich but when setting it up I used both a Colortune spark plug and my vacuum gauge and it seemed to run well. Leaning it out certainly didn't help, car would immediately start running rough and eventually die. Vacuum was a tad low at 16 inHg but remained stable (worn rings?)

I plan to eliminate most of the EGR stuff as it may be causing a vacuum leak and it's not required anyway but I'm a bit lost where all that fuel might be going. It's not leaking from the tank, that's for sure!

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921058
09/28/15 08:59 AM
09/28/15 08:59 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,728
places
7
79powerwagon Offline
Too Many Posts
79powerwagon  Offline
Too Many Posts
7

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,728
places
Carter BBD is a horrible carburetor at best, and it gets worse as they age. Re-manufactured ones don't really help the issue.Just throw it to the bottom of the ocean as fish habitat, where it belongs. wink

Make certain your choke system is working correctly. Make certain you have no vacuum leaks. Make certain your distributor is installed correctly and the plug wires are in proper sequence. Make sure your ignition timing is spot on.

And what does your vacuum gauge say? (Thank you for using one!)

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921059
09/28/15 09:01 AM
09/28/15 09:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,588
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,588
Freeport IL USA
Which Ignition system is on your Aspen? Is it a Lean Burn? If the egr is functioning, removing it may cost you more gas mileage! Was the car designed with a converter that is no longer present?

Have you looked at all the fuel lines for signs of leaks? Old hoses & new gas don't mix well.

A reman carb does not necessarily mean it was rebuilt correctly, Ive seen some really wore out carbs that have been rebuild that still have worn throttle bushings and poor quality work. These carbs are rebuilt from 30 year old (or more) cores. Slapping a kit and a new float in them does not mean they are rebuilt, which is all a lot of reman shops are doing these days.

I don't know how things were set up over where your at, but here in the states, a 77 would probably have a lock up trans. They were really bad at being set up incorrectly and some would lock up as soon as the car shifted into drive. Coupled with really high rear end gears (2:45 was not unheard of) and the trans locking up at 20-25 mph, people would tend to step harder into the gas to maintain city speeds, making poor city gas mileage. Gene

Last edited by poorboy; 09/28/15 09:05 AM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921060
09/28/15 09:08 AM
09/28/15 09:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
Did a simple pressure test on the engine btw, seems ok given its age and vintage*
I think:



That's

1 - 121 psi
2 - 139 psi
3 - 133 psi
4 - 121 psi
5 - 124 psi
6 - 142 psi
7 - 121 psi
8 - 133 psi


*low comp smog era engines

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921062
09/28/15 09:12 AM
09/28/15 09:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
Lock up and lean burn came in '78 AFAIK. Asked my mechanic about the sure grip rear end and he told me it had a 2.60 ratio. Not sure what to make of that, could be either 2.75 or 2.45 I guess.

It does have a catalytic converter, single exhaust setup that's next on my list. Pretty rusty, had it welded for the time being but wants replacing really.

Last edited by rory73; 09/28/15 09:17 AM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921063
09/28/15 09:27 AM
09/28/15 09:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
I'm aware of the Carter's reputation, thought I'd give it a try first though. That way I didn't have to worry about getting linkage adapters and whathave you. Cost 140 $ from Rockauto and looks okay. Fuel economy or lack of was more or less the same with my original carb btw.
Guess I'll go back to checking the ignition first.

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921066
09/28/15 09:34 AM
09/28/15 09:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
Ignition kit from Jeg's that I installed, kept the 4 prong BR though. Haven't messed with the adjustable distributor yet as it's such a PITA to get at. Should be okay for a stock application really.



Quote:
JEGS Performance Products 40500K1 - JEGS Mopar Electronic Ignition Conversion Kits with Forged Distributors Details

Electronic Ignition - Complete Kit


Includes:
Forged Distributor with Vacuum & Mechanical Advance 555-40500
HiRev-7500 ECU 555-40805
Wiring Harness 555-40801
Ballast Resistor 555-40103
HP Coil 555-40105
Spark Plug Wires 555-40250


Also planning to replace the presumably original nylon timing gear, maybe the harmonic balacer too.

Last edited by rory73; 09/28/15 09:38 AM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921088
09/28/15 10:53 AM
09/28/15 10:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Years ago I bought a 72 Dart that got horrible mileage, went thru all the stuff you did but the engine had a fresh remanufactured carb on it when I bought it.

Turns out that reman carb had jets 8 sizes too big. Once I put the right jets in mileage more than doubled.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: Supercuda] #1921171
09/28/15 01:32 PM
09/28/15 01:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
I have one of those Colortune plugs! I would put in a new timing chain set with the 3 keyways and adv it 4 deg. your compression readings are OK (thanks for converting from bars to psi, I was worried for a bit!) so the longblock is OK. 73/74 was a bad period for discombobulated timing/jetting as Ma was trying to meet gov't regs plus there was the fuel crisis of that era but '75 & up was much better so I think there is something else going on. I would do the tchain plus possibly a new mileage cam to build some DCR, confirm no vac leak. blockoff or unhook/cap the vac lines to the egr thingamajig. that carb may have no ported nipple so tune the dist for manifold. confirm the choke operation is good. holler how it turns out


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921178
09/28/15 01:53 PM
09/28/15 01:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
P
Paul_Fancsali Offline
master
Paul_Fancsali  Offline
master
P

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,931
Intake manifold is probably carbon plugged at the heat riser passage Most carter stink fuel mileage wise. Make sure the car is heating up enough that will really make a difference in gas mileage around town. Don't be too hasty in tossing the emission stuff especially the egr The convertor can also be a real source of problem so toss it probably plugged any way.

