Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1804691
04/16/15 02:02 AM
04/16/15 02:02 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701 Northern California
lilcuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701
Northern California
|
I'll post a picture of the setup on the Valiant tomorrow. I'm on my tablet right now and the pix are on my computer. You definitely want PCV on the street, but make it easy to take off for track days. The Valiant has no PCV and when I took off the valve covers recently, they were full of condensation. I'm looking into putting PCV on it.
'67 is an abbreviation of 1967 67' is an abbreviation of 67 feet They are not interchangeable.
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1804705
04/16/15 02:12 AM
04/16/15 02:12 AM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701 Northern California
lilcuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701
Northern California
|
Found this pic in my email.
'67 is an abbreviation of 1967 67' is an abbreviation of 67 feet They are not interchangeable.
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1804719
04/16/15 02:21 AM
04/16/15 02:21 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
As far as baffling in the VC's, they need to be AS good as factory at a bare minimum. Then I would run an air/oil separator in the PCV line.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: AndyF]
#1805095
04/16/15 06:05 PM
04/16/15 06:05 PM
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701 Northern California
lilcuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 701
Northern California
|
Have you had the Valiant to the track yet? That remote breather setup is the last iteration on a long running breather project. Tim tried a number of different breather setups and they all had issues of some sort.
I think the remote setup in the picture should solve the problems but it was fairly expensive. Also, there is no PCV on the motor. Shouldn't be a problem for a track car but a street car can get a little sludgy if it is driven around town without PCV. I have not gotten it to the track yet. Other pressing non-car issues came up that have been requiring my attention. I do plan to get it out on the track, though. I plan to leave the existing setup in place. For now, I removed the oil caps from the valve covers and replaced them with MP breathers. I'll see if that cures the sludge/condensation issues during street driving. If that takes care of it, then the plan is to use the two extra breathers on the street and put the oil caps back on for track duty. I also have to remember to drain the catch can every time I drive it.
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Wildjones]
#1805330
04/16/15 11:37 PM
04/16/15 11:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664 IN
ahy
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
|
Perfect timing for this thread. I'm in the same boat and have been looking for threads that offer guidance on this topic.
Do any valve covers come with baffling out of the box? What does the baffling need to look like/how do you need to setup the baffles to control the oil? The MP cast aluminum valve covers have a simple baffle... but too far away from the VC top to be fully effective. Fix, recommended by Rick E, is to adjust the baffle with a ball peen hammer to make it tighter to the top. I did this mod with PCV and it works/stays clean with street use. Limited track time however (I'll report back after this weekend HSAX training runs!).
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1805606
04/17/15 02:13 PM
04/17/15 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 667 Los Osos, Ca
CKessel
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 667
Los Osos, Ca
|
I will need to address this too. One of the things I have been contemplating is using the seperators like what are made and used on the genIII Hemi cars. Moroso and others make them. Seems that the oe systems don't seperate out the oil vapors enough on them and thats what I've been investigating. I like the full length baffles in the vc's too.
Carl Kessel
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: ahy]
#1807398
04/20/15 01:04 AM
04/20/15 01:04 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30 Norcal
Wildjones
member
|
member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
|
An easy first step is put the PCV pickup on the right side VC... the crank throws oil to the left. Depending on how hard you push it, more may be needed but right side PCV is a start. Is the right side driver or passenger side? What about an oil catch can? I was thinking about running a breather on the passenger (or driver, depending on above question) vc, and a pvc on the opposite vc. The breather would vent to atmosphere, while the pvc valve would go to the catch can. The other opening of the catch can would go to the carb (or is it intake?). Valve covers would have full length baffling. This would go on my 440 stroker (70 Cuda) that I am hoping to autocross, and occasionally road race, but mostly drive on the street. Is this overkill? Would it even work?
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1807440
04/20/15 01:57 AM
04/20/15 01:57 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240 Plano, Texas
68cuda440
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
|
Technically, the RIGHT side is described as being behind the car looking forward. I have seen many examples of people that are UN informed about this, which is why referring to driver/passenger side must be comfortable to them. I know the difference but I always refer to driver/passenger because it leaves no misunderstanding. Someone could either be confused about L/R or could assume I am. If I state driver/passenger side then there is no possible misunderstanding either way. -Michael
Michael
1968 Barracuda Notchback Coupe
440 EFI 6-pack, T56 Magnum 6-spd
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Wildjones]
#1808167
04/20/15 10:54 PM
04/20/15 10:54 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493 Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog
OP
Striving for excellence
|
OP
Striving for excellence
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
|
I've heard some refer to the right as the driver side because that's on the right When standing at the front of the car looking back, as you would if you were working on your car. Thus why I asked passenger or driver side.
Sorry if the following appears rude or blunt, but the people you speak of are wrong. Perspective is from drivers seat or from rear of car looking forward. Factory service manuals are written this way as well.
|
|
|
Re: Oil and PCV control for a street and track car
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1808331
04/21/15 02:37 AM
04/21/15 02:37 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30 Norcal
Wildjones
member
|
member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 30
Norcal
|
I've heard some refer to the right as the driver side because that's on the right When standing at the front of the car looking back, as you would if you were working on your car. Thus why I asked passenger or driver side.
Sorry if the following appears rude or blunt, but the people you speak of are wrong. Perspective is from drivers seat or from rear of car looking forward. Factory service manuals are written this way as well. No worries about being blunt or rude. I agree - Never said otherwise. I just wanted clarification on whoever referred to the right said to make sure I was on the same page. I reread the beginning of the thread and something finally clicked. I dont know why I asked the question about the catch can. Thanks for the pointer Tom Quad.
|
|
|
|
|