need more crank endplay
#1830299
05/19/15 08:36 PM
05/19/15 08:36 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
I just put the crank in my 416 and checked endplay - I have .002". I know factory spec is .002" -.007" but clearly I need some more. I have the dial indicator set up perpendicular to the crank snout on a magnetic base and I pried on the crank throws with a long screwdriver. I pried at a few different points front to back.
Next, I smacked the crank back and forth with a dead blow several times to try and seat it but it's still the same .002".
So looks like the crank needs to come out. Then what? What is the best procedure here? I read in the small block stroker engines book that you take the crank out and run the thrust bearing ends across some emery paper to get some more clearance. OK to do it this way?
It actually looks like this may have already been done by the machine shop before I got it back; they align bored it. He didn't say what the thrust clearance was and I forgot to ask but it must have been close to what I am getting.
So can I go with the procedure that's in the book? Not drilling the caps or anything like that.
Thanks,
Greg
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830337
05/19/15 09:31 PM
05/19/15 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561 USA
B3RE
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
|
Check the endplay with out #3 cap in place. There is a good possibility that when they did the align bore, they didn't get the cap cut square. If it gets better with the cap off, that's the problem.
Mike Beachel
I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: B3RE]
#1830345
05/19/15 09:43 PM
05/19/15 09:43 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
Hmmm - everything was pretty much dead nuts when I was checking clearances with a dial gauge. Seems odd that it would be the cap itself, he didn't have to cut a whole lot, maybe a few thousandths.
Guess I can check it though, I likely have to take the crank out anyway.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830365
05/19/15 10:11 PM
05/19/15 10:11 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561 USA
B3RE
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
|
Hmmm - everything was pretty much dead nuts when I was checking clearances with a dial gauge. Seems odd that it would be the cap itself, he didn't have to cut a whole lot, maybe a few thousandths.
Guess I can check it though, I likely have to take the crank out anyway. The clearances will be ok, because it was honed to size. If the cap was cut out of square when prepping for the honing process, then the flange area of the cap may not be perpendicular to the bearing bore. It doesn't take much to close up a few thousandths of endplay.
Mike Beachel
I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: B3RE]
#1830383
05/19/15 10:45 PM
05/19/15 10:45 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
Hmmm - everything was pretty much dead nuts when I was checking clearances with a dial gauge. Seems odd that it would be the cap itself, he didn't have to cut a whole lot, maybe a few thousandths.
Guess I can check it though, I likely have to take the crank out anyway. The clearances will be ok, because it was honed to size. If the cap was cut out of square when prepping for the honing process, then the flange area of the cap may not be perpendicular to the bearing bore. It doesn't take much to close up a few thousandths of endplay. I guess that makes sense, didn't really think about it like that. But, I still think an out of square cap is the less likely cause for now.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830392
05/19/15 10:54 PM
05/19/15 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561 USA
B3RE
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 561
USA
|
It might not be, but I thought I'd mention it since I had it happen to me once. Checking without the cap will tell for sure.
Mike Beachel
I didn't write the rules of math nor create the laws of physics, I am just bound by them.
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830451
05/19/15 11:55 PM
05/19/15 11:55 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,097 back in Georgia
dthemi
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,097
back in Georgia
|
It can still change from crush, and the housing bore size affects that. If it's all square and you've knocked the crank home from the rear as a normal assembly with the cap snug and you still don't have enough, you can do this.
Get something that's ground flat, granite, ect. Take some wet 400, or 600. Put the paper on the ground surface. Take both sides of the thrust bearing and place them together as they go in the motor with the front side of the bearing halves against the paper. Evenly, lightly, circularly sand a couple thou off the front of the thrust. The rear (where the load is will be unaffected), and you'll get what you need. I can find no reason to have .004 in a race motor. .006 would be bare min for me, and I'd rather have .008.
The lesser quality the crank, the more i'd want given how much flex goes on, as the power goes up. JMO
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830544
05/20/15 01:23 AM
05/20/15 01:23 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
Thanks for the replies, will check it out again tomorrow.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: Dartcuda]
#1830567
05/20/15 01:53 AM
05/20/15 01:53 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
I've put several smallblocks together at .003" , I would run it. Maybe..........but he only has .002 NOT .003. That's the same as saying you want .0025 on the rods and it has .0015, run it. Would you do THAT?........ And I'm like DT, for a RACE motor, both of those are TIGHT. Now while this might not be an all out race build, it ain't stock either, being a 416. Depending on what crank it has, I would be looking for .005 minimum and would probably go .006 Monte
Last edited by Monte_Smith; 05/20/15 01:57 AM.
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1830751
05/20/15 01:19 PM
05/20/15 01:19 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
OK, looks like I have enough clearance now, it's at .008".
I went through the checks mentioned previously; I took the #3 cap off, re-tested and still had .002". The all the caps came off, tested again and still the same so clearly it was the bearing.
So I went and did the sanding procedure - I rubbed the thrust bearing surface on some wet, 320 grit sandpaper. The flattest surface I could find was my drill press base so I set it down on there and went to town.
Once I started, I checked the outer width of the bearing with a dial caliper to gauge how much material I took off but I couldn't get consistent readings. (prolly my cheap-o digital dial caliper)
Anyway, after several rounds of sanding/cleaning/sanding I put the crank back in without the caps to see where it was at and I got .008". Obviously I have to check it again when everything is torqued down but clearly it's within the correct range now. Even if I lose 1-.002" I should still be within acceptable margins.
Bob, the studs are just finger tight before I put the caps on. They have an allen key slot at the top to ease with installation. Once they are down I just give them a little snug to make sure they are all evenly seated. That's it, no real force.
Thanks for all the help. Will report back later when the caps are torqued down.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: need more crank endplay
[Re: RMCHRGR]
#1831517
05/21/15 03:50 PM
05/21/15 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
Well, I put everything together again and am only at .004-.005". Better but I'm guessing not optimal, even though it's in the middle of the factory spec range.
As stated before, the .008" clearance was measured without the caps. I re-installed the caps except for #3 and measured - definitely .004" to .005". The .005" was if I really lean on it with the screwdriver.
Put the #3 cap on, no change from without it so looks like the #3 cap is probably OK. Maybe it's another one?
So is it OK to leave it or am I really rolling the dice here? My gut tells me to leave it. What kind of things happen with insufficient endplay? Frankly, I'd rather not keep messing around with this any more.
If it matters, this combo is probably not going to see a ton of RPM, maybe 6,500 give or take. This is mostly a street machine that I hope to get down the track regularly though if I can ever finish the engine.
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
|
|