I currently have several carters and a new cat that would probably fit that car Just a fyi. Run a 195 stat and check the heat passage. My Dart I had 113K and would stall and get terrible gas mileage Took off intake cleaned heat passage rebuilt carter 2bbl and avg over 16 mpg in town 22 on road

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921202
09/28/15 02:39 PM
09/28/15 02:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
My first thoughts were a plugged cat and a stuck heat riser flap in the exhaust manifold.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921367
09/28/15 06:45 PM
09/28/15 06:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
Interesting comment regarding the intake manifold. I was thinking of swapping in a clean pre-EGR manifold that I picked up for next to nothing. Using a heavy cast iron intake when I also have an aluminium Performer (318/360 4-bbl spread bore) might be a daft idea but at least I have a carb for it.
Haven't used my vacuum gauge to check for exhaust back pressure, which I understand you can also do. Probably worth a shot.

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921823
09/29/15 03:03 PM
09/29/15 03:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Stock, the car should do way better than what you're getting. SO, I'd not start swapping parts. Buying and installing new this and thats is a sure way to spend a lot of money with possibly no return. The last few comments have been solid. First, get the stock car to run the way it was delivered, then make changes to increase performance.

R.

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: dogdays] #1921850
09/29/15 03:42 PM
09/29/15 03:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By dogdays
Stock, the car should do way better than what you're getting. SO, I'd not start swapping parts. Buying and installing new this and thats is a sure way to spend a lot of money with possibly no return. The last few comments have been solid. First, get the stock car to run the way it was delivered, then make changes to increase performance.

R.

I agree with above. What octane is your fuel there? Sound like the enrichment circuit-spring could be the problem on the carb(making it run rich all the time) or float to high and running over, about the only way you can lose mpg that much.
Should add, undo the choke and see how it runs, too cold to open all the way.

Last edited by cudaman1969; 09/29/15 03:44 PM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921941
09/29/15 06:28 PM
09/29/15 06:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
Do a 10 second check.

Pop the hood. Go to the passenger side. Grab the heat riser flap on the exhaust manifold and make sure it turns properly.

If that thing is closed the engine will not be able to breathe.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1921984
09/29/15 07:33 PM
09/29/15 07:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,840
The Swamp
S
Sixpak Offline
master
Sixpak  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,840
The Swamp
Had a friend back in the day with a 318 OD 4 speed Aspen wagon. On a long trip we pulled down 27-28 mpg with a stock motor. Don't be too quick to ditch the Carter 2 barrel. Make sure the floats and the metering rods are adjusted properly. Make sure the heat crossover in the intake manifold is not plugged - I've cleaned a few 318 intakes out that were choked solid with carbon from the EGR. And check out the heat riser and cat converter as others have mentioned.

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: cudaman1969] #1922008
09/29/15 08:37 PM
09/29/15 08:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
Originally Posted By cudaman1969
What octane is your fuel there?


I doubt that's much of an issue. The cheapest fuel available would be 95 Research Octane (RON) that's ca. 91 octane US. 93 and 95 octane US (98 & 100 RON) are also available at most filling stations but on a low compression engine that would be a waste of money.

I'll check the heat riser flap tomorrow. How does the intake crossover affect mileage btw? Using a valley pan that actually blocks the crossover passage seems to be a popular solution to fuel evaporation in the carb. Do they also get terrible fuel economy?

Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1922021
09/29/15 08:54 PM
09/29/15 08:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By rory73
Originally Posted By cudaman1969
What octane is your fuel there?


I doubt that's much of an issue. The cheapest fuel available would be 95 Research Octane (RON) that's ca. 91 octane US. 93 and 95 octane US (98 & 100 RON) are also available at most filling stations but on a low compression engine that would be a waste of money.

I'll check the heat riser flap tomorrow. How does the intake crossover affect mileage btw? Using a valley pan that actually blocks the crossover passage seems to be a popular solution to fuel evaporation in the carb. Do they also get terrible fuel economy?

If clogged, it keeps the choke,if stove type, not electric, from opening. How far down do you have to push the gas pedal to maintain, say 35 mph.

Last edited by cudaman1969; 09/29/15 08:57 PM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1922028
09/29/15 09:04 PM
09/29/15 09:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
R
rory73 Offline OP
member
rory73  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 79
Europe
I have the traditional divorced choke setup:


Not sure if the "electric assist" function works (the cable going to a little metal plate). Ordered a replacement but hasn't arrived yet. I did however disable the choke on the old carb without seing any major changes in fuel economy.

Never really thought about how the accelerator pedal feels, it's responsive enough though. Certainly no excessive travel.

Last edited by rory73; 09/29/15 09:07 PM.
Re: Very poor fuel economy [Re: rory73] #1922102
09/29/15 10:56 PM
09/29/15 10:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,290
fredericksburg,va
Originally Posted By rory73
I have the traditional divorced choke setup:


Not sure if the "electric assist" function works (the cable going to a little metal plate). Ordered a replacement but hasn't arrived yet. I did however disable the choke on the old carb without seing any major changes in fuel economy.

Never really thought about how the accelerator pedal feels, it's responsive enough though. Certainly no excessive travel.

If you're not having to floor it to get moving, maybe carb is flooding. Look in carb when running, see if fuel is drizzling from the boosters. If not see how far throttle opens before fuel drizzles and how much. You're dumping a lot of fuel to only get 5 mpg. What is the longest time you drove the car?

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1